DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Regime dependence of cloud condensate variability observed at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Sites

Abstract

Microphysical processes and cloud–radiation interaction occur on spatial scales of variability smaller than those represented explicitly in global weather forecasting and climate models. It is therefore necessary to parametrize the unresolved heterogeneity of humidity and cloud condensate in order to predict process rates accurately. Ground‐based observations from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement sites located in various climatic regions of the world provide a source of high‐temporal‐resolution observations of cloud condensate. A number of different retrieval products for cloud condensate are assessed for the different geographical regions, years and seasons. The retrieval reliability varies with cloud type, but for cloud categories largely unaffected by precipitation a comparison across sites and longer time periods is possible. These observations confirm previously documented variability behaviour as a function of cloud fraction, but also reveal a systematic regime dependence that is not captured by existing parametrizations. Condensate variability measured as a fractional standard deviation (FSD) in warm boundary‐layer clouds is greater in the Tropics than in mid and high latitudes for scenes with comparable cloud type and fraction, with the observed FSD varying from 1.2 in the Tropics to 0.4 in the Arctic. A parametrization of the FSD of cloud liquid condensate based on the grid‐boxmore » mean total water amount and cloud fraction is formulated and shown to capture the observed range of FSD values better across different geographical sites and different seasons. The regime dependence of FSD for cirrus cloud is less pronounced than that for liquid clouds and is found largely to agree with FSD values previously derived from satellite observations.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1]
  1. European Centre For Medium Range Weather Forecasts Reading UK
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1401189
Grant/Contract Number:  
DE‐SC0005259
Resource Type:
Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society Journal Volume: 142 Journal Issue: 697; Journal ID: ISSN 0035-9009
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Ahlgrimm, Maike, and Forbes, Richard M. Regime dependence of cloud condensate variability observed at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Sites. United Kingdom: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1002/qj.2783.
Ahlgrimm, Maike, & Forbes, Richard M. Regime dependence of cloud condensate variability observed at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Sites. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2783
Ahlgrimm, Maike, and Forbes, Richard M. Tue . "Regime dependence of cloud condensate variability observed at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Sites". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2783.
@article{osti_1401189,
title = {Regime dependence of cloud condensate variability observed at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Sites},
author = {Ahlgrimm, Maike and Forbes, Richard M.},
abstractNote = {Microphysical processes and cloud–radiation interaction occur on spatial scales of variability smaller than those represented explicitly in global weather forecasting and climate models. It is therefore necessary to parametrize the unresolved heterogeneity of humidity and cloud condensate in order to predict process rates accurately. Ground‐based observations from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement sites located in various climatic regions of the world provide a source of high‐temporal‐resolution observations of cloud condensate. A number of different retrieval products for cloud condensate are assessed for the different geographical regions, years and seasons. The retrieval reliability varies with cloud type, but for cloud categories largely unaffected by precipitation a comparison across sites and longer time periods is possible. These observations confirm previously documented variability behaviour as a function of cloud fraction, but also reveal a systematic regime dependence that is not captured by existing parametrizations. Condensate variability measured as a fractional standard deviation (FSD) in warm boundary‐layer clouds is greater in the Tropics than in mid and high latitudes for scenes with comparable cloud type and fraction, with the observed FSD varying from 1.2 in the Tropics to 0.4 in the Arctic. A parametrization of the FSD of cloud liquid condensate based on the grid‐box mean total water amount and cloud fraction is formulated and shown to capture the observed range of FSD values better across different geographical sites and different seasons. The regime dependence of FSD for cirrus cloud is less pronounced than that for liquid clouds and is found largely to agree with FSD values previously derived from satellite observations.},
doi = {10.1002/qj.2783},
journal = {Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society},
number = 697,
volume = 142,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Tue May 10 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Tue May 10 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2783

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 10 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The CALIPSO mission: spaceborne lidar for observation of aerosols and clouds
conference, March 2003

  • Winker, David M.; Pelon, Jacques R.; McCormick, M. Patrick
  • Third International Asia-Pacific Environmental Remote Sensing Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere, Ocean, Environment, and Space, SPIE Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1117/12.466539

Evaluating statistical cloud schemes: What can we gain from ground-based remote sensing?: EVALUATING STATISTICAL CLOUD SCHEMES
journal, September 2013

  • Grützun, V.; Quaas, J.; Morcrette, C. J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50813

The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program
journal, January 2003

  • Ackerman, Thomas P.; Stokes, Gerald M.
  • Physics Today, Vol. 56, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.1554135

Differences between Nonprecipitating Tropical and Trade Wind Marine Shallow Cumuli
journal, February 2016

  • Ghate, Virendra P.; Miller, Mark A.; Zhu, Ping
  • Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 144, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-15-0110.1

CLOUDS AND MORE: ARM Climate Modeling Best Estimate Data: A New Data Product for Climate Studies
journal, January 2010

  • Xie, Shaocheng; McCoy, Renata B.; Klein, Stephen A.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 91, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1175/2009BAMS2891.1

Relationships between Total Water, Condensed Water, and Cloud Fraction in Stratiform Clouds Examined Using Aircraft Data
journal, June 2000


Toward understanding of differences in current cloud retrievals of ARM ground-based measurements: UNDERSTANDING CLOUD RETRIEVAL DIFFERENCE
journal, May 2012

  • Zhao, Chuanfeng; Xie, Shaocheng; Klein, Stephen A.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D10
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JD016792

Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment. II: Multilayer cloud
journal, April 2009

  • Morrison, Hugh; McCoy, Renata B.; Klein, Stephen A.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 135, Issue 641
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.415

Arctic Cloud Microphysics Retrievals from Surface-Based Remote Sensors at SHEBA
journal, October 2005

  • Shupe, Matthew D.; Uttal, Taneil; Matrosov, Sergey Y.
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 44, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAM2297.1

Representation of Clouds in Large-Scale Models
journal, November 1993


Scale‐aware parameterization of liquid cloud inhomogeneity and its impact on simulated climate in CESM
journal, August 2015

  • Xie, Xin; Zhang, Minghua
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 120, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023565

Toward Optimal Closure of the Earth's Top-of-Atmosphere Radiation Budget
journal, February 2009

  • Loeb, Norman G.; Wielicki, Bruce A.; Doelling, David R.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 22, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008JCLI2637.1

Subgrid-Scale Condensation in Models of Nonprecipitating Clouds
journal, February 1977


Parameterizing Ice Cloud Inhomogeneity and the Overlap of Inhomogeneities Using Cloud Radar Data
journal, March 2003


Statistical characteristics of cloud variability. Part 1: Retrieved cloud liquid water path at three ARM sites: Observed cloud variability at ARM sites
journal, September 2014

  • Huang, Dong; Campos, Edwin; Liu, Yangang
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014JD022001

Impact of a New Radiation Package, McRad, in the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System
journal, December 2008

  • Morcrette, J-J.; Barker, H. W.; Cole, J. N. S.
  • Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 136, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008MWR2363.1

The Albedo of Fractal Stratocumulus Clouds
journal, August 1994


Cloudnet: Continuous Evaluation of Cloud Profiles in Seven Operational Models Using Ground-Based Observations
journal, June 2007

  • Illingworth, A. J.; Hogan, R. J.; O'Connor, E. J.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 88, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-88-6-883

A regime-dependent parametrization of subgrid-scale cloud water content variability: Parametrizing Subgrid Cloud Water Variability
journal, March 2015

  • Hill, P. G.; Morcrette, C. J.; Boutle, I. A.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 141, Issue 691
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.2506

The Distribution of Cloud Horizontal Sizes
journal, September 2011


THE CLOUDSAT MISSION AND THE A-TRAIN: A New Dimension of Space-Based Observations of Clouds and Precipitation
journal, December 2002

  • Stephens, Graeme L.; Vane, Deborah G.; Boain, Ronald J.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 83, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-83-12-1771

Parametrizing the horizontal inhomogeneity of ice water content using CloudSat data products
journal, January 2012

  • Hill, Peter G.; Hogan, Robin J.; Manners, James
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 138, Issue 668
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.1893

A ground-based multisensor cloud phase classifier
journal, January 2007


Autoconversion rate bias in stratiform boundary layer cloud parameterizations
journal, November 2002


Subtropical Low Cloud Response to a Warmer Climate in a Superparameterized Climate Model. Part I: Regime Sorting and Physical Mechanisms: REGIME SORTING AND PHYSICAL MECHANISMS
journal, March 2009

  • Wyant, Matthew C.; Bretherton, Christopher S.; Blossey, Peter N.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 1, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.3894/JAMES.2009.1.7

Microphysical implications of cloud-precipitation covariance derived from satellite remote sensing: CLOUD-PRECIPITATION COVARIANCE
journal, June 2013

  • Lebsock, Matthew; Morrison, Hugh; Gettelman, Andrew
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50347

An intercomparison of radar-based liquid cloud microphysics retrievals and implications for model evaluation studies
journal, January 2012


Improved ground-based liquid water path retrievals using a combined infrared and microwave approach
journal, January 2007


Retrieving Liquid Wat0er Path and Precipitable Water Vapor From the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Microwave Radiometers
journal, November 2007

  • Turner, David D.; Clough, Shepard A.; Liljegren, James C.
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 45, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2007.903703

Spatial variability of liquid cloud and rain: observations and microphysical effects: Cloud and Rain Variability
journal, April 2013

  • Boutle, I. A.; Abel, S. J.; Hill, P. G.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 140, Issue 679
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.2140

Accurate Liquid Water Path Retrieval from Low-Cost Microwave Radiometers Using Additional Information from a Lidar Ceilometer and Operational Forecast Models
journal, September 2007

  • Gaussiat, Nicolas; Hogan, Robin J.; Illingworth, Anthony J.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 24, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/JTECH2053.1