DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Geoengineering with stratospheric aerosols: What do we not know after a decade of research?

Abstract

Any well-informed future decision on whether and how to deploy solar geoengineering requires balancing the impacts (both intended and unintended) of intervening in the climate against the impacts of not doing so. In spite of the tremendous progress in the last decade, the current state of knowledge remains insufficient to support an assessment of this balance, even for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering (SAG), arguably the best understood (practical) geoengineering method. We then articulate key unknowns associated with SAG, including both climate-science and design questions, as an essential step toward developing a future strategic research program that could address outstanding uncertainties.

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [2]
  1. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY (United States)
  2. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  3. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL) (Retired), Livermore, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1347870
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1338254
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-118070
Journal ID: ISSN 2328-4277
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-76RL01830; AC0576RL01830
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Earth's Future
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 4; Journal Issue: 11; Journal ID: ISSN 2328-4277
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; 58 GEOSCIENCES; geoengineering; uncertainty

Citation Formats

MacMartin, Douglas G., Kravitz, Ben, Long, Jane C. S., and Rasch, Philip J. Geoengineering with stratospheric aerosols: What do we not know after a decade of research?. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1002/2016EF000418.
MacMartin, Douglas G., Kravitz, Ben, Long, Jane C. S., & Rasch, Philip J. Geoengineering with stratospheric aerosols: What do we not know after a decade of research?. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000418
MacMartin, Douglas G., Kravitz, Ben, Long, Jane C. S., and Rasch, Philip J. Tue . "Geoengineering with stratospheric aerosols: What do we not know after a decade of research?". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000418. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1347870.
@article{osti_1347870,
title = {Geoengineering with stratospheric aerosols: What do we not know after a decade of research?},
author = {MacMartin, Douglas G. and Kravitz, Ben and Long, Jane C. S. and Rasch, Philip J.},
abstractNote = {Any well-informed future decision on whether and how to deploy solar geoengineering requires balancing the impacts (both intended and unintended) of intervening in the climate against the impacts of not doing so. In spite of the tremendous progress in the last decade, the current state of knowledge remains insufficient to support an assessment of this balance, even for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering (SAG), arguably the best understood (practical) geoengineering method. We then articulate key unknowns associated with SAG, including both climate-science and design questions, as an essential step toward developing a future strategic research program that could address outstanding uncertainties.},
doi = {10.1002/2016EF000418},
journal = {Earth's Future},
number = 11,
volume = 4,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Oct 25 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Tue Oct 25 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 26 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The Response of Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide to the Eruption of Mt. Pinatubo at Southern and Northern Midlatitudes
journal, March 2013

  • Aquila, V.; Oman, L. D.; Stolarski, R.
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 70, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/jas-d-12-0143.1

Geoengineering as an optimization problem
journal, July 2010


The Science of Geoengineering
journal, May 2013


Microphysical and radiative changes in cirrus clouds by geoengineering the stratosphere: GEOENGINEERING EFFECT ON CIRRUS CLOUDS
journal, May 2013

  • Cirisan, A.; Spichtinger, P.; Luo, B. P.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50388

Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) simulations of climate following volcanic eruptions: VOLCANIC IMPACTS IN THE CMIP5 MODELS
journal, September 2012

  • Driscoll, Simon; Bozzo, Alessio; Gray, Lesley J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D17
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012JD017607

Stratospheric controlled perturbation experiment: a small-scale experiment to improve understanding of the risks of solar geoengineering
journal, December 2014

  • Dykema, John A.; Keith, David W.; Anderson, James G.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 372, Issue 2031
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0059

Stratospheric dynamics and midlatitude jets under geoengineering with space mirrors and sulfate and titania aerosols
journal, January 2015

  • Ferraro, A. J.; Charlton-Perez, A. J.; Highwood, E. J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 120, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014JD022734

Climate impacts of ice nucleation: ICE NUCLEATION
journal, October 2012

  • Gettelman, A.; Liu, X.; Barahona, D.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D20
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012JD017950

An overview of the Earth system science of solar geoengineering: Overview of the earth system science of solar geoengineering
journal, July 2016

  • Irvine, Peter J.; Kravitz, Ben; Lawrence, Mark G.
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 7, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/wcc.423

Modeling of solar radiation management: a comparison of simulations using reduced solar constant and stratospheric sulphate aerosols
journal, July 2014

  • Kalidindi, Sirisha; Bala, Govindasamy; Modak, Angshuman
  • Climate Dynamics, Vol. 44, Issue 9-10
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00382-014-2240-3

A temporary, moderate and responsive scenario for solar geoengineering
journal, February 2015

  • Keith, David W.; MacMartin, Douglas G.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 5, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2493

Sulfuric acid deposition from stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate aerosols
journal, January 2009

  • Kravitz, Ben; Robock, Alan; Oman, Luke
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 114, Issue D14
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009JD011918

The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
journal, January 2011

  • Kravitz, Ben; Robock, Alan; Boucher, Olivier
  • Atmospheric Science Letters, Vol. 12, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/asl.316

A multi-model assessment of regional climate disparities caused by solar geoengineering
journal, July 2014


Explicit feedback and the management of uncertainty in meeting climate objectives with solar geoengineering
journal, April 2014


Geoengineering as a design problem
journal, January 2016

  • Kravitz, Ben; MacMartin, Douglas G.; Wang, Hailong
  • Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/esd-7-469-2016

Effects of stratospheric sulfate aerosol geo-engineering on cirrus clouds: EFFECTS OF GEO-ENGINEERING ON CIRRUS
journal, December 2012

  • Kuebbeler, Miriam; Lohmann, Ulrike; Feichter, Johann
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012GL053797

Control of global warming?
journal, September 1990


Management of trade-offs in geoengineering through optimal choice of non-uniform radiative forcing
journal, October 2012

  • MacMartin, Douglas G.; Keith, David W.; Kravitz, Ben
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 3, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1722

Can we test geoengineering?
journal, January 2011

  • MacMynowski, Douglas G.; Keith, David W.; Caldeira, Ken
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 4, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1039/c1ee01256h

Key impacts of climate engineering on biodiversity and ecosystems, with priorities for future research
journal, March 2016


Inability of stratospheric sulfate aerosol injections to preserve the West Antarctic Ice Sheet: STRATOSPHERIC AEROSOLS AND WAIS
journal, June 2015

  • McCusker, K. E.; Battisti, D. S.; Bitz, C. M.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GL064314

Impact of changes in diffuse radiation on the global land carbon sink
journal, April 2009

  • Mercado, Lina M.; Bellouin, Nicolas; Sitch, Stephen
  • Nature, Vol. 458, Issue 7241
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature07949

Modification of cirrus clouds to reduce global warming
journal, October 2009


A consistent prescription of stratospheric aerosol for both radiation and chemistry in the Community Earth System Model (CESM1)
journal, January 2016

  • Neely III, Ryan Reynolds; Conley, Andrew J.; Vitt, Francis
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-2459-2016

Solar irradiance reduction via climate engineering: Impact of different techniques on the energy balance and the hydrological cycle: CLIMATIC IMPACT OF DIFFERENT SRM METHODS
journal, November 2013

  • Niemeier, U.; Schmidt, H.; Alterskjaer, K.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020445

Efficient formation of stratospheric aerosol for climate engineering by emission of condensible vapor from aircraft: AEROSOL FROM CONDENSIBLE VAPOR
journal, September 2010

  • Pierce, Jeffrey R.; Weisenstein, Debra K.; Heckendorn, Patricia
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 37, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010GL043975

Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): GeoMIP ozone response
journal, March 2014

  • Pitari, Giovanni; Aquila, Valentina; Kravitz, Ben
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020566

Stratospheric Aerosols from Major Volcanic Eruptions: A Composition-Climate Model Study of the Aerosol Cloud Dispersal and e-folding Time
journal, May 2016

  • Pitari, Giovanni; Di Genova, Glauco; Mancini, Eva
  • Atmosphere, Vol. 7, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.3390/atmos7060075

Crop yields in a geoengineered climate
journal, January 2012

  • Pongratz, J.; Lobell, D. B.; Cao, L.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 2, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1373

Stratospheric aerosol particles and solar-radiation management
journal, August 2012

  • Pope, F. D.; Braesicke, P.; Grainger, R. G.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 2, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1528

Studying geoengineering with natural and anthropogenic analogs
journal, May 2013


Keep it complex
journal, December 2010


Impact of very short-lived halogens on stratospheric ozone abundance and UV radiation in a geo-engineered atmosphere
journal, January 2012

  • Tilmes, S.; Kinnison, D. E.; Garcia, R. R.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 12, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-10945-2012

A new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment designed for climate and chemistry models
journal, January 2015

  • Tilmes, S.; Mills, M. J.; Niemeier, U.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-8-43-2015

Climate impacts of geoengineering in a delayed mitigation scenario: GEOENGINEERING AND DELAYED MITIGATION
journal, August 2016

  • Tilmes, S.; Sanderson, B. M.; O'Neill, B. C.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016GL070122

The Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI–MIP): Project framework
journal, December 2013

  • Warszawski, Lila; Frieler, Katja; Huber, Veronika
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1312330110

Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere
journal, January 2015

  • Weisenstein, D. K.; Keith, D. W.; Dykema, J. A.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 15, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-11835-2015

Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rate
journal, January 2016


Works referencing / citing this record:

Holistic Assessment of SO 2 Injections Using CESM1(WACCM): Introduction to the Special Issue
journal, January 2019

  • Kravitz, Ben; MacMartin, Douglas G.; Tilmes, Simone
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 124, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018jd029293

Impact of Solar Radiation Modification on Allowable CO 2 Emissions: What Can We Learn From Multimodel Simulations?
journal, June 2019

  • Plazzotta, Maxime; Séférian, Roland; Douville, Hervé
  • Earth's Future, Vol. 7, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019ef001165

Climate Response to Pulse Versus Sustained Stratospheric Aerosol Forcing
journal, August 2019

  • Duan, Lei; Cao, Long; Bala, Govindasamy
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 46, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019gl083701

Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals
journal, September 2018


Estimating global agricultural effects of geoengineering using volcanic eruptions
journal, August 2018


Ozone–climate interactions and effects on solar ultraviolet radiation
journal, January 2019

  • Bais, A. F.; Bernhard, G.; McKenzie, R. L.
  • Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, Vol. 18, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1039/c8pp90059k

Mission-driven research for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
journal, January 2019

  • MacMartin, Douglas G.; Kravitz, Ben
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 116, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1811022116

Technical characteristics of a solar geoengineering deployment and implications for governance
journal, September 2019


Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target
journal, April 2018

  • MacMartin, Douglas G.; Ricke, Katharine L.; Keith, David W.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 376, Issue 2119
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0454

Upper tropospheric ice sensitivity to sulfate geoengineering
journal, January 2018

  • Visioni, Daniele; Pitari, Giovanni; di Genova, Glauco
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-14867-2018

Sensitivity of the radiative forcing by stratospheric sulfur geoengineering to the amount and strategy of the SO 2 injection studied with the LMDZ-S3A model
journal, January 2018

  • Kleinschmitt, Christoph; Boucher, Olivier; Platt, Ulrich
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-2769-2018

Sulfur deposition changes under sulfate geoengineering conditions: quasi-biennial oscillation effects on the transport and lifetime of stratospheric aerosols
journal, January 2018

  • Visioni, Daniele; Pitari, Giovanni; Tuccella, Paolo
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-2787-2018

Stratospheric aerosol evolution after Pinatubo simulated with a coupled size-resolved aerosol–chemistry–climate model, SOCOL-AERv1.0
journal, January 2018

  • Sukhodolov, Timofei; Sheng, Jian-Xiong; Feinberg, Aryeh
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-11-2633-2018

Estimating Global Agricultural Effects Of Geoengineering Using Volcanic Eruptions
text, January 2018


Estimating Global Agricultural Effects Of Geoengineering Using Volcanic Eruptions
text, January 2018