DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Rapid and Simple Capillary-Rise/Vanishing Interfacial Tension Method To Determine Crude Oil Minimum Miscibility Pressure: Pure and Mixed CO 2 , Methane, and Ethane

Abstract

Here, we report a simplification of the capillary-rise/vanishing interfacial tension (IFT) method to measure minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) based on only requiring knowledge of when the interfacial tension approaches zero. Simply measuring the height of the crude oil in a capillary at several pressures from ambient to near the MMP pressure and extrapolating the oil height versus pressure plot to zero oil height yields the MMP without the need of the additional instrumentation and labor required to perform actual IFT measurements. A total of 2-4 MMP values can be determined per day with only one experimental apparatus, and the method greatly reduces the initial cost and complexity of the required instrumentation. The use of three capillaries having different inner diameters allows for triplicate determinations of MMP from each experiment. Because the actual MMP pressure need not be reached during the experiment, MMP values that exceed the pressure ratings of the equipment can be reasonably estimated (e.g., MMPs using pure nitrogen). The method was used to determine the MMP pressure for crude oil samples from a conventional Muddy Formation reservoir in the Powder River Basin [American Petroleum Institute (API) gravity of 35.8°] and an unconventional Bakken Formation reservoir in the Willistonmore » Basin (API gravity of 38.7°). The method is reproducible [typically <4% relative standard deviation (RSD)], and the method gave good agreement for a “live” Bakken oil with the results from a slim tube test of a commercial laboratory. Approximately 80 MMP values were measured using pure CO2, methane, and ethane as well as 0-100% mole ratios of methane/CO2 and methane/ethane. For both oil samples, ethane MMPs were ca. one-half those with CO2, while methane MMPs were ca. double or triple those with CO2. MMPs with mixed methane/CO2 showed a linear increase with mole percent methane for both crude oils, while both oils showed an exponential increase in MMP with mole percent methane in ethane, with a little increase in MMP until ca. 20 mol % methane in ethane.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Energy & Environmental Research Center, University of North Dakota, 15 North 23rd Street, Stop 9018, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58202, United States
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, Morgantown, WV (United States); Univ. of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE; North Dakota Industrial Commission. Dept. of Mineral Resources, Oil and Gas Division; Plains CO2 Reduction Partnership (PCOR)
OSTI Identifier:
1619422
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1438466
Grant/Contract Number:  
FC26-05NT42592; G-030-060
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Energy and Fuels
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Energy and Fuels Journal Volume: 30 Journal Issue: 8; Journal ID: ISSN 0887-0624
Publisher:
American Chemical Society
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
02 PETROLEUM

Citation Formats

Hawthorne, Steven B., Miller, David J., Jin, Lu, and Gorecki, Charles D. Rapid and Simple Capillary-Rise/Vanishing Interfacial Tension Method To Determine Crude Oil Minimum Miscibility Pressure: Pure and Mixed CO 2 , Methane, and Ethane. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01151.
Hawthorne, Steven B., Miller, David J., Jin, Lu, & Gorecki, Charles D. Rapid and Simple Capillary-Rise/Vanishing Interfacial Tension Method To Determine Crude Oil Minimum Miscibility Pressure: Pure and Mixed CO 2 , Methane, and Ethane. United States. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01151
Hawthorne, Steven B., Miller, David J., Jin, Lu, and Gorecki, Charles D. Wed . "Rapid and Simple Capillary-Rise/Vanishing Interfacial Tension Method To Determine Crude Oil Minimum Miscibility Pressure: Pure and Mixed CO 2 , Methane, and Ethane". United States. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01151.
@article{osti_1619422,
title = {Rapid and Simple Capillary-Rise/Vanishing Interfacial Tension Method To Determine Crude Oil Minimum Miscibility Pressure: Pure and Mixed CO 2 , Methane, and Ethane},
author = {Hawthorne, Steven B. and Miller, David J. and Jin, Lu and Gorecki, Charles D.},
abstractNote = {Here, we report a simplification of the capillary-rise/vanishing interfacial tension (IFT) method to measure minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) based on only requiring knowledge of when the interfacial tension approaches zero. Simply measuring the height of the crude oil in a capillary at several pressures from ambient to near the MMP pressure and extrapolating the oil height versus pressure plot to zero oil height yields the MMP without the need of the additional instrumentation and labor required to perform actual IFT measurements. A total of 2-4 MMP values can be determined per day with only one experimental apparatus, and the method greatly reduces the initial cost and complexity of the required instrumentation. The use of three capillaries having different inner diameters allows for triplicate determinations of MMP from each experiment. Because the actual MMP pressure need not be reached during the experiment, MMP values that exceed the pressure ratings of the equipment can be reasonably estimated (e.g., MMPs using pure nitrogen). The method was used to determine the MMP pressure for crude oil samples from a conventional Muddy Formation reservoir in the Powder River Basin [American Petroleum Institute (API) gravity of 35.8°] and an unconventional Bakken Formation reservoir in the Williston Basin (API gravity of 38.7°). The method is reproducible [typically <4% relative standard deviation (RSD)], and the method gave good agreement for a “live” Bakken oil with the results from a slim tube test of a commercial laboratory. Approximately 80 MMP values were measured using pure CO2, methane, and ethane as well as 0-100% mole ratios of methane/CO2 and methane/ethane. For both oil samples, ethane MMPs were ca. one-half those with CO2, while methane MMPs were ca. double or triple those with CO2. MMPs with mixed methane/CO2 showed a linear increase with mole percent methane for both crude oils, while both oils showed an exponential increase in MMP with mole percent methane in ethane, with a little increase in MMP until ca. 20 mol % methane in ethane.},
doi = {10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01151},
journal = {Energy and Fuels},
number = 8,
volume = 30,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Jul 20 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Wed Jul 20 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 63 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Interfacial Behaviour of Complex Hydrocarbon Fluids at Elevated Pressures and Temperatures
journal, February 2006

  • Ayirala, Subhash C.; Xu, Wei; Rao, Dandina N.
  • The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol. 84, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450840105

A comparison of CO2 minimum miscibility pressure determinations for Weyburn crude oil
journal, October 2001


A new technique of vanishing interfacial tension for miscibility determination
journal, December 1997


Vanishing Interfacial Tension Algorithm for MMP Determination in Unconventional Reservoirs
conference, April 2014

  • Teklu, Tadesse Weldu; Alharthy, Najeeb; Kazemi, Hossein
  • SPE Western North American and Rocky Mountain Joint Meeting
  • DOI: 10.2118/169517-MS

Effects of Impurities on Minimum Miscibility Pressures and Minimum Enrichment Levels for CO2 and Rich-Gas Displacements
journal, April 1982

  • Metcalfe, R. S.
  • Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, Vol. 22, Issue 02
  • DOI: 10.2118/9230-PA

An analysis of the vanishing interfacial tension technique for determination of minimum miscibility pressure
journal, July 2007


Miscible or Near-Miscible Gas Injection, Which Is Better?
conference, April 2013

  • Thomas, F. B.; Holowach, Nancy; Zhou, XueLong
  • SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium
  • DOI: 10.2118/27811-MS

Comparative Evaluation of a New Gas/Oil Miscibility-Determination Technique
journal, September 2011

  • Ayirala, Subhash C.; Rao, Dandina N.
  • Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, Vol. 50, Issue 09
  • DOI: 10.2118/99606-PA

Rapid Measurement of Minimum Miscibility Pressure With the Rising-Bubble Apparatus
journal, November 1987

  • Christiansen, Richard L.; Haines, Hiemi Kim
  • SPE Reservoir Engineering, Vol. 2, Issue 04
  • DOI: 10.2118/13114-PA

Minimum Miscibility Pressure Studies in the Bakken
conference, April 2014

  • Adekunle, Olawale; Hoffman, B. Todd
  • SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, All Days
  • DOI: 10.2118/169077-MS

Correlation of Minimum Miscibility Pressure for Impure CO2 Streams
journal, November 1985

  • Sebastian, H. M.; Wenger, R. S.; Renner, T. A.
  • Journal of Petroleum Technology, Vol. 37, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.2118/12648-PA

Measuring CO 2 Minimum Miscibility Pressures:  Slim-Tube or Rising-Bubble Method?
journal, January 1996

  • Elsharkawy, Adel M.; Poettmann, Fred H.; Christiansen, Richard L.
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 10, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef940212f

A Rapid Method for Determining CO2/oil MMP and Visual Observations of CO2/Oil Interactions at Reservoir Conditions
journal, January 2014


Acid Gases And Their Contribution to Miscibility
journal, April 1972

  • Jacobson, H. A.
  • Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, Vol. 11, Issue 02
  • DOI: 10.2118/72-02-03

On Interfacial-Tension Measurements to Estimate Minimum Miscibility Pressures
journal, October 2008

  • Jessen, Kristian; Orr, Franklin M.
  • SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, Vol. 11, Issue 05
  • DOI: 10.2118/110725-PA

An improved method for estimating minimum miscibility pressure through condensation–extraction process under swelling tests
journal, July 2015


Determination and Prediction of CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressures (includes associated paper 8876 )
journal, January 1980

  • Yellig, W. F.; Metcalfe, R. S.
  • Journal of Petroleum Technology, Vol. 32, Issue 01
  • DOI: 10.2118/7477-PA

CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressure: A Correlation for Impure CO2 Streams and Live Oil Systems
journal, April 1985

  • Alston, R. B.; Kokolis, G. P.; James, C. F.
  • Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, Vol. 25, Issue 02
  • DOI: 10.2118/11959-PA

Measurement And Correlation Of CO2 Miscibility Pressures
conference, April 2013

  • Johnson, James P.; Pollin, James S.
  • SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium
  • DOI: 10.2118/9790-MS

Experimental Determination of Minimum Miscibility Pressure (MMP) by Gas/Oil IFT Measurements for a Gas Injection EOR Project
conference, May 2010

  • Saini, Dayanand; Rao, Dandina N.
  • SPE Western Regional Meeting, All Days
  • DOI: 10.2118/132389-MS

Nitrogen Miscible Displacement of Light Crude Oil: A Laboratory Study
journal, February 1990

  • Hudgins, David A.; Llave, Feliciano M.; Chung, Frank T. H.
  • SPE Reservoir Engineering, Vol. 5, Issue 01
  • DOI: 10.2118/17372-PA