Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States
Abstract
Capture and permanent geologic sequestration of biogenic CO2emissions may provide critical flexibility in ambitious climate change mitigation. However, most bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration (BECCS) technologies are technically immature or commercially unavailable. Here, we evaluate low-cost, commercially ready CO2capture opportunities for existing ethanol biorefineries in the United States. The analysis combines process engineering, spatial optimization, and lifecycle assessment to consider the technical, economic, and institutional feasibility of near-term carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). Our modeling framework evaluates least cost source–sink relationships and aggregation opportunities for pipeline transport, which can cost-effectively transport small CO2volumes to suitable sequestration sites; 216 existing US biorefineries emit 45 Mt CO2annually from fermentation, of which 60% could be captured and compressed for pipeline transport for under $25/tCO2. A sequestration credit, analogous to existing CCS tax credits, of $60/tCO2could incent 30 Mt of sequestration and 6,900 km of pipeline infrastructure across the United States. Similarly, a carbon abatement credit, analogous to existing tradeable CO2credits, of $90/tCO2can incent 38 Mt of abatement. Aggregation of CO2sources enables cost-effective long-distance pipeline transport to distant sequestration sites. Financial incentives under the low-carbon fuel standard in California and recent revisions to existing federal tax credits suggest a substantial near-term opportunity tomore »
- Authors:
-
- Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305,
- Energy Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria,
- Global Security E-Program, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550,, Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15253,
- Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE); David and Lucile Packard Foundation; The Alexander von Humboldt Foundation; USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1434361
- Alternate Identifier(s):
- OSTI ID: 1625009; OSTI ID: 1809174
- Report Number(s):
- LLNL-JRNL-741276
Journal ID: ISSN 0027-8424
- Grant/Contract Number:
- LLNL-17-FEW0228; AC52-07NA27344
- Resource Type:
- Published Article
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Name: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Journal Volume: 115 Journal Issue: 19; Journal ID: ISSN 0027-8424
- Publisher:
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- Science & Technology - Other Topics; carbon dioxide removal; bioenergy; climate policy; carbon capture; energy systems; 09 BIOMASS FUELS; Energy - Conversion; Geosciences; Energy - Biomass
Citation Formats
Sanchez, Daniel L., Johnson, Nils, McCoy, Sean T., Turner, Peter A., and Mach, Katharine J. Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States. United States: N. p., 2018.
Web. doi:10.1073/pnas.1719695115.
Sanchez, Daniel L., Johnson, Nils, McCoy, Sean T., Turner, Peter A., & Mach, Katharine J. Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States. United States. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719695115
Sanchez, Daniel L., Johnson, Nils, McCoy, Sean T., Turner, Peter A., and Mach, Katharine J. Mon .
"Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States". United States. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719695115.
@article{osti_1434361,
title = {Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States},
author = {Sanchez, Daniel L. and Johnson, Nils and McCoy, Sean T. and Turner, Peter A. and Mach, Katharine J.},
abstractNote = {Capture and permanent geologic sequestration of biogenic CO2emissions may provide critical flexibility in ambitious climate change mitigation. However, most bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration (BECCS) technologies are technically immature or commercially unavailable. Here, we evaluate low-cost, commercially ready CO2capture opportunities for existing ethanol biorefineries in the United States. The analysis combines process engineering, spatial optimization, and lifecycle assessment to consider the technical, economic, and institutional feasibility of near-term carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). Our modeling framework evaluates least cost source–sink relationships and aggregation opportunities for pipeline transport, which can cost-effectively transport small CO2volumes to suitable sequestration sites; 216 existing US biorefineries emit 45 Mt CO2annually from fermentation, of which 60% could be captured and compressed for pipeline transport for under $25/tCO2. A sequestration credit, analogous to existing CCS tax credits, of $60/tCO2could incent 30 Mt of sequestration and 6,900 km of pipeline infrastructure across the United States. Similarly, a carbon abatement credit, analogous to existing tradeable CO2credits, of $90/tCO2can incent 38 Mt of abatement. Aggregation of CO2sources enables cost-effective long-distance pipeline transport to distant sequestration sites. Financial incentives under the low-carbon fuel standard in California and recent revisions to existing federal tax credits suggest a substantial near-term opportunity to permanently sequester biogenic CO2. This financial opportunity could catalyze the growth of carbon capture, transport, and sequestration; improve the lifecycle impacts of conventional biofuels; support development of carbon-negative fuels; and help fulfill the mandates of low-carbon fuel policies across the United States.},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.1719695115},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
number = 19,
volume = 115,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Apr 23 00:00:00 EDT 2018},
month = {Mon Apr 23 00:00:00 EDT 2018}
}
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719695115
Web of Science
Works referenced in this record:
Investing in negative emissions
journal, May 2015
- Lomax, Guy; Lenton, Timothy M.; Adeosun, Adepeju
- Nature Climate Change, Vol. 5, Issue 6
How negative can biofuels with CCS take us and at what cost? Refining the economic potential of biofuel production with CCS using spatially-explicit modeling
journal, January 2014
- Johnson, Nils; Parker, Nathan; Ogden, Joan
- Energy Procedia, Vol. 63
CO 2 capture from the industry sector
journal, November 2017
- Bains, Praveen; Psarras, Peter; Wilcox, Jennifer
- Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 63
A dynamic model for optimally phasing in CO2 capture and storage infrastructure
journal, November 2012
- Middleton, Richard S.; Kuby, Michael J.; Wei, Ran
- Environmental Modelling & Software, Vol. 37
An overview of the Illinois Basin - Decatur Project: An overview of the Illinois Basin - Decatur Project
journal, September 2014
- Finley, Robert J.
- Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Vol. 4, Issue 5
Nationwide, Regional, and Statewide CO 2 Capture, Utilization, and Sequestration Supply Chain Network Optimization
journal, March 2014
- Hasan, M. M. Faruque; Boukouvala, Fani; First, Eric L.
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 53, Issue 18
Biomass enables the transition to a carbon-negative power system across western North America
journal, February 2015
- Sanchez, Daniel L.; Nelson, James H.; Johnston, Josiah
- Nature Climate Change, Vol. 5, Issue 3
Assessing issues of financing a CO2 transportation pipeline infrastructure
journal, February 2009
- Chrysostomidis, Ioannis; Zakkour, Paul; Bohm, Mark
- Energy Procedia, Vol. 1, Issue 1
A commercialization strategy for carbon-negative energy
journal, January 2016
- Sanchez, Daniel L.; Kammen, Daniel M.
- Nature Energy, Vol. 1, Issue 1
A scalable infrastructure model for carbon capture and storage: SimCCS
journal, March 2009
- Middleton, Richard S.; Bielicki, Jeffrey M.
- Energy Policy, Vol. 37, Issue 3
Carbon Capture and Utilization in the Industrial Sector
journal, September 2017
- Psarras, Peter C.; Comello, Stephen; Bains, Praveen
- Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 51, Issue 19
Adding value to carbon dioxide from ethanol fermentations
journal, May 2010
- Xu, Yixiang; Isom, Loren; Hanna, Milford A.
- Bioresource Technology, Vol. 101, Issue 10
Environmental impact assessment of CCS chains – Lessons learned and limitations from LCA literature
journal, March 2013
- Corsten, Mariëlle; Ramírez, Andrea; Shen, Li
- International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 13
Carbon capture and storage across fuels and sectors in energy system transformation pathways
journal, February 2017
- Muratori, Matteo; Kheshgi, Haroon; Mignone, Bryan
- International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 57
Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions
journal, December 2015
- Smith, Pete; Davis, Steven J.; Creutzig, Felix
- Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 1
The trouble with negative emissions
journal, October 2016
- Anderson, K.; Peters, G.
- Science, Vol. 354, Issue 6309
Carbon negative oil: A pathway for CO2 emission reduction goals
journal, June 2015
- Hornafius, Katherine Y.; Hornafius, J. Scott
- International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 37
Betting on negative emissions
journal, September 2014
- Fuss, Sabine; Canadell, Josep G.; Peters, Glen P.
- Nature Climate Change, Vol. 4, Issue 10
A model of state and federal biofuel policy: Feasibility assessment of the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard
journal, May 2016
- Christensen, Adam; Hobbs, Benjamin
- Applied Energy, Vol. 169
Research priorities for negative emissions
journal, November 2016
- Fuss, S.; Jones, C. D.; Kraxner, F.
- Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 11, Issue 11
Saving innovative climate and energy research: Four recommendations for Mission Innovation
journal, July 2017
- Sanchez, Daniel L.; Sivaram, Varun
- Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 29
An engineering-economic model of pipeline transport of CO2 with application to carbon capture and storage
journal, April 2008
- Mccoy, S.; Rubin, E.
- International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 2, Issue 2
A review of low carbon fuel policies: Principles, program status and future directions
journal, October 2016
- Yeh, Sonia; Witcover, Julie; Lade, Gabriel E.
- Energy Policy, Vol. 97
Improved cost models for optimizing CO2 pipeline configuration for point-to-point pipelines and simple networks
journal, March 2014
- Knoope, M. M. J.; Guijt, W.; Ramírez, A.
- International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 22