DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Applications of aggregation theory to sustainability assessment

Abstract

In order to aid in transition towards operations that promote sustainability goals, researchers and stakeholders use sustainability assessments. Although assessments take various forms, many utilize diverse sets of indicators that can number anywhere from two to over 2000. Indices, composite indicators, or aggregate values are used to simplify high dimensional and complex data sets and to clarify assessment results. Although the choice of aggregation function is a key component in the development of the assessment, there are few examples to be found in literature to guide appropriate aggregation function selection. This paper develops a connection between the mathematical study of aggregation functions and sustainability assessment in order to aid in providing criteria for aggregation function selection. Relevant mathematical properties of aggregation functions are presented and interpreted. Lastly, we provide cases of these properties and their relation to previous sustainability assessment research. Examples show that mathematical aggregation properties can be used to address the topics of compensatory behavior and weak versus strong sustainability, aggregation of data under varying units of measurements, multiple site multiple indicator aggregation, and the determination of error bounds in aggregate output for normalized and non-normalized indicator measures.

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [2]
  1. Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN (United States). Dept. of Mathematics; Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Center for BioEnergy Sustainability
  2. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Center for BioEnergy Sustainability
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
OSTI Identifier:
1286768
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1249864
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Ecological Economics
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 114; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0921-8009
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY; aggregation functions; compensatory functions; distance to target; indicators; mathematical aggregation theory; sustainability assessment; uncertainty; weak versus strong sustainability

Citation Formats

Pollesch, N., and Dale, V. H. Applications of aggregation theory to sustainability assessment. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.011.
Pollesch, N., & Dale, V. H. Applications of aggregation theory to sustainability assessment. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.011
Pollesch, N., and Dale, V. H. Wed . "Applications of aggregation theory to sustainability assessment". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.011. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1286768.
@article{osti_1286768,
title = {Applications of aggregation theory to sustainability assessment},
author = {Pollesch, N. and Dale, V. H.},
abstractNote = {In order to aid in transition towards operations that promote sustainability goals, researchers and stakeholders use sustainability assessments. Although assessments take various forms, many utilize diverse sets of indicators that can number anywhere from two to over 2000. Indices, composite indicators, or aggregate values are used to simplify high dimensional and complex data sets and to clarify assessment results. Although the choice of aggregation function is a key component in the development of the assessment, there are few examples to be found in literature to guide appropriate aggregation function selection. This paper develops a connection between the mathematical study of aggregation functions and sustainability assessment in order to aid in providing criteria for aggregation function selection. Relevant mathematical properties of aggregation functions are presented and interpreted. Lastly, we provide cases of these properties and their relation to previous sustainability assessment research. Examples show that mathematical aggregation properties can be used to address the topics of compensatory behavior and weak versus strong sustainability, aggregation of data under varying units of measurements, multiple site multiple indicator aggregation, and the determination of error bounds in aggregate output for normalized and non-normalized indicator measures.},
doi = {10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.011},
journal = {Ecological Economics},
number = C,
volume = 114,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Apr 01 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Wed Apr 01 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 52 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

On the possible merging functions
journal, June 1989


On scientific laws without dimensional constants
journal, October 1986

  • Aczél, János; Roberts, Fred S.; Rosenbaum, Zangwill
  • Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 119, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1016/0022-247X(86)90162-9

Measuring the immeasurable — A survey of sustainability indices
journal, June 2007


In search of a natural systems sustainability index
journal, July 2004


A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators
journal, March 2011


Meaningful environmental indices: a social choice approach
journal, March 2004


Environmental Indicators of Biofuel Sustainability: What About Context?
journal, July 2012

  • Efroymson, Rebecca A.; Dale, Virginia H.; Kline, Keith L.
  • Environmental Management, Vol. 51, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9907-5

Empirical evaluation of agricultural sustainability using composite indicators
journal, March 2010


A framework for clarifying the meaning of Triple Bottom-Line, Integrated, and Sustainability Assessment
journal, February 2008


A human well-being approach for assessing the value of natural land areas
journal, September 2013


Aggregation (in-)variance of shared responsibility: A case study of Australia
journal, October 2007


On the possible psychophysical laws.
journal, January 1959


Linking NAMEA and Input output for ‘consumption vs. production perspective’ analyses
journal, February 2012


Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems
journal, February 2008


Indicators to support environmental sustainability of bioenergy systems
journal, September 2011


How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets
journal, June 2012


Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI)
journal, January 2012


The Economics of Sustainable Development
journal, November 1994


An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies
journal, March 2009


On the Theory of Scales of Measurement
journal, June 1946


Input–output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: The effects of spatial aggregation
journal, November 2010


The biodiversity conservation game with heterogeneous countries
journal, May 2013


Works referencing / citing this record:

Participation and retention in a green tourism certification scheme
journal, February 2016


Assessing sustainability in agricultural landscapes: a review of approaches 1,2
journal, September 2018

  • Eichler Inwood, Sarah E.; López-Ridaura, Santiago; Kline, Keith L.
  • Environmental Reviews, Vol. 26, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1139/er-2017-0058

Composite Indicators for Sustainability Assessment: Methodological Developments
book, April 2018


Sensitivity to weighting in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA)
journal, December 2019

  • Prado, Valentina; Cinelli, Marco; Ter Haar, Sterre F.
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-019-01718-3

Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability
journal, June 2019


Weak and Strong Compensation for the Prioritization of Public Investments: Multidimensional Analysis for Pools
journal, December 2015

  • De Mare, Gianluigi; Granata, Maria; Nesticò, Antonio
  • Sustainability, Vol. 7, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.3390/su71215798