Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models
- Authors:
- Publication Date:
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1549537
- Resource Type:
- Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Cognition
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Name: Cognition Journal Volume: 170 Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0010-0277
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Country of Publication:
- Netherlands
- Language:
- English
Citation Formats
Costello, Fintan, Watts, Paul, and Fisher, Christopher. Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models. Netherlands: N. p., 2018.
Web. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.012.
Costello, Fintan, Watts, Paul, & Fisher, Christopher. Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models. Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.012
Costello, Fintan, Watts, Paul, and Fisher, Christopher. Mon .
"Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models". Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.012.
@article{osti_1549537,
title = {Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models},
author = {Costello, Fintan and Watts, Paul and Fisher, Christopher},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.012},
journal = {Cognition},
number = C,
volume = 170,
place = {Netherlands},
year = {Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2018},
month = {Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2018}
}
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.012
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.012
Other availability
Search WorldCat to find libraries that may hold this journal
Save to My Library
You must Sign In or Create an Account in order to save documents to your library.
Works referenced in this record:
Heuristics can produce surprisingly rational probability estimates: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014).
journal, January 2016
- Nilsson, Håkan; Juslin, Peter; Winman, Anders
- Psychological Review, Vol. 123, Issue 1
Rationality
journal, February 2002
- Shafir, Eldar; LeBoeuf, Robyn A.
- Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 53, Issue 1
The conjunction fallacy, confirmation, and quantum theory: Comment on Tentori, Crupi, and Russo (2013).
journal, January 2015
- Busemeyer, Jerome R.; Wang, Zheng; Pothos, Emmanuel M.
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 144, Issue 1
The Conjunction fallacy: Causality vs. event probability
journal, January 1990
- Thüring, Manfred; Jungermann, Helmut
- Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 3, Issue 1
On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: Probability versus inductive confirmation.
journal, February 2013
- Tentori, Katya; Crupi, Vincenzo; Russo, Selena
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 142, Issue 1
A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.
journal, January 2011
- Busemeyer, Jerome R.; Pothos, Emmanuel M.; Franco, Riccardo
- Psychological Review, Vol. 118, Issue 2
Nudge—A new and better way to improve health?
journal, February 2012
- Vallgårda, Signild
- Health Policy, Vol. 104, Issue 2
Why versus how often: Causal reasoning and the incidence of judgmental bias
journal, September 1984
- Locksley, Anne; Stangor, Charles
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 20, Issue 5
Conditional Probabilities, Potential Surprise, and the Conjunction Fallacy
journal, August 1998
- Pidgeon, John E. Fisk Nick
- The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, Vol. 51, Issue 3
A Quantum Probability Account of Order Effects in Inference
journal, September 2011
- Trueblood, Jennifer S.; Busemeyer, Jerome R.
- Cognitive Science, Vol. 35, Issue 8
On the reality of the conjunction fallacy
journal, March 2002
- Sides, Ashley; Osherson, Daniel; Bonini, Nicolao
- Memory & Cognition, Vol. 30, Issue 2
Causality Does Influence Conjunctive Probability Judgments If Context and Design Allow for It
journal, July 1995
- Fabre, Jean-Marc; Caverni, Jean Paul; Jungermann, Helmut
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 63, Issue 1
Explaining High Conjunction Fallacy Rates: The Probability Theory Plus Noise Account
journal, February 2016
- Costello, Fintan; Watts, Paul
- Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 30, Issue 2
Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics
journal, November 2003
- Kahneman, Daniel
- American Economic Review, Vol. 93, Issue 5
How probability theory explains the conjunction fallacy
journal, August 2008
- Costello, Fintan J.
- Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 22, Issue 3
Probability theory plus noise: Replies to Crupi and Tentori (2016) and to Nilsson, Juslin, and Winman (2016).
journal, January 2016
- Costello, Fintan; Watts, Paul
- Psychological Review, Vol. 123, Issue 1
Surprisingly rational: Probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
journal, January 2014
- Costello, Fintan; Watts, Paul
- Psychological Review, Vol. 121, Issue 3
From Nudging to Budging: Using Behavioural Economics to Inform Public Sector Policy
journal, July 2013
- Oliver, Adam
- Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 42, Issue 4
The Conjunction Effect: New Evidence for Robustness
journal, January 2003
- Stolarz-Fantino, Stephanie; Fantino, Edmund; Zizzo, Daniel J.
- The American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 116, Issue 1
A law of comparative judgment.
journal, January 1927
- Thurstone, L. L.
- Psychological Review, Vol. 34, Issue 4
People’s conditional probability judgments follow probability theory (plus noise)
journal, September 2016
- Costello, Fintan; Watts, Paul
- Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 89
Heuristics and biases - a biased perspective on clinical reasoning
journal, September 2005
- Eva, Kevin W.; Norman, Geoffrey R.
- Medical Education, Vol. 39, Issue 9
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
journal, October 1983
- Tversky, Amos; Kahneman, Daniel
- Psychological Review, Vol. 90, Issue 4
Noisy probability judgment, the conjunction fallacy, and rationality: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014).
journal, January 2016
- Crupi, Vincenzo; Tentori, Katya
- Psychological Review, Vol. 123, Issue 1
Heuristic Decision Making
journal, January 2011
- Gigerenzer, Gerd; Gaissmaier, Wolfgang
- Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 62, Issue 1
Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model
journal, January 1992
- Hogarth, Robin M.; Einhorn, Hillel J.
- Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 24, Issue 1
Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics
journal, July 2000
- Korobkin, Russell B.; Ulen, Thomas S.
- California Law Review, Vol. 88, Issue 4
On the psychology of prediction.
journal, July 1973
- Kahneman, Daniel; Tversky, Amos
- Psychological Review, Vol. 80, Issue 4
Component probabilities and the conjunction fallacy: Resolving signed summation and the low component model in a contingent approach
journal, October 1996
- Fisk, John E.; Pidgeon, Nick
- Acta Psychologica, Vol. 94, Issue 1
Testing boundary conditions for the conjunction fallacy: Effects of response mode, conceptual focus, and problem type
journal, April 2008
- Wedell, Douglas H.; Moro, Rodrigo
- Cognition, Vol. 107, Issue 1
Toward a synthesis of cognitive biases: How noisy information processing can bias human decision making.
journal, March 2012
- Hilbert, Martin
- Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 138, Issue 2
Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory.
journal, January 2012
- Schacter, Daniel L.
- American Psychologist, Vol. 67, Issue 8
MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood.
journal, January 1999
- Dougherty, Michael R. P.; Gettys, Charles F.; Ogden, Eve E.
- Psychological Review, Vol. 106, Issue 1
Representativeness and conjoint probability.
journal, January 1991
- Gavanski, Igor; Roskos-Ewoldsen, David R.
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 61, Issue 2
Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: The role of error in judgment processes.
journal, July 1994
- Erev, Ido; Wallsten, Thomas S.; Budescu, David V.
- Psychological Review, Vol. 101, Issue 3
Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research
journal, October 2012
- Aust, Frederik; Diedenhofen, Birk; Ullrich, Sebastian
- Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 45, Issue 2
The conjunction fallacy: A test of averaging hypotheses
journal, March 1997
- Fantino, Edmund; Kulik, James; Stolarz-fantino, Stephanie
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Vol. 4, Issue 1
Individual differences in base rate neglect: A fuzzy processing preference index
journal, June 2013
- Wolfe, Christopher R.; Fisher, Christopher R.
- Learning and Individual Differences, Vol. 25