DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Modulating factors of hydrologic exchanges in a large‐scale river reach: Insights from three‐dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulations

Abstract

Abstract Hydrologic exchange is a critical mechanism that shapes hydrological and biogeochemical processes along a river corridor. Because of limitations in field accessibility, computational demand, and complexities of geomorphology and subsurface geology, full three‐dimensional modelling studies to quantify hydrologic exchange fluxes (HEFs) have been limited mostly to local‐scale applications. At reach scales, although surface flow conditions and subsurface physical properties are well‐known factors that modulate hydrologic exchanges, quantitative measures that can describe the effects of these factors on the strength and direction of such exchanges do not exist. To address this issue, we developed a one‐way coupled surface and subsurface water flow model using the commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software STAR‐CCM+ and applied it to simulate HEFs in a 7‐km long reach along the main stem of the Columbia River in the United States. The model was validated against flow velocity measurements from an acoustic Doppler current profiler in the river, vertical HEFs estimated from a set of temperature profilers installed across the riverbed, and simulations from a reactive transport model. The validated model then was employed to systematically investigate how HEFs could be influenced by surface water fluid dynamics, subsurface structures, and hydrogeological properties. Our results suggest thatmore » reach‐scale HEFs are dominated primarily by the thickness of the riverbed alluvium layer, and then by the alluvium permeability, the depth of the underlying impermeable layer, and the pressure boundary condition. Our results also elucidate the scale dependence of HEFs on fluid dynamics that can be captured only by three‐dimensional CFD models. That is, while the net HEFs over the entire 7‐km domain are not significantly influenced by surface water dynamics pressure, the dynamic pressure induced by fluid dynamics can lead to more than 15% in net HEFs for a river section of a few hundred metres.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland Washington United States of America
  2. Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque New Mexico United States of America
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1476831
Resource Type:
Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Hydrological Processes
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Hydrological Processes Journal Volume: 32 Journal Issue: 23; Journal ID: ISSN 0885-6087
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Bao, Jie, Zhou, Tian, Huang, Maoyi, Hou, Zhangshuan, Perkins, William, Harding, Samuel, Titzler, Scott, Hammond, Glenn, Ren, Huiying, Thorne, Paul, Suffield, Sarah, Murray, Christopher, and Zachara, John. Modulating factors of hydrologic exchanges in a large‐scale river reach: Insights from three‐dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulations. United Kingdom: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1002/hyp.13266.
Bao, Jie, Zhou, Tian, Huang, Maoyi, Hou, Zhangshuan, Perkins, William, Harding, Samuel, Titzler, Scott, Hammond, Glenn, Ren, Huiying, Thorne, Paul, Suffield, Sarah, Murray, Christopher, & Zachara, John. Modulating factors of hydrologic exchanges in a large‐scale river reach: Insights from three‐dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulations. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13266
Bao, Jie, Zhou, Tian, Huang, Maoyi, Hou, Zhangshuan, Perkins, William, Harding, Samuel, Titzler, Scott, Hammond, Glenn, Ren, Huiying, Thorne, Paul, Suffield, Sarah, Murray, Christopher, and Zachara, John. Tue . "Modulating factors of hydrologic exchanges in a large‐scale river reach: Insights from three‐dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulations". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13266.
@article{osti_1476831,
title = {Modulating factors of hydrologic exchanges in a large‐scale river reach: Insights from three‐dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulations},
author = {Bao, Jie and Zhou, Tian and Huang, Maoyi and Hou, Zhangshuan and Perkins, William and Harding, Samuel and Titzler, Scott and Hammond, Glenn and Ren, Huiying and Thorne, Paul and Suffield, Sarah and Murray, Christopher and Zachara, John},
abstractNote = {Abstract Hydrologic exchange is a critical mechanism that shapes hydrological and biogeochemical processes along a river corridor. Because of limitations in field accessibility, computational demand, and complexities of geomorphology and subsurface geology, full three‐dimensional modelling studies to quantify hydrologic exchange fluxes (HEFs) have been limited mostly to local‐scale applications. At reach scales, although surface flow conditions and subsurface physical properties are well‐known factors that modulate hydrologic exchanges, quantitative measures that can describe the effects of these factors on the strength and direction of such exchanges do not exist. To address this issue, we developed a one‐way coupled surface and subsurface water flow model using the commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software STAR‐CCM+ and applied it to simulate HEFs in a 7‐km long reach along the main stem of the Columbia River in the United States. The model was validated against flow velocity measurements from an acoustic Doppler current profiler in the river, vertical HEFs estimated from a set of temperature profilers installed across the riverbed, and simulations from a reactive transport model. The validated model then was employed to systematically investigate how HEFs could be influenced by surface water fluid dynamics, subsurface structures, and hydrogeological properties. Our results suggest that reach‐scale HEFs are dominated primarily by the thickness of the riverbed alluvium layer, and then by the alluvium permeability, the depth of the underlying impermeable layer, and the pressure boundary condition. Our results also elucidate the scale dependence of HEFs on fluid dynamics that can be captured only by three‐dimensional CFD models. That is, while the net HEFs over the entire 7‐km domain are not significantly influenced by surface water dynamics pressure, the dynamic pressure induced by fluid dynamics can lead to more than 15% in net HEFs for a river section of a few hundred metres.},
doi = {10.1002/hyp.13266},
journal = {Hydrological Processes},
number = 23,
volume = 32,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Tue Oct 09 00:00:00 EDT 2018},
month = {Tue Oct 09 00:00:00 EDT 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13266

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 9 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The velocity and temperature distribution in one-dimensional flow with turbulence augmentation and pressure gradient
journal, March 1969


Labile dissolved organic carbon supply limits hyporheic denitrification
journal, January 2011

  • Zarnetske, Jay P.; Haggerty, Roy; Wondzell, Steven M.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 116, Issue G4
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JG001730

CFD evaluation of turbulence models for flow simulation of the fuel rod bundle with a spacer assembly
journal, July 2012


The Validity of Comparative Experiments
journal, January 1948

  • Anscombe, F. J.
  • Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), Vol. 111, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2307/2984159

Effects of fluctuating river flow on groundwater/surface water mixing in the hyporheic zone of a regulated, large cobble bed river
journal, January 2006

  • Arntzen, Evan V.; Geist, David R.; Dresel, P. Evan
  • River Research and Applications, Vol. 22, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1002/rra.947

Investigation of the Hyporheic Zone at the 300 Area,Hanford Site
report, October 2007

  • Fritz, Brad G.; Kohn, Nancy P.; Gilmore, Tyler J.
  • DOI: 10.2172/919705

A general approach to develop reduced order models for simulation of solid oxide fuel cell stacks
journal, June 2013


On the Dynamical Theory of Incompressible Viscous Fluids and the Determination of the Criterion
journal, January 1895

  • Reynolds, O.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 186, Issue 0
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1895.0004

Dynamics of nitrate production and removal as a function of residence time in the hyporheic zone
journal, January 2011

  • Zarnetske, Jay P.; Haggerty, Roy; Wondzell, Steven M.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 116, Issue G1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010JG001356

A reservoir operation scheme for global river routing models
journal, July 2006


Three-dimensional Bayesian geostatistical aquifer characterization at the Hanford 300 Area using tracer test data: INVERSION OF TRACER DATA USING MAD
journal, June 2012

  • Chen, Xingyuan; Murakami, Haruko; Hahn, Melanie S.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 48, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011WR010675

The Natural Flow Regime
journal, December 1997

  • Poff, N. LeRoy; Allan, J. David; Bain, Mark B.
  • BioScience, Vol. 47, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.2307/1313099

Anthropogenic Disturbance of the Terrestrial Water Cycle
journal, January 2000


On Approaches to Analyze the Sensitivity of Simulated Hydrologic Fluxes to Model Parameters in the Community Land Model
journal, December 2015

  • Bao, Jie; Hou, Zhangshuan; Huang, Maoyi
  • Water, Vol. 7, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.3390/w7126662

Efficient calculation of dewatered and entrapped areas using hydrodynamic modeling and GIS
journal, December 2009


Riverbed Hydrologic Exchange Dynamics in a Large Regulated River Reach
journal, April 2018

  • Zhou, Tian; Bao, Jie; Huang, Maoyi
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 54, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017WR020508

Quantifying Flow-Dependent Changes in Subyearling Fall Chinook Salmon Rearing Habitat Using Two-Dimensional Spatially Explicit Modeling
journal, August 2002


Importance of surface-subsurface exchange in stream ecosystems: The hyporheic zone
journal, January 1995


Parent lithology, surface-groundwater exchange, and nitrate retention in headwater streams
journal, March 1996

  • Valett, H. Maurice; Morrice, John A.; Dahm, Clifford N.
  • Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 41, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.4319/lo.1996.41.2.0333

A New Approach to Quantify Shallow Water Hydrologic Exchanges in a Large Regulated River Reach
journal, September 2017

  • Zhou, Tian; Huang, Maoyi; Bao, Jie
  • Water, Vol. 9, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.3390/w9090703

Effect of Rapidly Changing River Stage on Uranium Flux through the Hyporheic Zone
journal, November 2007


Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems
book, January 1996


The application of computational fluid dynamics to natural river channels: Eddy resolving versus mean flow approaches
journal, December 2012


Table for Estimating the Goodness of Fit of Empirical Distributions
journal, June 1948


Relation of streams, lakes, and wetlands to groundwater flow systems
journal, February 1999


Hyporheic exchange due to channel-spanning logs: HYPORHEIC FLOW AND CHANNEL-SPANNING LOGS
journal, August 2011

  • Sawyer, Audrey H.; Bayani Cardenas, M.; Buttles, Jim
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 47, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011WR010484

About Boussinesq's turbulent viscosity hypothesis: historical remarks and a direct evaluation of its validity
journal, September 2007


River corridor science: Hydrologic exchange and ecological consequences from bedforms to basins: RIVER CORRIDORS FROM BEDFORMS TO BASINS
journal, September 2015

  • Harvey, Jud; Gooseff, Michael
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 51, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015WR017617

River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles
journal, April 1970


Metabolism of streamwater dissolved organic carbon in the shallow hyporheic zone
journal, November 1993

  • Findlay, Stuart; Strayer, David; Goumbala, Cheikh
  • Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 38, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.4319/lo.1993.38.7.1493

Lattice Boltzmann equation model for multi-component multi-phase flow with high density ratios
journal, February 2013


A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows
journal, March 1995


The application of computational fluid dynamics to natural river channels: three-dimensional versus two-dimensional approaches
journal, August 1999


3D simulation of flow around a single spur dike with free-surface flow
journal, March 2010

  • Yazdi, J.; Sarkardeh, H.; Azamathulla, H. Md.
  • International Journal of River Basin Management, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1080/15715121003715107

Patterns in stream longitudinal profiles and implications for hyporheic exchange flow at the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon, USA
journal, January 2005

  • Anderson, Justin K.; Wondzell, Steven M.; Gooseff, Michael N.
  • Hydrological Processes, Vol. 19, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5791