DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6

Abstract

Projections of future climate change play a fundamental role in improving understanding of the climate system as well as characterizing societal risks and response options. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) is the primary activity within Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) that will provide multi-model climate projections based on alternative scenarios of future emissions and land use changes produced with integrated assessment models. Here, we describe ScenarioMIP's objectives, experimental design, and its relation to other activities within CMIP6. The ScenarioMIP design is one component of a larger scenario process that aims to facilitate a wide range of integrated studies across the climate science, integrated assessment modeling, and impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability communities, and will form an important part of the evidence base in the forthcoming Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessments. Furthermore, it will provide the basis for investigating a number of targeted science and policy questions that are especially relevant to scenario-based analysis, including the role of specific forcings such as land use and aerosols, the effect of a peak and decline in forcing, the consequences of scenarios that limit warming to below 2°C, the relative contributions to uncertainty from scenarios, climate models, andmore » internal variability, and long-term climate system outcomes beyond the 21st century. In order to serve this wide range of scientific communities and address these questions, a design has been identified consisting of eight alternative 21st century scenarios plus one large initial condition ensemble and a set of long-term extensions, divided into two tiers defined by relative priority. Some of these scenarios will also provide a basis for variants planned to be run in other CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs to investigate questions related to specific forcings. Harmonized, spatially explicit emissions and land use scenarios generated with integrated assessment models will be provided to participating climate modeling groups by late 2016, with the climate model simulations run within the 2017–2018 time frame, and output from the climate model projections made available and analyses performed over the 2018–2020 period.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [1];  [8];  [1];  [9];  [10];  [1]
  1. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO (United States)
  2. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), The Hague (Netherlands); Univ. of Utrecht (Netherlands). Copernicus Inst. for Sustainable Development
  3. German Aerospace Center (DLR), Oberfaffenhofen (Germany). Inst. of Atmospheric Physics
  4. Univ. of Exeter (United Kingdom)
  5. Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD (United States)
  6. ETH Zurich (Switzerland). Inst. for Atmospheric and Climate Science
  7. Potsdam Inst. for Climate Impact Research (PIK) (Germany)
  8. Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter (United Kingdom)
  9. Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD (United States). Pacific Northwest National Lab Joint Global Change Research Inst.
  10. International Inst. for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg (Austria); Graz Univ. of Technology (Austria)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR), Boulder, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
OSTI Identifier:
1360743
Grant/Contract Number:  
FC02-97ER62402
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Geoscientific Model Development (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Geoscientific Model Development (Online); Journal Volume: 9; Journal Issue: 9; Journal ID: ISSN 1991-9603
Publisher:
European Geosciences Union
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Citation Formats

O'Neill, Brian C., Tebaldi, Claudia, van Vuuren, Detlef P., Eyring, Veronika, Friedlingstein, Pierre, Hurtt, George, Knutti, Reto, Kriegler, Elmar, Lamarque, Jean-Francois, Lowe, Jason, Meehl, Gerald A., Moss, Richard, Riahi, Keywan, and Sanderson, Benjamin M. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016.
O'Neill, Brian C., Tebaldi, Claudia, van Vuuren, Detlef P., Eyring, Veronika, Friedlingstein, Pierre, Hurtt, George, Knutti, Reto, Kriegler, Elmar, Lamarque, Jean-Francois, Lowe, Jason, Meehl, Gerald A., Moss, Richard, Riahi, Keywan, & Sanderson, Benjamin M. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. United States. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016
O'Neill, Brian C., Tebaldi, Claudia, van Vuuren, Detlef P., Eyring, Veronika, Friedlingstein, Pierre, Hurtt, George, Knutti, Reto, Kriegler, Elmar, Lamarque, Jean-Francois, Lowe, Jason, Meehl, Gerald A., Moss, Richard, Riahi, Keywan, and Sanderson, Benjamin M. Wed . "The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6". United States. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1360743.
@article{osti_1360743,
title = {The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6},
author = {O'Neill, Brian C. and Tebaldi, Claudia and van Vuuren, Detlef P. and Eyring, Veronika and Friedlingstein, Pierre and Hurtt, George and Knutti, Reto and Kriegler, Elmar and Lamarque, Jean-Francois and Lowe, Jason and Meehl, Gerald A. and Moss, Richard and Riahi, Keywan and Sanderson, Benjamin M.},
abstractNote = {Projections of future climate change play a fundamental role in improving understanding of the climate system as well as characterizing societal risks and response options. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) is the primary activity within Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) that will provide multi-model climate projections based on alternative scenarios of future emissions and land use changes produced with integrated assessment models. Here, we describe ScenarioMIP's objectives, experimental design, and its relation to other activities within CMIP6. The ScenarioMIP design is one component of a larger scenario process that aims to facilitate a wide range of integrated studies across the climate science, integrated assessment modeling, and impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability communities, and will form an important part of the evidence base in the forthcoming Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessments. Furthermore, it will provide the basis for investigating a number of targeted science and policy questions that are especially relevant to scenario-based analysis, including the role of specific forcings such as land use and aerosols, the effect of a peak and decline in forcing, the consequences of scenarios that limit warming to below 2°C, the relative contributions to uncertainty from scenarios, climate models, and internal variability, and long-term climate system outcomes beyond the 21st century. In order to serve this wide range of scientific communities and address these questions, a design has been identified consisting of eight alternative 21st century scenarios plus one large initial condition ensemble and a set of long-term extensions, divided into two tiers defined by relative priority. Some of these scenarios will also provide a basis for variants planned to be run in other CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs to investigate questions related to specific forcings. Harmonized, spatially explicit emissions and land use scenarios generated with integrated assessment models will be provided to participating climate modeling groups by late 2016, with the climate model simulations run within the 2017–2018 time frame, and output from the climate model projections made available and analyses performed over the 2018–2020 period.},
doi = {10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016},
journal = {Geoscientific Model Development (Online)},
number = 9,
volume = 9,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Sep 28 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Wed Sep 28 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 1651 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Ensemble flood risk assessment in Europe under high end climate scenarios
journal, November 2015


Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle
journal, September 2002


Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives
journal, January 2017


September sea-ice cover in the Arctic Ocean projected to vanish by 2100
journal, March 2009

  • Boé, Julien; Hall, Alex; Qu, Xin
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 2, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo467

On the Robustness of Emergent Constraints Used in Multimodel Climate Change Projections of Arctic Warming
journal, January 2013


International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios
journal, December 2009


Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability
journal, February 2013

  • Cox, Peter M.; Pearson, David; Booth, Ben B.
  • Nature, Vol. 494, Issue 7437
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature11882

Long-term economic growth projections in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways
journal, January 2017


New climate and socio-economic scenarios for assessing global human health challenges due to heat risk
journal, March 2015


Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization
journal, January 2016

  • Eyring, Veronika; Bony, Sandrine; Meehl, Gerald A.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016

A Less Cloudy Future: The Role of Subtropical Subsidence in Climate Sensitivity
journal, November 2012


Recent Progress in Constraining Climate Sensitivity With Model Ensembles
journal, August 2015

  • Fasullo, J. T.; Sanderson, B. M.; Trenberth, K. E.
  • Current Climate Change Reports, Vol. 1, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s40641-015-0021-7

Using the current seasonal cycle to constrain snow albedo feedback in future climate change
journal, January 2006


21st century United States emissions mitigation could increase water stress more than the climate change it is mitigating
journal, August 2015

  • Hejazi, Mohamad I.; Voisin, Nathalie; Liu, Lu
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 112, Issue 34
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1421675112

Improved pattern scaling approaches for the use in climate impact studies: IMPROVED PATTERN SCALING APPROACHES
journal, May 2015

  • Herger, Nadja; Sanderson, Benjamin M.; Knutti, Reto
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GL063569

Constraints on Climate Sensitivity from Radiation Patterns in Climate Models
journal, February 2011

  • Huber, Markus; Mahlstein, Irina; Wild, Martin
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/2010JCLI3403.1

Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways
journal, January 2017


C4MIP – The Coupled Climate–Carbon Cycle Model Intercomparison Project: experimental protocol for CMIP6
journal, January 2016

  • Jones, Chris D.; Arora, Vivek; Friedlingstein, Pierre
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-2853-2016

Emergent Constraints for Cloud Feedbacks
journal, October 2015


Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections
journal, October 2012


Constraining Climate Sensitivity from the Seasonal Cycle in Surface Temperature
journal, September 2006

  • Knutti, Reto; Meehl, Gerald A.; Allen, Myles R.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3865.1

The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (GeoMIP6): simulation design and preliminary results
journal, January 2015

  • Kravitz, B.; Robock, A.; Tilmes, S.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 8, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-8-3379-2015

The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: A new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways
journal, October 2012


A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions
journal, January 2014


The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies
journal, January 2014

  • Kriegler, Elmar; Weyant, John P.; Blanford, Geoffrey J.
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 123, Issue 3-4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0953-7

The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6: rationale and experimental design
journal, January 2016

  • Lawrence, David M.; Hurtt, George C.; Arneth, Almut
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-2973-2016

September Arctic sea ice predicted to disappear near 2°C global warming above present: ARCTIC SEA ICE TO DISAPPEAR NEAR 2°C
journal, March 2012

  • Mahlstein, Irina; Knutti, Reto
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JD016709

Constraining projections of summer Arctic sea ice
journal, January 2012


THE WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change Research
journal, September 2007

  • Meehl, Gerald A.; Covey, Curt; Delworth, Thomas
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 88, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1383

Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 – Part 1: Model description and calibration
journal, January 2011

  • Meinshausen, M.; Raper, S. C. B.; Wigley, T. M. L.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-1417-2011

Emulating atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 – Part 2: Applications
journal, January 2011

  • Meinshausen, M.; Wigley, T. M. L.; Raper, S. C. B.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-1457-2011

The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300
journal, August 2011


Historical greenhouse gas concentrations
journal, August 2016

  • Meinshausen, Malte; Vogel, Elisabeth; Nauels, Alexander
  • Geoscientific Model Development Discussions
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-2016-169

The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment
journal, February 2010

  • Moss, Richard H.; Edmonds, Jae A.; Hibbard, Kathy A.
  • Nature, Vol. 463, Issue 7282
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature08823

Developing Climate Model Comparisons: Experimental Design for CMIP6: Aerosols, Land Use, and Future Scenarios; Aspen, Colorado, 4-8 August 2014
journal, December 2014

  • O'Neill, Brian C.; Lamarque, Jean-Francois; Lawrence, David
  • Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, Vol. 95, Issue 49
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014EO490008

A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways
journal, October 2013


The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century
journal, January 2017


Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways
journal, January 2017


Locked into Copenhagen pledges — Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals
journal, January 2015


The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview
journal, January 2017


Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C
journal, May 2015

  • Rogelj, Joeri; Luderer, Gunnar; Pietzcker, Robert C.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 5, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2572

The Vulnerability, Impacts, Adaptation, and Climate Services (VIACS) Advisory Board for CMIP6
journal, April 2016

  • Ruane, Alex C.; Teichmann, Claas; Arnell, Nigell
  • Geoscientific Model Development Discussions
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-2016-71

Spread in model climate sensitivity traced to atmospheric convective mixing
journal, January 2014

  • Sherwood, Steven C.; Bony, Sandrine; Dufresne, Jean-Louis
  • Nature, Vol. 505, Issue 7481
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature12829

An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
journal, April 2012

  • Taylor, Karl E.; Stouffer, Ronald J.; Meehl, Gerald A.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 93, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1

Pattern scaling: Its strengths and limitations, and an update on the latest model simulations
journal, January 2014


Sensitivity of regional climate to global temperature and forcing
journal, July 2015

  • Tebaldi, Claudia; O’Neill, Brian; Lamarque, Jean-François
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 10, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/074001

The representative concentration pathways: an overview
journal, August 2011


A special issue on the RCPs
journal, August 2011

  • van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Edmonds, James A.; Kainuma, Mikiko
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 109, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0157-y

A proposal for a new scenario framework to support research and assessment in different climate research communities
journal, February 2012


A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: scenario matrix architecture
journal, October 2013

  • van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Kriegler, Elmar; O’Neill, Brian C.
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 122, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0906-1

Emergent constraints on climate-carbon cycle feedbacks in the CMIP5 Earth system models
journal, May 2014

  • Wenzel, Sabrina; Cox, Peter M.; Eyring, Veronika
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Vol. 119, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JG002591

Constraining Future Summer Austral Jet Stream Positions in the CMIP5 Ensemble by Process-Oriented Multiple Diagnostic Regression
journal, January 2016

  • Wenzel, Sabrina; Eyring, Veronika; Gerber, Edwin P.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 29, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0412.1

AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6
journal, January 2017

  • Collins, William J.; Lamarque, Jean-François; Schulz, Michael
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 10, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017

Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organisation
journal, January 2015

  • Eyring, V.; Bony, S.; Meehl, G. A.
  • Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 8, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-8-10539-2015

Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project (ISMIP6) contribution to CMIP6
journal, January 2016

  • Nowicki, Sophie M. J.; Payne, Anthony; Larour, Eric
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-4521-2016

The Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP): experimental protocol for CMIP6
journal, January 2016

  • Pincus, Robert; Forster, Piers M.; Stevens, Bjorn
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-3447-2016

The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6: Rationale and experimental design
text, January 2016


Emulating atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 - Part 2: Applications
other, January 2011

  • Meinshausen, M.; Raper, S. C. B.; Wigley, T. M. L.
  • München : European Geopyhsical Union
  • DOI: 10.34657/905

A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared climate policy assumptions
other, January 2014

  • Kriegler, Elmar; Edmonds, Jae; Hallegatte, Stéphane
  • Heidelberg : Springer
  • DOI: 10.34657/741

The representative concentration pathways: an overview
journal, August 2011


The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300
journal, August 2011


A special issue on the RCPs
journal, August 2011

  • van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Edmonds, James A.; Kainuma, Mikiko
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 109, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0157-y

A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways
journal, October 2013


The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies
journal, January 2014

  • Kriegler, Elmar; Weyant, John P.; Blanford, Geoffrey J.
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 123, Issue 3-4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0953-7

Pattern scaling: Its strengths and limitations, and an update on the latest model simulations
journal, January 2014


Recent Progress in Constraining Climate Sensitivity With Model Ensembles
journal, August 2015

  • Fasullo, J. T.; Sanderson, B. M.; Trenberth, K. E.
  • Current Climate Change Reports, Vol. 1, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s40641-015-0021-7

A proposal for a new scenario framework to support research and assessment in different climate research communities
journal, February 2012


Constraints on the transient climate response from observed global temperature and ocean heat uptake
journal, January 2008

  • Knutti, Reto; Tomassini, Lorenzo
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 35, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007gl032904

Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C
journal, May 2015

  • Rogelj, Joeri; Luderer, Gunnar; Pietzcker, Robert C.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 5, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2572

The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6: rationale and experimental design
journal, January 2016

  • Lawrence, David M.; Hurtt, George C.; Arneth, Almut
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-2973-2016

The Vulnerability, Impacts, Adaptation and Climate Services Advisory Board (VIACS AB v1.0) contribution to CMIP6
journal, January 2016

  • Ruane, Alex C.; Teichmann, Claas; Arnell, Nigel W.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-3493-2016

Works referencing / citing this record:

Effects of Ensemble Configuration on Estimates of Regional Climate Uncertainties
journal, January 2018

  • Goldenson, N.; Mauger, G.; Leung, L. R.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 45, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017gl076297

Characterizing half-a-degree difference: a review of methods for identifying regional climate responses to global warming targets: Characterizing half-a-degree difference
journal, January 2017

  • James, Rachel; Washington, Richard; Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 8, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/wcc.457

Understanding Intermodel Diversity of CMIP5 Climate Models in Simulating East Asian Marginal Sea Surface Temperature in the Near Future (2020–2049)
journal, August 2019

  • Yi, Dong‐Won; Yeh, Sang‐Wook
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, Vol. 124, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019jc015028

Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading
journal, January 2020


Societal decisions about climate mitigation will have dramatic impacts on eutrophication in the 21st century
journal, February 2019


Global projections of future urban land expansion under shared socioeconomic pathways
journal, January 2020


Defining climate change scenario characteristics with a phase space of cumulative primary energy and carbon intensity
journal, February 2018


Changing population dynamics and uneven temperature emergence combine to exacerbate regional exposure to heat extremes under 1.5 °C and 2 °C of warming
journal, February 2018

  • Harrington, Luke J.; Otto, Friederike E. L.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaaa99

Differences, or lack thereof, in wheat and maize yields under three low-warming scenarios
journal, May 2018


Global energy growth is outpacing decarbonization
journal, December 2018

  • Jackson, R. B.; Le Quéré, C.; Andrew, R. M.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaf303

Mid-21st century ozone air quality and health burden in China under emissions scenarios and climate change
journal, July 2019

  • Westervelt, D. M.; Ma, C. T.; He, M. Z.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab260b

Recent recovery of the boreal spring sensible heating over the Tibetan Plateau will continue in CMIP6 future projections
journal, December 2019

  • Wang, Meirong; Wang, Jun; Chen, Deliang
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab57a3

Impact of climate and population change on temperature-related mortality burden in Bavaria, Germany
journal, December 2019

  • Rai, Masna; Breitner, Susanne; Wolf, Kathrin
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab5ca6

Humans drive future water scarcity changes across all Shared Socioeconomic Pathways
journal, January 2020

  • Graham, Neal T.; Hejazi, Mohamad I.; Chen, Min
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 15, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab639b

Thermal bottlenecks in the life cycle define climate vulnerability of fish
journal, July 2020


Quantifying the impact of current and future concentrations of air pollutants on respiratory disease risk in England
journal, March 2017


pyam: a Python Package for the Analysis and Visualization of Models of the Interaction of Climate, Human, and Environmental Systems
journal, January 2019

  • Gidden, Matthew; Huppmann, Daniel
  • Journal of Open Source Software, Vol. 4, Issue 33
  • DOI: 10.21105/joss.01095

Assessing Hydrological Effects of Bioretention Cells for Urban Stormwater Runoff in Response to Climatic Changes
journal, May 2019

  • Wang, Mo; Zhang, Dongqing; Lou, Siwei
  • Water, Vol. 11, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.3390/w11050997

Model simulation of ammonium and nitrate aerosols distribution in the Euro-Mediterranean region and their radiative and climatic effects over 1979–2016
journal, January 2019

  • Drugé, Thomas; Nabat, Pierre; Mallet, Marc
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-3707-2019

Global drought and severe drought-affected populations in 1.5 and 2 °C warmer worlds
journal, January 2018


Compiled records of carbon isotopes in atmospheric CO 2 for historical simulations in CMIP6
journal, January 2017

  • Graven, Heather; Allison, Colin E.; Etheridge, David M.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 10, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-4405-2017

AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6
journal, January 2017

  • Collins, William J.; Lamarque, Jean-François; Schulz, Michael
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 10, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017

The Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDRMIP): rationale and experimental protocol for CMIP6
journal, January 2018

  • Keller, David P.; Lenton, Andrew; Scott, Vivian
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-11-1133-2018

The Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) contribution to CMIP6: investigating the causes and consequences of polar amplification
journal, January 2019

  • Smith, Doug M.; Screen, James A.; Deser, Clara
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-1139-2019

Global emissions pathways under different socioeconomic scenarios for use in CMIP6: a dataset of harmonized emissions trajectories through the end of the century
journal, January 2019

  • Gidden, Matthew J.; Riahi, Keywan; Smith, Steven J.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-1443-2019

First forcing estimates from the future CMIP6 scenarios of anthropogenic aerosol optical properties and an associated Twomey effect
journal, January 2019

  • Fiedler, Stephanie; Stevens, Bjorn; Gidden, Matthew
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-989-2019

The CMIP6 Data Request (DREQ, version 01.00.31)
journal, January 2020

  • Juckes, Martin; Taylor, Karl E.; Durack, Paul J.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 13, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-13-201-2020

The Model Intercomparison Project on the climatic response to Volcanic forcing (VolMIP): experimental design and forcing input data for CMIP6
journal, January 2016

  • Zanchettin, Davide; Khodri, Myriam; Timmreck, Claudia
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-2701-2016

LS3MIP (v1.0) contribution to CMIP6: the Land Surface, Snow and Soil moisture Model Intercomparison Project – aims, setup and expected outcome
journal, January 2016

  • van den Hurk, Bart; Kim, Hyungjun; Krinner, Gerhard
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-2809-2016

The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6: rationale and experimental design
journal, January 2016

  • Lawrence, David M.; Hurtt, George C.; Arneth, Almut
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-2973-2016

The CMIP6 Sea-Ice Model Intercomparison Project (SIMIP): understanding sea ice through climate-model simulations
journal, January 2016

  • Notz, Dirk; Jahn, Alexandra; Holland, Marika
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-3427-2016

The Decadal Climate Prediction Project (DCPP) contribution to CMIP6
journal, January 2016

  • Boer, George J.; Smith, Douglas M.; Cassou, Christophe
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-3751-2016

Sea Ice Targeted Geoengineering Can Delay Arctic Sea Ice Decline but not Global Warming
journal, December 2019


Gridded emissions and land-use data for 2005–2100 under diverse socioeconomic and climate mitigation scenarios
journal, October 2018

  • Fujimori, Shinichiro; Hasegawa, Tomoko; Ito, Akihiko
  • Scientific Data, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.210

Eutrophication will increase during the 21st century as a result of precipitation changes
journal, July 2017


Characterizing half-a-degree difference: a review of methods for identifying regional climate responses to global warming targets
text, January 2017


Studying the impact of biomass burning aerosol radiative and climate effects on the Amazon rainforest productivity with an Earth system model
journal, January 2019

  • Malavelle, Florent F.; Haywood, Jim M.; Mercado, Lina M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-1301-2019

The Dynamics and Variability Model Intercomparison Project (DynVarMIP) for CMIP6: assessing the stratosphere–troposphere system
journal, January 2016


Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project (ISMIP6) contribution to CMIP6
journal, January 2016

  • Nowicki, Sophie M. J.; Payne, Anthony; Larour, Eric
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-4521-2016

The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6: Rationale and experimental design
text, January 2016


Volcanic Radiative Forcing From 1979 to 2015
text, January 2018

  • Schmidt, Anja; Mills, Mj; Ghan, S.
  • Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
  • DOI: 10.17863/cam.34008

Model simulation of ammonium and nitrate aerosols distribution in the Euro-Mediterranean region and their radiative and climatic effects over 1979-2016
journal, December 2018

  • Druge, Thomas; Nabat, Pierre; Mallet, Marc
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-2018-1101

Framework for High-End Estimates of Sea Level Rise for Stakeholder Applications
text, January 2019


A protocol for an intercomparison of biodiversity and ecosystem services models using harmonized land-use and climate scenarios
journal, January 2018

  • Kim, HyeJin; Rosa, Isabel M. D.; Alkemade, Rob
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-11-4537-2018

Does CMIP6 Inspire More Confidence in Simulating Climate Extremes over China?
journal, July 2020


Impacts of Urban Expansion on Terrestrial Carbon Storage in China
journal, May 2019

  • Liu, Xiaoping; Wang, Shaojian; Wu, Peijun
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 53, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00103

Global projections of future urban land expansion under shared socioeconomic pathways
journal, January 2020


Effect of border policy on exposure and vulnerability to climate change
journal, October 2020

  • Benveniste, Hélène; Oppenheimer, Michael; Fleurbaey, Marc
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 117, Issue 43
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2007597117

Quantifying the impact of current and future concentrations of air pollutants on respiratory disease risk in England
journal, March 2017


The Arctic surface climate in CMIP6: status and developments since CMIP5
preprint, January 2019


Evaluating permafrost physics in the CMIP6 models and their sensitivity to climate change
journal, February 2020

  • Burke, Eleanor; Zhang, Yu; Krinner, Gerhard
  • The Cryosphere Discussions
  • DOI: 10.5194/tc-2019-309