DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Uncertainty quantification for optical model parameters

Journal Article · · Physical Review C
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [3]
  1. Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States). National Superconducting Cyclotron Lab. Dept. of Physics and Astronomy; Michigan State University
  2. Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States). National Superconducting Cyclotron Lab. Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
  3. Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States). Mathematics and Computer Science Division

Although uncertainty quantification has been making its way into nuclear theory, these methods have yet to be explored in the context of reaction theory. For example, it is well known that different parameterizations of the optical potential can result in different cross sections, but these differences have not been systematically studied and quantified. The purpose of our work is to investigate the uncertainties in nuclear reactions that result from fitting a given model to elastic-scattering data, as well as to study how these uncertainties propagate to the inelastic and transfer channels. We use statistical methods to determine a best fit and create corresponding 95% confidence bands. A simple model of the process is fit to elastic-scattering data and used to predict either inelastic or transfer cross sections. In this initial work, we assume that our model is correct, and the only uncertainties come from the variation of the fit parameters. Here, we study a number of reactions involving neutron and deuteron projectiles with energies in the range of 5–25 MeV/u, on targets with mass A=12–208. We investigate the correlations between the parameters in the fit. The case of deuterons on 12C is discussed in detail: the elastic-scattering fit and the prediction of 12C(d,p)13C transfer angular distributions, using both uncorrelated and correlated χ2 minimization functions. The general features for all cases are compiled in a systematic manner to identify trends. This work shows that, in many cases, the correlated χ2 functions (in comparison to the uncorrelated χ2 functions) provide a more natural parameterization of the process. These correlated functions do, however, produce broader confidence bands. Further optimization may require improvement in the models themselves and/or more information included in the fit.

Research Organization:
Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States); Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Office of Defense Programs (DP) (NA-10); USDOE Office of Science (SC), Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) (SC-21); National Science Foundation (NSF) (United States)
Grant/Contract Number:
NA0002135; FG52-08NA28552; AC02-06CH11357
OSTI ID:
1357088
Journal Information:
Physical Review C, Journal Name: Physical Review C Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 95; ISSN 2469-9985
Publisher:
American Physical Society (APS)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (36)

Local phenomenological nucleon-nucleon potentials journal December 1968
The calculation of neutron cross-sections from optical potentials journal June 1964
Scattering and pick-up reactions with deuterons on Be, B, C, N and O at 11.8 MeV journal September 1967
Vector analysing power and cross section for 90Zr(, p)91Zr at 11 and 12 MeV journal May 1973
Elastic scattering of 9–13 MeV vector polarized deuterons journal November 1974
Neutron scattering from 208Pb journal February 1978
Erratum to “Bayesian methods for parameter estimation in effective field theories” [Ann. Phys. 324 (2009) 682–708] journal September 2009
Bayesian Monte Carlo Method for Nuclear Data Evaluation journal January 2015
Nuclear Reactions for Astrophysics: Principles, Calculation and Applications of Low-Energy Reactions book January 2009
Statistics of Measuring Neutron star Radii: Assessing a Frequentist and a Bayesian Approach journal September 2015
Neutron scattering from 12 C between 15.6 and 17.3 MeV journal June 1993
Systematic uncertainties in direct reaction theories journal February 2015
Error analysis in nuclear density functional theory journal February 2015
Bayesian parameter estimation for effective field theories journal May 2016
Study of the ( d ,   p ) Reaction in the 1 p Shell journal December 1967
Nucleon-Nucleus Optical-Model Parameters, A > 40 , E < 50 MeV journal June 1969
Excitation of low-lying collective states in Ca 40 and Pb 208 by inelastic neutron scattering journal October 1977
Energy dependence of the deformed optical potential for neutron scattering from 54 , 56 Fe and 58 , 60 Ni up to 80 MeV journal November 1988
Collective doorway configurations in Ca 49 through neutron scattering on Ca 48 journal June 1990
Are coupled channel effects important for the asymptotic normalization coefficient method? journal November 2001
Coupling and higher-order effects in the C 12 ( d , p ) C 13 and C 13 ( p , d ) C 12 reactions journal July 2005
Deuteron global optical model potential for energies up to 200 MeV journal October 2006
Three-body description of direct nuclear reactions: Comparison with the continuum discretized coupled channels method journal December 2007
Improved description of Ar 34 , 36 , 46 ( p , d ) transfer reactions journal March 2011
Adiabatic approximation versus exact Faddeev method for ( d , p ) and ( p , d ) reactions journal September 2011
Comparing nonperturbative models of the breakup of neutron-halo nuclei journal April 2012
Analysis of a low-energy correction to the eikonal approximation journal September 2014
Quantifying truncation errors in effective field theory journal August 2015
Effective field theory for nuclear vibrations with quantified uncertainties journal December 2015
Applying Bayesian parameter estimation to relativistic heavy-ion collisions: Simultaneous characterization of the initial state and quark-gluon plasma medium journal August 2016
Role of core excitation in ( d , p ) transfer reactions journal October 2016
Uncertainty Quantification for Nuclear Density Functional Theory and Information Content of New Measurements journal March 2015
Uncertainty Analysis and Order-by-Order Optimization of Chiral Nuclear Interactions journal February 2016
Uncertainty quantification and propagation in nuclear density functional theory journal December 2015
Uncertainty quantification of effective nuclear interactions journal May 2016
Calculation and Evaluation of Cross Sections and Kerma Factors for Neutrons up to 100 MeV on Carbon journal May 1996

Cited By (1)

Exploring experimental conditions to reduce uncertainties in the optical potential journal December 2019

Similar Records

Uncertainty quantification due to optical potentials in models for ( d,p ) reactions
Journal Article · Fri Oct 26 04:00:00 UTC 2018 · Physical Review C · OSTI ID:1525887

Constraining transfer cross sections using Bayes' theorem
Journal Article · Thu Jun 21 04:00:00 UTC 2018 · Physical Review C · OSTI ID:1463318

INTERACTION OF 26 Mev DEUTERONS WITH C$sup 1$$sup 2$
Journal Article · Tue Oct 01 04:00:00 UTC 1963 · Nuclear Physics (Netherlands) Divided into Nucl. Phys. A and Nucl. Phys. B · OSTI ID:4108263