DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A multi-objective optimization approach to optimal sensor location problem in $$\mathrm{IGCC}$$ power plants

Abstract

Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plants provide a cleaner and more efficient way to obtain energy from coal. In order to operate an IGCC power plant in a safe and stable manner, several input and output process parameters need to be monitored. However, due to economic and operational constraints, it is infeasible to place sensors at every input and output process parameter location. Hence, it becomes important to select the most effective sensor locations which lead to maximum information gain about the plant conditions. Practical issues present in an IGCC power plant, such as harsh physical conditions and variability in process parameters, make the optimal sensor location problem an especially complicated one. Further, sensors can have multiple objectives and they can produce uncertainties due to measurement errors. Here this work considers hybrid hardware and virtual sensing for advanced power systems with multiple objectives. In order to solve this real world large scale problem, we use a novel algorithm called Better Optimization of Nonlinear Uncertain Systems (BONUS). BONUS works in probability distribution space and avoids sampling for each optimization and derivative calculations iterations. A new algorithm for multi-objective optimization is also developed specifically for problem. The result of this nonlinearmore » stochastic multi-objective problem is the non-dominated, or Pareto set, which provides trade-offs between various objectives like observability, cost, and thermal efficiency. This is the first attempt at solving the problem of optimal sensor deployment in advanced power plants, with consideration of hybrid hardware and virtual sensing and incorporation of uncertainty with multiple objectives.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Vishwamitra Research Institute, Clarendon Hills, IL (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States); Vishwamitra Research Institute, Clarendon Hills, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE)
OSTI Identifier:
1533534
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1396986
Grant/Contract Number:  
FE0011227
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Applied Energy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 181; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0306-2619
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT; sensor placement; BONUS algorithm; multi-objective optimization; stochastic optimization

Citation Formats

Sen, Pallabi, Sen, Kinnar, and Diwekar, Urmila M. A multi-objective optimization approach to optimal sensor location problem in $\mathrm{IGCC}$ power plants. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.006.
Sen, Pallabi, Sen, Kinnar, & Diwekar, Urmila M. A multi-objective optimization approach to optimal sensor location problem in $\mathrm{IGCC}$ power plants. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.006
Sen, Pallabi, Sen, Kinnar, and Diwekar, Urmila M. Wed . "A multi-objective optimization approach to optimal sensor location problem in $\mathrm{IGCC}$ power plants". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.006. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1533534.
@article{osti_1533534,
title = {A multi-objective optimization approach to optimal sensor location problem in $\mathrm{IGCC}$ power plants},
author = {Sen, Pallabi and Sen, Kinnar and Diwekar, Urmila M.},
abstractNote = {Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plants provide a cleaner and more efficient way to obtain energy from coal. In order to operate an IGCC power plant in a safe and stable manner, several input and output process parameters need to be monitored. However, due to economic and operational constraints, it is infeasible to place sensors at every input and output process parameter location. Hence, it becomes important to select the most effective sensor locations which lead to maximum information gain about the plant conditions. Practical issues present in an IGCC power plant, such as harsh physical conditions and variability in process parameters, make the optimal sensor location problem an especially complicated one. Further, sensors can have multiple objectives and they can produce uncertainties due to measurement errors. Here this work considers hybrid hardware and virtual sensing for advanced power systems with multiple objectives. In order to solve this real world large scale problem, we use a novel algorithm called Better Optimization of Nonlinear Uncertain Systems (BONUS). BONUS works in probability distribution space and avoids sampling for each optimization and derivative calculations iterations. A new algorithm for multi-objective optimization is also developed specifically for problem. The result of this nonlinear stochastic multi-objective problem is the non-dominated, or Pareto set, which provides trade-offs between various objectives like observability, cost, and thermal efficiency. This is the first attempt at solving the problem of optimal sensor deployment in advanced power plants, with consideration of hybrid hardware and virtual sensing and incorporation of uncertainty with multiple objectives.},
doi = {10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.006},
journal = {Applied Energy},
number = C,
volume = 181,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Aug 24 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Wed Aug 24 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 16 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

On the theory of optimal sensor placement
journal, May 2002

  • Chmielewski, Donald J.; Palmer, Tasha; Manousiouthakis, Vasilios
  • AIChE Journal, Vol. 48, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/aic.690480510

Sensor Placement for Damage Detection in Nonlinear Systems Using System Augmentations
journal, October 2008

  • D'souza, Kiran; Epureanu, Bogdan I.
  • AIAA Journal, Vol. 46, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.2514/1.33493

Operation window and part-load performance study of a syngas fired gas turbine
journal, January 2012


Sensor network design for maximizing reliability of linear processes
journal, May 1993


Variable measurement structures for process control
journal, February 1981

  • Romagnoli, Jose; Alvarez, Jesus; Stephanopoulos, George
  • International Journal of Control, Vol. 33, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1080/00207178108922923

Design and retrofit of sensor networks in process plants
journal, September 1997


Sensor Location for Stable Nonlinear Dynamic Systems:  Multiple Sensor Case
journal, May 2006

  • Singh, Abhay K.; Hahn, Juergen
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 45, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1021/ie0511175

A simple design strategy for fault monitoring systems
journal, July 1993

  • Chang, Chuei‐Tin; Mah, Kai‐Nan; Tsai, Chii‐Shiang
  • AIChE Journal, Vol. 39, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/aic.690390707

Optimal Sensor Placement for Predictive Cardiac Motion Modeling
book, January 2006

  • Wu, Qian; Chung, Adrian J.; Yang, Guang-Zhong
  • Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2006
  • DOI: 10.1007/11866763_63

On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoretical Statistics
journal, January 1922

  • Fisher, R. A.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 222, Issue 594-604
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1922.0009

Optimal sensor placement for spatial lattice structure based on genetic algorithms
journal, October 2008


Optimal sensor location and reduced order observer design for distributed process systems
journal, January 2004

  • Alonso, Antonio A.; Kevrekidis, Ioannis G.; Banga, Julio R.
  • Computers & Chemical Engineering, Vol. 28, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1016/S0098-1354(03)00175-3

Wireless Sensor Network Optimization: Multi-Objective Paradigm
journal, July 2015

  • Iqbal, Muhammad; Naeem, Muhammad; Anpalagan, Alagan
  • Sensors, Vol. 15, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.3390/s150717572

Advanced simulation environment for clean power production in IGCC plants
journal, August 2011


Fault measurement detection in an urban water supply network
journal, October 2006


Robust design using an efficient sampling technique
journal, January 1996


On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure
journal, August 2005


A sensorlocation procedure for chemical processes
journal, January 1984


An Efficient Sampling Technique for Off-line Quality Control
journal, August 1997


Sensor network design for maximizing process efficiency: An algorithm and its application
journal, October 2014

  • Paul, Prokash; Bhattacharyya, Debangsu; Turton, Richard
  • AIChE Journal, Vol. 61, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/aic.14649

Sensor Placement in Water Networks: A Stochastic Programming Approach
journal, May 2006


Optimal sensor location problem for a linear distributed parameter system
journal, August 1978

  • Omatu, S.; Koide, S.; Soeda, T.
  • IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 23, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1109/TAC.1978.1101826

Optimal sensor location with an application to a packed bed tubular reactor
journal, November 1980

  • Harris, T. J.; Macgregor, J. F.; Wright, J. D.
  • AIChE Journal, Vol. 26, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/aic.690260605

Water networks security: A two-stage mixed-integer stochastic program for sensor placement under uncertainty
journal, May 2007


Sensor Placement in Municipal Water Networks
journal, May 2005


A new and improved MILP formulation to optimize observability, redundancy and precision for sensor network problems
journal, March 2008

  • Kelly, Jeffrey D.; Zyngier, Danielle
  • AIChE Journal, Vol. 54, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/aic.11475

Optimal sensor locations for tubular-flow reactor systems
journal, January 1977


Optimal sensor placement in integrated gasification combined cycle power systems
journal, November 2012


An Outer-Approximation based algorithm for solving integer non-linear programming problems for Optimal Sensor Placement
conference, December 2012

  • Seenumani, Gayathri; Dai, Dan; Lopez-Negrete, Rodrigo
  • 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)
  • DOI: 10.1109/CDC.2012.6426360

Acoustic Based Structural Health Monitoring for Composites Using Optimal Sensor Placement: Analysis and Experiments
journal, July 2008

  • Das, Santanu; Chattopadhyay, Aditi
  • Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, Vol. 28, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1177/0731684407084099

Performance evaluation of integrated gasification solid oxide fuel cell/gas turbine systems including carbon dioxide capture
journal, September 2011


Optimal measurement system design for chemical processes
journal, June 2003


Optimal location of measurements in tubular reactors
journal, January 1978


Optimal selection of measuring points in complex plants by linear models
journal, February 1992