DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Technical note: 3-hourly temporal downscaling of monthly global terrestrial biosphere model net ecosystem exchange

Abstract

Here, the land surface provides a boundary condition to atmospheric forward and flux inversion models. These models require prior estimates of CO2 fluxes at relatively high temporal resolutions (e.g., 3-hourly) because of the high frequency of atmospheric mixing and wind heterogeneity. However, land surface model CO2 fluxes are often provided at monthly time steps, typically because the land surface modeling community focuses more on time steps associated with plant phenology (e.g., seasonal) than on sub-daily phenomena. Here, we describe a new dataset created from 15 global land surface models and 4 ensemble products in the Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP), temporally downscaled from monthly to 3-hourly output. We provide 3-hourly output for each individual model over 7 years (2004–2010), as well as an ensemble mean, a weighted ensemble mean, and the multi-model standard deviation. Output is provided in three different spatial resolutions for user preferences: 0.5° × 0.5°, 2.0° × 2.5°, and 4.0° × 5.0° (latitude × longitude).

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [3];  [1]
  1. California Inst. of Technology (CalTech), Pasadena, CA (United States)
  2. Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, AZ (United States)
  3. Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, MA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
California Institute of Technology (CalTech), Pasadena, CA (United States). Jet Propulsion Lab. (JPL)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1375425
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Biogeosciences (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Biogeosciences (Online); Journal Volume: 13; Journal Issue: 14; Journal ID: ISSN 1726-4189
Publisher:
European Geosciences Union
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES; 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Citation Formats

Fisher, Joshua B., Sikka, Munish, Huntzinger, Deborah N., Schwalm, Christopher, and Liu, Junjie. Technical note: 3-hourly temporal downscaling of monthly global terrestrial biosphere model net ecosystem exchange. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.5194/bg-13-4271-2016.
Fisher, Joshua B., Sikka, Munish, Huntzinger, Deborah N., Schwalm, Christopher, & Liu, Junjie. Technical note: 3-hourly temporal downscaling of monthly global terrestrial biosphere model net ecosystem exchange. United States. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4271-2016
Fisher, Joshua B., Sikka, Munish, Huntzinger, Deborah N., Schwalm, Christopher, and Liu, Junjie. Fri . "Technical note: 3-hourly temporal downscaling of monthly global terrestrial biosphere model net ecosystem exchange". United States. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4271-2016. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1375425.
@article{osti_1375425,
title = {Technical note: 3-hourly temporal downscaling of monthly global terrestrial biosphere model net ecosystem exchange},
author = {Fisher, Joshua B. and Sikka, Munish and Huntzinger, Deborah N. and Schwalm, Christopher and Liu, Junjie},
abstractNote = {Here, the land surface provides a boundary condition to atmospheric forward and flux inversion models. These models require prior estimates of CO2 fluxes at relatively high temporal resolutions (e.g., 3-hourly) because of the high frequency of atmospheric mixing and wind heterogeneity. However, land surface model CO2 fluxes are often provided at monthly time steps, typically because the land surface modeling community focuses more on time steps associated with plant phenology (e.g., seasonal) than on sub-daily phenomena. Here, we describe a new dataset created from 15 global land surface models and 4 ensemble products in the Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP), temporally downscaled from monthly to 3-hourly output. We provide 3-hourly output for each individual model over 7 years (2004–2010), as well as an ensemble mean, a weighted ensemble mean, and the multi-model standard deviation. Output is provided in three different spatial resolutions for user preferences: 0.5° × 0.5°, 2.0° × 2.5°, and 4.0° × 5.0° (latitude × longitude).},
doi = {10.5194/bg-13-4271-2016},
journal = {Biogeosciences (Online)},
number = 14,
volume = 13,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Jul 29 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Fri Jul 29 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 12 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

CMS: Modeled Net Ecosystem Exchange at 3-hourly Time Steps, 2004-2010
collection, January 2016

  • Fisher, J. B.; Sikka, M.; Huntzinger, D. N.
  • ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center
  • DOI: 10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1315

Seasonal drought stress in the Amazon: Reconciling models and observations: TAPAJOS km 83 NEE ANNUAL CYCLE
journal, March 2008

  • Baker, I. T.; Prihodko, L.; Denning, A. S.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Vol. 113, Issue G1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JG000644

FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem–Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities
journal, November 2001


Inferring regional sources and sinks of atmospheric CO 2 from GOSAT XCO 2 data
journal, January 2014

  • Deng, F.; Jones, D. B. A.; Henze, D. K.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 14, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-3703-2014

Modeling the Terrestrial Biosphere
journal, October 2014


The need for “apples-to-apples” comparisons of carbon dioxide source and sink estimates
journal, October 2012

  • Hayes, Daniel; Turner, David
  • Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, Vol. 93, Issue 41
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012EO410007

Is the northern high-latitude land-based CO 2 sink weakening? : THE HIGH-LATITUDE CO
journal, August 2011

  • Hayes, D. J.; McGuire, A. D.; Kicklighter, D. W.
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 25, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010GB003813

Analysis of nitrogen controls on carbon and water exchanges in a conifer forest using the CLASS-CTEMN+ model
journal, October 2011


The North American Carbon Program Multi-Scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 1: Overview and experimental design
journal, January 2013

  • Huntzinger, D. N.; Schwalm, C.; Michalak, A. M.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 6, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-6-2121-2013

A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere system: DVGM FOR COUPLED CLIMATE STUDIES
journal, February 2005

  • Krinner, G.; Viovy, Nicolas; de Noblet-Ducoudré, Nathalie
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 19, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2003GB002199

Sensitivity of global terrestrial gross primary production to hydrologic states simulated by the Community Land Model using two runoff parameterizations
journal, August 2014

  • Lei, Huimin; Huang, Maoyi; Leung, L. Ruby
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 6, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013MS000252

Carbon monitoring system flux estimation and attribution: impact of ACOS-GOSAT X CO 2 sampling on the inference of terrestrial biospheric sources and sinks
journal, January 2014

  • Liu, Junjie; Bowman, Kevin W.; Lee, Meemong
  • Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, Vol. 66, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3402/tellusb.v66.22486

Remote Sensing Evaluation of CLM4 GPP for the Period 2000–09
journal, August 2012


Differences between surface and column atmospheric CO 2 and implications for carbon cycle research
journal, January 2004


TRIPLEX: a generic hybrid model for predicting forest growth and carbon and nitrogen dynamics
journal, July 2002


Parameter and prediction uncertainty in an optimized terrestrial carbon cycle model: Effects of constraining variables and data record length
journal, January 2011

  • Ricciuto, Daniel M.; King, Anthony W.; Dragoni, D.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 116, Issue G1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010JG001400

Combined Simple Biosphere/Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach terrestrial carbon cycle model
journal, January 2008

  • Schaefer, Kevin; Collatz, G. James; Tans, Pieter
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 113, Issue G3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JG000603

Toward “optimal” integration of terrestrial biosphere models
journal, June 2015

  • Schwalm, Christopher R.; Huntzinger, Deborah N.; Fisher, Joshua B.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GL064002

Development of a 50-Year High-Resolution Global Dataset of Meteorological Forcings for Land Surface Modeling
journal, July 2006

  • Sheffield, Justin; Goteti, Gopi; Wood, Eric F.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3790.1

Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model
journal, February 2003


Modeling and measuring the effects of disturbance history and climate on carbon and water budgets in evergreen needleleaf forests
journal, December 2002


Century-Scale Responses of Ecosystem Carbon Storage and Flux to Multiple Environmental Changes in the Southern United States
journal, April 2012


The WFDEI meteorological forcing data set: WATCH Forcing Data methodology applied to ERA-Interim reanalysis data
journal, September 2014

  • Weedon, Graham P.; Balsamo, Gianpaolo; Bellouin, Nicolas
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 50, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014WR015638

The North American Carbon Program Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 2: Environmental driver data
journal, January 2014

  • Wei, Y.; Liu, S.; Huntzinger, D. N.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 7, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-7-2875-2014

Impact of 1998-2002 midlatitude drought and warming on terrestrial ecosystem and the global carbon cycle: DROUGHT AND CO
journal, November 2005

  • Zeng, Ning; Qian, Haifeng; Roedenbeck, Christian
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 32, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.1029/2005GL024607

The WFDEI Meteorological Forcing Data
dataset, January 2018

  • Weedon, Graham P.; Balsamo, G.; Bellouin, N.
  • UCAR/NCAR - Research Data Archive
  • DOI: 10.5065/486n-8109

Creation of the WATCH Forcing Data and Its Use to Assess Global and Regional Reference Crop Evaporation over Land during the Twentieth Century
journal, October 2011

  • Weedon, G. P.; Gomes, S.; Viterbo, P.
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 12, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011jhm1369.1

The North American Carbon Program Multi-scale synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 1: Overview and experimental design
journal, January 2013

  • Huntzinger, D. N.; Schwalm, C.; Michalak, A. M.
  • Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 6, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-6-3977-2013

The North American Carbon Program Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 2: Environmental driver data
journal, January 2013

  • Wei, Y.; Liu, S.; Huntzinger, D. N.
  • Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 6, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-6-5375-2013

Inferring regional sources and sinks of atmospheric CO₂ from GOSAT XCO₂ data
text, January 2014


Works referencing / citing this record:

A Road Map for Improving the Treatment of Uncertainties in High‐Resolution Regional Carbon Flux Inverse Estimates
journal, November 2019

  • Feng, Sha; Lauvaux, Thomas; Keller, Klaus
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 46, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019gl082987

Seasonal Characteristics of Model Uncertainties From Biogenic Fluxes, Transport, and Large‐Scale Boundary Inflow in Atmospheric CO 2 Simulations Over North America
journal, December 2019

  • Feng, Sha; Lauvaux, Thomas; Davis, Kenneth J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 124, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019jd031165

Characterizing biospheric carbon balance using CO 2 observations from the OCO-2 satellite
journal, January 2018

  • Miller, Scot M.; Michalak, Anna M.; Yadav, Vineet
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-6785-2018