DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: An error reduction algorithm to improve lidar turbulence estimates for wind energy

Abstract

Remote-sensing devices such as lidars are currently being investigated as alternatives to cup anemometers on meteorological towers for the measurement of wind speed and direction. Although lidars can measure mean wind speeds at heights spanning an entire turbine rotor disk and can be easily moved from one location to another, they measure different values of turbulence than an instrument on a tower. Current methods for improving lidar turbulence estimates include the use of analytical turbulence models and expensive scanning lidars. While these methods provide accurate results in a research setting, they cannot be easily applied to smaller, vertically profiling lidars in locations where high-resolution sonic anemometer data are not available. Thus, there is clearly a need for a turbulence error reduction model that is simpler and more easily applicable to lidars that are used in the wind energy industry. In this work, a new turbulence error reduction algorithm for lidars is described. The Lidar Turbulence Error Reduction Algorithm, L-TERRA, can be applied using only data from a stand-alone vertically profiling lidar and requires minimal training with meteorological tower data. The basis of L-TERRA is a series of physics-based corrections that are applied to the lidar data to mitigate errors frommore » instrument noise, volume averaging, and variance contamination. These corrections are applied in conjunction with a trained machine-learning model to improve turbulence estimates from a vertically profiling WINDCUBE v2 lidar. The lessons learned from creating the L-TERRA model for a WINDCUBE v2 lidar can also be applied to other lidar devices. L-TERRA was tested on data from two sites in the Southern Plains region of the United States. The physics-based corrections in L-TERRA brought regression line slopes much closer to 1 at both sites and significantly reduced the sensitivity of lidar turbulence errors to atmospheric stability. The accuracy of machine-learning methods in L-TERRA was highly dependent on the input variables and training dataset used, suggesting that machine learning may not be the best technique for reducing lidar turbulence intensity (TI) error. Future work will include the use of a lidar simulator to better understand how different factors affect lidar turbulence error and to determine how these errors can be reduced using information from a stand-alone lidar.« less

Authors:
; ORCiD logo
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
OSTI Identifier:
1343361
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1324227
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5000-66374
Journal ID: ISSN 2366-7451
Grant/Contract Number:  
LDRD Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308; AC36-08GO28308
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Wind Energy Science (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Wind Energy Science (Online) Journal Volume: 2 Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 2366-7451
Publisher:
European Wind Energy Association - Copernicus
Country of Publication:
Germany
Language:
English
Subject:
17 WIND ENERGY; lidar; turbulence; power prediction; machine learning

Citation Formats

Newman, Jennifer F., and Clifton, Andrew. An error reduction algorithm to improve lidar turbulence estimates for wind energy. Germany: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.5194/wes-2-77-2017.
Newman, Jennifer F., & Clifton, Andrew. An error reduction algorithm to improve lidar turbulence estimates for wind energy. Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-77-2017
Newman, Jennifer F., and Clifton, Andrew. Fri . "An error reduction algorithm to improve lidar turbulence estimates for wind energy". Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-77-2017.
@article{osti_1343361,
title = {An error reduction algorithm to improve lidar turbulence estimates for wind energy},
author = {Newman, Jennifer F. and Clifton, Andrew},
abstractNote = {Remote-sensing devices such as lidars are currently being investigated as alternatives to cup anemometers on meteorological towers for the measurement of wind speed and direction. Although lidars can measure mean wind speeds at heights spanning an entire turbine rotor disk and can be easily moved from one location to another, they measure different values of turbulence than an instrument on a tower. Current methods for improving lidar turbulence estimates include the use of analytical turbulence models and expensive scanning lidars. While these methods provide accurate results in a research setting, they cannot be easily applied to smaller, vertically profiling lidars in locations where high-resolution sonic anemometer data are not available. Thus, there is clearly a need for a turbulence error reduction model that is simpler and more easily applicable to lidars that are used in the wind energy industry. In this work, a new turbulence error reduction algorithm for lidars is described. The Lidar Turbulence Error Reduction Algorithm, L-TERRA, can be applied using only data from a stand-alone vertically profiling lidar and requires minimal training with meteorological tower data. The basis of L-TERRA is a series of physics-based corrections that are applied to the lidar data to mitigate errors from instrument noise, volume averaging, and variance contamination. These corrections are applied in conjunction with a trained machine-learning model to improve turbulence estimates from a vertically profiling WINDCUBE v2 lidar. The lessons learned from creating the L-TERRA model for a WINDCUBE v2 lidar can also be applied to other lidar devices. L-TERRA was tested on data from two sites in the Southern Plains region of the United States. The physics-based corrections in L-TERRA brought regression line slopes much closer to 1 at both sites and significantly reduced the sensitivity of lidar turbulence errors to atmospheric stability. The accuracy of machine-learning methods in L-TERRA was highly dependent on the input variables and training dataset used, suggesting that machine learning may not be the best technique for reducing lidar turbulence intensity (TI) error. Future work will include the use of a lidar simulator to better understand how different factors affect lidar turbulence error and to determine how these errors can be reduced using information from a stand-alone lidar.},
doi = {10.5194/wes-2-77-2017},
journal = {Wind Energy Science (Online)},
number = 1,
volume = 2,
place = {Germany},
year = {Fri Feb 10 00:00:00 EST 2017},
month = {Fri Feb 10 00:00:00 EST 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2-77-2017

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and Cross-Validation
journal, February 1983


Remote sensing of atmospheric wind velocities using solid-state and CO/sub 2/ coherent laser systems
journal, February 1996

  • Huffaker, R. M.; Hardesty, R. M.
  • Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 84, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1109/5.482228

The influence of the wind speed profile on wind turbine performance measurements
journal, May 2009

  • Wagner, Rozenn; Antoniou, Ioannis; Pedersen, Søren M.
  • Wind Energy, Vol. 12, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/we.297

Wind turbulence estimates in a valley by coherent Doppler lidar: Turbulence Estimates from Doppler Lidar
journal, August 2011

  • Krishnamurthy, Raghavendra; Calhoun, Ronald; Billings, Brian
  • Meteorological Applications, Vol. 18, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/met.263

The Effects of Probe-Induced Flow Distortion on Atmospheric Turbulence Measurements
journal, July 1981


Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines
journal, March 1991


The spatial structure of neutral atmospheric surface-layer turbulence
journal, August 1994


Can Wind Lidars Measure Turbulence?
journal, July 2011

  • Sathe, A.; Mann, J.; Gottschall, J.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 28, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-10-05004.1

Wind power meteorology. Part I: climate and turbulence
journal, January 1999


Influence of atmospheric stability on wind turbine loads: Atmospheric stability and loads
journal, July 2012

  • Sathe, A.; Mann, J.; Barlas, T.
  • Wind Energy, Vol. 16, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/we.1528

Using machine learning to predict wind turbine power output
journal, April 2013


Multi-site testing and evaluation of remote sensing instruments for wind energy applications
journal, May 2013


Signal-to-Noise Relationships for Coaxial Systems that Heterodyne Backscatter from the Atmosphere
journal, January 1971


The modification of wind turbine performance by statistically distinct atmospheric regimes
journal, September 2012


Coherent Doppler lidar for wind farm characterization: Coherent Doppler lidar for wind farm characterization
journal, January 2012

  • Krishnamurthy, R.; Choukulkar, A.; Calhoun, R.
  • Wind Energy, Vol. 16, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/we.539

A Time Series Sodar Simulator Based on Large-Eddy Simulation
journal, April 2014

  • Wainwright, Charlotte E.; Stepanian, Phillip M.; Chilson, Phillip B.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 31, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00161.1

The Impacts of Atmospheric Stability on the Accuracy of Wind Speed Extrapolation Methods
journal, January 2014


Lidar Simulations to Study Measurements of Turbulence in Different Atmospheric Conditions
book, January 2014


Wind Measurements from Arc Scans with Doppler Wind Lidar
journal, November 2015

  • Wang, H.; Barthelmie, R. J.; Clifton, A.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 32, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00059.1

A review of turbulence measurements using ground-based wind lidars
journal, January 2013


Lidar Scanning of Momentum Flux in and above the Atmospheric Surface Layer
journal, June 2010

  • Mann, J.; Peña, A.; Bingöl, F.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 27, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/2010JTECHA1389.1

Principles of Lasers and Optics
book, January 2005


3D Turbulence Measurements Using Three Synchronous Wind Lidars: Validation against Sonic Anemometry
journal, July 2014

  • Fuertes, Fernando Carbajo; Iungo, Giacomo Valerio; Porté-Agel, Fernando
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 31, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00206.1

Turbulence, a challenging problem for wind energy
journal, July 2004

  • Peinke, Joachim; Barth, Stephan; Böttcher, Frank
  • Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 338, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2004.02.040

Offshore wind profiling using light detection and ranging measurements
journal, March 2009

  • Peña, Alfredo; Hasager, Charlotte Bay; Gryning, Sven-Erik
  • Wind Energy, Vol. 12, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/we.283

Variability of Surface Air Temperature over Gently Sloped Terrain
journal, June 2009

  • Bodine, David; Klein, Petra M.; Arms, Sean C.
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 48, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/2009JAMC1933.1

Virtual Towers Using Coherent Doppler Lidar during the Joint Urban 2003 Dispersion Experiment
journal, August 2006

  • Calhoun, R.; Heap, R.; Princevac, M.
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 45, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAM2391.1

Scopes and Challenges of Dual-Doppler Lidar Wind Measurements—An Error Analysis
journal, September 2013

  • Stawiarski, Christina; Träumner, Katja; Knigge, Christoph
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 30, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00244.1

Vertical velocity variance and skewness in clear and cloud-topped boundary layers as revealed by Doppler lidar
journal, April 2009

  • Hogan, Robin J.; Grant, Alan L. M.; Illingworth, Anthony J.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 135, Issue 640
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.413

3D Wind and Turbulence Characteristics of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer
journal, May 2014

  • Barthelmie, R. J.; Crippa, P.; Wang, H.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 95, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00111.1

The Arm Climate Research Facility: A Review of Structure and Capabilities
journal, March 2013

  • Mather, James H.; Voyles, Jimmy W.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 94, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00218.1

Time series analysis of continuous-wave coherent Doppler Lidar wind measurements
journal, May 2008


Assessing atmospheric stability and its impacts on rotor-disk wind characteristics at an onshore wind farm
journal, July 2011

  • Wharton, Sonia; Lundquist, Julie K.
  • Wind Energy, Vol. 15, Issue 4, p. 525-546
  • DOI: 10.1002/we.483

Introduction
book, January 2001


Measuring turbine inflow with vertically-profiling lidar in complex terrain
journal, July 2015

  • Wharton, S.; Newman, J. F.; Qualley, G.
  • Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 142
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2015.03.023

Accounting for the effect of turbulence on wind turbine power curves
journal, June 2014


Turbine-scale wind field measurements using dual-Doppler lidar: Turbine-scale wind field measurements using dual-Doppler lidar
journal, December 2013

  • Newsom, Rob K.; Berg, Larry K.; Shaw, William J.
  • Wind Energy, Vol. 18, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/we.1691

Wind Energy Handbook
book, September 2001


A six-beam method to measure turbulence statistics using ground-based wind lidars
journal, January 2015

  • Sathe, A.; Mann, J.; Vasiljevic, N.
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 8, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/amt-8-729-2015

Lidar
book, January 2005


Speed and Direction Shear in the Stable Nocturnal Boundary Layer
journal, January 2009

  • Walter, Kevin; Weiss, Christopher C.; Swift, Andrew H. P.
  • Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Vol. 131, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1115/1.3035818

Quantifying error of lidar and sodar Doppler beam swinging measurements of wind turbine wakes using computational fluid dynamics
journal, January 2015

  • Lundquist, J. K.; Churchfield, M. J.; Lee, S.
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 8, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/amt-8-907-2015

Evaluation of three lidar scanning strategies for turbulence measurements
journal, January 2016

  • Newman, Jennifer F.; Klein, Petra M.; Wharton, Sonia
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 9, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/amt-9-1993-2016

Retrieving wind statistics from average spectrum of continuous-wave lidar
journal, January 2013

  • Branlard, E.; Pedersen, A. T.; Mann, J.
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 6, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.5194/amt-6-1673-2013

Wind power curve modeling in complex terrain using statistical models
journal, January 2015

  • Bulaevskaya, V.; Wharton, S.; Clifton, A.
  • Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, Vol. 7, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4904430