DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Estimation of and barriers to waste heat recovery from harsh environments in industrial processes

Abstract

This paper discusses the industrial potential for waste heat recovery (WHR) in harsh environments – defined as a waste heat stream having either a temperature of at least 650 °C or containing reactive constituents that complicate heat recovery. The analysis covers five industries (steel, aluminum, glass, cement, and lime), chosen based on volume of production, discharge of exhaust gases containing components that present harsh environments, possibility of recovering considerably more heat than currently recovered, and current lack of acceptable WHR options. The total potential energy savings identified in harsh environment waste heat streams from these industries is equal to 15.4% (113.6 TWh) of the process heat energy lost in U.S. manufacturing. Existing technologies and materials for these industries are evaluated and the recoverable waste heat from harsh environment gas for each industrial sector is estimated. Finally, an in-depth summary of each waste heat source shows exactly where waste heat can be recovered and what specific issues must be addressed. The most potential lies within steel blast furnaces (46 TWh/year). Other waste heat streams considered include steel electric arc furnaces (14.1 TWh/year), flat glass (3.6 TWh/year), container glass (5.7 TWh/year), glass fiber (1.1 TWh/year), specialty glass (2.2 TWh/year), aluminum melting furnacesmore » (4.7 TWh/year), cement (17.1 TWh/year), and lime (10.5 TWh/year). Furthermore attempts to recover waste heat in harsh environments have been mostly unsuccessful, advances in research and technology could unlock an enormous potential for energy and cost savings.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [3];  [4]
  1. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  2. E3M, Inc., Sugar Land, TX (United States)
  3. U.S. Dept. of Energy, Washington, D.C. (United States)
  4. Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
OSTI Identifier:
1507869
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Cleaner Production
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 222; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0959-6526
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
42 ENGINEERING; Waste heat recovery; Waste heat losses; Industrial process heating; Strategic analysis; Materials for harsh environment; High-temperature

Citation Formats

Vance, David, Nimbalkar, Sachin U., Thekdi, Arvind, Armstrong, Kristina O., Wenning, Thomas, Cresko, Joseph, and Jin, Mingzhou. Estimation of and barriers to waste heat recovery from harsh environments in industrial processes. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.011.
Vance, David, Nimbalkar, Sachin U., Thekdi, Arvind, Armstrong, Kristina O., Wenning, Thomas, Cresko, Joseph, & Jin, Mingzhou. Estimation of and barriers to waste heat recovery from harsh environments in industrial processes. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.011
Vance, David, Nimbalkar, Sachin U., Thekdi, Arvind, Armstrong, Kristina O., Wenning, Thomas, Cresko, Joseph, and Jin, Mingzhou. Wed . "Estimation of and barriers to waste heat recovery from harsh environments in industrial processes". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.011. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1507869.
@article{osti_1507869,
title = {Estimation of and barriers to waste heat recovery from harsh environments in industrial processes},
author = {Vance, David and Nimbalkar, Sachin U. and Thekdi, Arvind and Armstrong, Kristina O. and Wenning, Thomas and Cresko, Joseph and Jin, Mingzhou},
abstractNote = {This paper discusses the industrial potential for waste heat recovery (WHR) in harsh environments – defined as a waste heat stream having either a temperature of at least 650 °C or containing reactive constituents that complicate heat recovery. The analysis covers five industries (steel, aluminum, glass, cement, and lime), chosen based on volume of production, discharge of exhaust gases containing components that present harsh environments, possibility of recovering considerably more heat than currently recovered, and current lack of acceptable WHR options. The total potential energy savings identified in harsh environment waste heat streams from these industries is equal to 15.4% (113.6 TWh) of the process heat energy lost in U.S. manufacturing. Existing technologies and materials for these industries are evaluated and the recoverable waste heat from harsh environment gas for each industrial sector is estimated. Finally, an in-depth summary of each waste heat source shows exactly where waste heat can be recovered and what specific issues must be addressed. The most potential lies within steel blast furnaces (46 TWh/year). Other waste heat streams considered include steel electric arc furnaces (14.1 TWh/year), flat glass (3.6 TWh/year), container glass (5.7 TWh/year), glass fiber (1.1 TWh/year), specialty glass (2.2 TWh/year), aluminum melting furnaces (4.7 TWh/year), cement (17.1 TWh/year), and lime (10.5 TWh/year). Furthermore attempts to recover waste heat in harsh environments have been mostly unsuccessful, advances in research and technology could unlock an enormous potential for energy and cost savings.},
doi = {10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.011},
journal = {Journal of Cleaner Production},
number = C,
volume = 222,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Mar 06 00:00:00 EST 2019},
month = {Wed Mar 06 00:00:00 EST 2019}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 29 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Failure analysis of stainless steel tubes in a recuperator due to elevated temperature sulphur corrosion
journal, September 2008


Energy and exergy assessments of a lime shaft kiln
journal, March 2013


Emerging energy-efficiency and CO2 emission-reduction technologies for cement and concrete production: A technical review
journal, October 2012

  • Hasanbeigi, Ali; Price, Lynn; Lin, Elina
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 16, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.07.019

Exergy balance of glass-melting furnaces
journal, December 1985

  • Kozlov, A. S.; Shutnikova, L. P.; Kotselko, R. S.
  • Glass and Ceramics, Vol. 42, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00697688

An overview of energy savings measures for cement industries
journal, March 2013


Advanced alloys for compact, high-efficiency, high-temperature heat-exchangers
journal, November 2007


Performance analysis for glass furnace regenerator
journal, December 2011


Model based energy benchmarking for glass furnace
journal, October 2007


A review of metallic radiation recuperators for thermal exhaust heat recovery
journal, March 2014

  • Sharma, Harshdeep; Kumar, Anoop
  • Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol. 28, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12206-013-1186-4

Influence of waste plastic utilisation in blast furnace on heavy metal emissions
journal, May 2015


Emerging Energy-efficient Technologies for Industry
journal, March 2002


Works referencing / citing this record:

On the Conceptual Design of Novel Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery
journal, January 2020