DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: An integrated sustainability evaluation of high-octane gasoline production from lignocellulosic biomass

Abstract

Abstract A holistic sustainability analysis for early‐stage biofuel production processes plays a critical role in the improvement of the overall life‐cycle sustainability. Once a conceptual conversion process is developed, the next step is to evaluate its overall sustainability, preferably based on a process sustainability evaluation methodology using various indicators. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s Gauging Reaction Effectiveness for the Environmental Sustainability of Chemistries with a Multi‐objective Process Evaluator (GREENSCOPE) methodology evaluates processes in four areas: environment, energy, economics, and efficiency. The method develops relative sustainability scores for indicators that allow comparisons across various technologies. In this study, we implemented GREENSCOPE methodology for a sustainability performance assessment of NREL's conceptual design for the indirect liquefaction of biomass to high‐octane gasoline blendstock by evaluating a range of metrics beyond the typical minimum fuel selling price and greenhouse gas emissions considerations. We applied this methodology to assess the sustainability performance of this gate‐to‐gate conceptual design. One outcome of the sustainability evaluation is to allow researchers to identify process areas in need of sustainability improvement during biofuel production, and the challenges and opportunities for achieving the best possible sustainability targets. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]
  1. National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States). National Bioenergy Center
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Sustainable Transportation Office. Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO)
OSTI Identifier:
1570185
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1567894
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5100-73269
Journal ID: ISSN 1932-104X
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC36-08GO28308; DE‐AC36‐08GO28308
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 13; Journal Issue: 6; Journal ID: ISSN 1932-104X
Publisher:
Wiley
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; process sustainability; GREENSCOPE; biorefinery; biofuel; high-octane gasoline; life cycle assessment

Citation Formats

Tan, Eric C. D. An integrated sustainability evaluation of high-octane gasoline production from lignocellulosic biomass. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1002/bbb.2045.
Tan, Eric C. D. An integrated sustainability evaluation of high-octane gasoline production from lignocellulosic biomass. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2045
Tan, Eric C. D. Mon . "An integrated sustainability evaluation of high-octane gasoline production from lignocellulosic biomass". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2045. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1570185.
@article{osti_1570185,
title = {An integrated sustainability evaluation of high-octane gasoline production from lignocellulosic biomass},
author = {Tan, Eric C. D.},
abstractNote = {Abstract A holistic sustainability analysis for early‐stage biofuel production processes plays a critical role in the improvement of the overall life‐cycle sustainability. Once a conceptual conversion process is developed, the next step is to evaluate its overall sustainability, preferably based on a process sustainability evaluation methodology using various indicators. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s Gauging Reaction Effectiveness for the Environmental Sustainability of Chemistries with a Multi‐objective Process Evaluator (GREENSCOPE) methodology evaluates processes in four areas: environment, energy, economics, and efficiency. The method develops relative sustainability scores for indicators that allow comparisons across various technologies. In this study, we implemented GREENSCOPE methodology for a sustainability performance assessment of NREL's conceptual design for the indirect liquefaction of biomass to high‐octane gasoline blendstock by evaluating a range of metrics beyond the typical minimum fuel selling price and greenhouse gas emissions considerations. We applied this methodology to assess the sustainability performance of this gate‐to‐gate conceptual design. One outcome of the sustainability evaluation is to allow researchers to identify process areas in need of sustainability improvement during biofuel production, and the challenges and opportunities for achieving the best possible sustainability targets. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd},
doi = {10.1002/bbb.2045},
journal = {Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining},
number = 6,
volume = 13,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Sep 30 00:00:00 EDT 2019},
month = {Mon Sep 30 00:00:00 EDT 2019}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 7 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

An integrated computer-aided system for generation and evaluation of sustainable process alternatives
journal, October 2003

  • Jensen, Niels; Coll, Nuria; Gani, Rafiqul
  • Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, Vol. 5, Issue 3-4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10098-003-0224-9

Technoeconomic Analysis for the Production of Mixed Alcohols via Indirect Gasification of Biomass Based on Demonstration Experiments
journal, July 2014

  • Dutta, Abhijit; Hensley, Jesse; Bain, Richard
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 53, Issue 30
  • DOI: 10.1021/ie402045q

A combined heuristic and indicator-based methodology for design of sustainable chemical process plants
journal, August 2011


SUSTAINABILITY EVALUATOR: Tool for evaluating process sustainability
journal, July 2012

  • Shadiya, Olamide O.; High, Karen A.
  • Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, Vol. 32, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/ep.11667

Sustainability Indicators for Chemical Processes: III. Biodiesel Case Study
journal, May 2013

  • Ruiz-Mercado, Gerardo J.; Gonzalez, Michael A.; Smith, Raymond L.
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 52, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1021/ie302804x

Implementation of sustainability drivers in the design of industrial chemical processes
journal, February 2011

  • Tugnoli, Alessandro; Santarelli, Francesco; Cozzani, Valerio
  • AIChE Journal, Vol. 57, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1002/aic.12497

Pollution prevention with chemical process simulators: the generalized waste reduction (WAR) algorithm—full version
journal, May 1999


A Modular Approach to Sustainability Assessment and Decision Support in Chemical Process Design
journal, September 2010

  • Othman, Mohamad R.; Repke, Jens-Uwe; Wozny, Günter
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 49, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1021/ie901943d

Applying Environmental Release Inventories and Indicators to the Evaluation of Chemical Manufacturing Processes in Early Stage Development
journal, May 2019

  • Smith, Raymond L.; Tan, Eric C. D.; Ruiz-Mercado, Gerardo J.
  • ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, Vol. 7, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01961

Comparative techno‐economic analysis and process design for indirect liquefaction pathways to distillate‐range fuels via biomass‐derived oxygenated intermediates upgrading
journal, September 2016

  • Tan, Eric C. D.; Snowden‐Swan, Lesley J.; Talmadge, Michael
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 11, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1710

Conceptual process design and economics for the production of high-octane gasoline blendstock via indirect liquefaction of biomass through methanol/dimethyl ether intermediates
journal, October 2015

  • Tan, Eric CD; Talmadge, Michael; Dutta, Abhijit
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1611

Computer aided design for sustainable industrial processes: Specific tools and applications
journal, April 2009

  • Fermeglia, Maurizio; Longo, Gennaro; Toma, Letitia
  • AIChE Journal, Vol. 55, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/aic.11730

Design of sustainable chemical processes: Systematic retrofit analysis generation and evaluation of alternatives
journal, September 2008

  • Carvalho, Ana; Gani, Rafiqul; Matos, Henrique
  • Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol. 86, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2007.11.003

Evaluation Tool for the Environmental Design of Chemical Processes
journal, December 2011

  • Torres, Carmen M.; Gadalla, Mamdouh A.; Mateo-Sanz, Josep M.
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 50, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1021/ie201024b

Sustainability Indicators for Chemical Processes: I. Taxonomy
journal, January 2012

  • Ruiz-Mercado, Gerardo J.; Smith, Raymond L.; Gonzalez, Michael A.
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 51, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/ie102116e

Gas Conversion to Liquid Fuels and Chemicals: The Methanol Route‐Catalysis and Processes Development
journal, January 2009


Decision framework for chemical process design including different stages of environmental, health, and safety assessment
journal, January 2008

  • Sugiyama, Hirokazu; Fischer, Ulrich; Hungerbühler, Konrad
  • AIChE Journal, Vol. 54, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/aic.11430

Directly converting CO2 into a gasoline fuel
journal, May 2017

  • Wei, Jian; Ge, Qingjie; Yao, Ruwei
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15174

The changing paradigm in CO2 utilization
journal, December 2013


Removal of introduced inorganic content from chipped forest residues via air classification
journal, November 2015


Optimization of multi-pathway production chains and multi-criteria decision-making through sustainability evaluation: a biojet fuel production case study
journal, July 2018

  • Vyhmeister, Eduardo; Ruiz-Mercado, Gerardo J.; Torres, Ana I.
  • Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, Vol. 20, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10098-018-1576-5

Chemical Recycling of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol and Dimethyl Ether: From Greenhouse Gas to Renewable, Environmentally Carbon Neutral Fuels and Synthetic Hydrocarbons
journal, January 2009

  • Olah, George A.; Goeppert, Alain; Prakash, G. K. Surya
  • The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Vol. 74, Issue 2, p. 487-498
  • DOI: 10.1021/jo801260f

Expanding GREENSCOPE beyond the gate: a green chemistry and life cycle perspective
journal, October 2012

  • Ruiz-Mercado, Gerardo J.; Gonzalez, Michael A.; Smith, Raymond L.
  • Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, Vol. 16, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10098-012-0533-y

Selective Homologation Routes to 2,2,3-Trimethylbutane on Solid Acids
journal, May 2009

  • Ahn, John H.; Temel, Burcin; Iglesia, Enrique
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Vol. 48, Issue 21, p. 3814-3816
  • DOI: 10.1002/anie.200900541

Sustainable biorefineries, an analysis of practices for incorporating sustainability in biorefinery design
journal, November 2017


Sustainability Indicators for Chemical Processes: II. Data Needs
journal, January 2012

  • Ruiz-Mercado, Gerardo J.; Smith, Raymond L.; Gonzalez, Michael A.
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 51, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/ie200755k

An Approach to Quantitative Sustainability Assessment in the Early Stages of Process Design
journal, June 2008

  • Tugnoli, Alessandro; Santarelli, Francesco; Cozzani, Valerio
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 42, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1021/es702441r

Selective Homologation Routes to 2,2,3-Trimethylbutane on Solid Acids
journal, May 2009

  • Ahn, John H.; Temel, Burcin; Iglesia, Enrique
  • Angewandte Chemie, Vol. 121, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1002/ange.200900541