DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: New bounding and decomposition approaches for MILP investment problems: Multi-area transmission and generation planning under policy constraints

Abstract

A novel two-phase bounding and decomposition approach to compute optimal and near-optimal solutions to large-scale mixed-integer investment planning problems is proposed and it considers a large number of operating subproblems, each of which is a convex optimization. Our motivating application is the planning of power transmission and generation in which policy constraints are designed to incentivize high amounts of intermittent generation in electric power systems. The bounding phase exploits Jensen’s inequality to define a lower bound, which we extend to stochastic programs that use expected-value constraints to enforce policy objectives. The decomposition phase, in which the bounds are tightened, improves upon the standard Benders’ algorithm by accelerating the convergence of the bounds. The lower bound is tightened by using a Jensen’s inequality-based approach to introduce an auxiliary lower bound into the Benders master problem. Upper bounds for both phases are computed using a sub-sampling approach executed on a parallel computer system. Numerical results show that only the bounding phase is necessary if loose optimality gaps are acceptable. But, the decomposition phase is required to attain optimality gaps. Moreover, use of both phases performs better, in terms of convergence speed, than attempting to solve the problem using just the bounding phasemore » or regular Benders decomposition separately.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. Adolfo Ibanez Univ., Santiago (Chile)
  2. Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD (United States)
  3. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1146247
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1359033
Report Number(s):
SAND-2014-4398J
Journal ID: ISSN 0377-2217; PII: S0377221715007110
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC04-94AL85000; KJ0401000
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
European Journal of Operational Research
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 248; Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 0377-2217
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING; OR in energy; stochastic programming; benders decomposition

Citation Formats

Munoz, F. D., Hobbs, B. F., and Watson, J. -P. New bounding and decomposition approaches for MILP investment problems: Multi-area transmission and generation planning under policy constraints. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.057.
Munoz, F. D., Hobbs, B. F., & Watson, J. -P. New bounding and decomposition approaches for MILP investment problems: Multi-area transmission and generation planning under policy constraints. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.057
Munoz, F. D., Hobbs, B. F., and Watson, J. -P. Mon . "New bounding and decomposition approaches for MILP investment problems: Multi-area transmission and generation planning under policy constraints". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.057. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1146247.
@article{osti_1146247,
title = {New bounding and decomposition approaches for MILP investment problems: Multi-area transmission and generation planning under policy constraints},
author = {Munoz, F. D. and Hobbs, B. F. and Watson, J. -P.},
abstractNote = {A novel two-phase bounding and decomposition approach to compute optimal and near-optimal solutions to large-scale mixed-integer investment planning problems is proposed and it considers a large number of operating subproblems, each of which is a convex optimization. Our motivating application is the planning of power transmission and generation in which policy constraints are designed to incentivize high amounts of intermittent generation in electric power systems. The bounding phase exploits Jensen’s inequality to define a lower bound, which we extend to stochastic programs that use expected-value constraints to enforce policy objectives. The decomposition phase, in which the bounds are tightened, improves upon the standard Benders’ algorithm by accelerating the convergence of the bounds. The lower bound is tightened by using a Jensen’s inequality-based approach to introduce an auxiliary lower bound into the Benders master problem. Upper bounds for both phases are computed using a sub-sampling approach executed on a parallel computer system. Numerical results show that only the bounding phase is necessary if loose optimality gaps are acceptable. But, the decomposition phase is required to attain optimality gaps. Moreover, use of both phases performs better, in terms of convergence speed, than attempting to solve the problem using just the bounding phase or regular Benders decomposition separately.},
doi = {10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.057},
journal = {European Journal of Operational Research},
number = 3,
volume = 248,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2016},
month = {Mon Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2016}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 50 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

A benders decomposition based heuristic for the hierarchical production planning problem
journal, March 1990


Models for Determining Least-Cost Investments in Electricity Supply
journal, April 1972

  • Anderson, Dennis
  • The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 3, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2307/3003078

Transmission expansion planning with AC model based on generalized Benders decomposition
journal, May 2013

  • Asadamongkol, Somphop; Eua-arporn, Bundhit
  • International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 47
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.11.008

Correlated wind-power production and electric load scenarios for investment decisions
journal, January 2013


Wind Power Investment: A Benders Decomposition Approach
journal, February 2012


Adaptive Robust Optimization for the Security Constrained Unit Commitment Problem
journal, February 2013

  • Bertsimas, Dimitris; Litvinov, Eugene; Sun, Xu Andy
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 28, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2205021

A new Benders decomposition approach to solve power transmission network design problems
journal, May 2001

  • Binato, S.; Pereira, M. V. F.; Granville, S.
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 16, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1109/59.918292

A multicut algorithm for two-stage stochastic linear programs
journal, March 1988


Solving an Electricity Generating Capacity Expansion Planning Problem by Generalized Benders' Decomposition
journal, February 1983


Long-Range Generation Planning Using Generalized Benders' Decomposition: Implementation and Experience
journal, April 1984

  • Bloom, Jeremy A.; Caramanis, Michael; Charny, Leonid
  • Operations Research, Vol. 32, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1287/opre.32.2.290

Power System Simulation Model Based on Probability Analysis
journal, January 1972


The Introduction of NonDIispatchable Technologies a Decision Variables in Long-Term Generation Expansion Models
journal, August 1982

  • Caramanis, Michael; Tabors, Richard; Nochur, Kumar
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-101, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1109/TPAS.1982.317636

Large-scale mixed integer programming: Benders-type heuristics
journal, June 1984


The National Energy Modeling System: A Large-Scale Energy-Economic Equilibrium Model
journal, February 2001


Generalized Benders decomposition
journal, October 1972

  • Geoffrion, A. M.
  • Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 10, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00934810

Management Science Update Column—“Multicommodity Distribution System Design by Benders Decomposition”
journal, August 1980


Transmission Planning Under Uncertainties of Wind and Load: Sequential Approximation Approach
journal, August 2013


Comprehensive review of generation and transmission expansion planning
journal, September 2013

  • Hemmati, Reza; Hooshmand, Rahmat-Allah; Khodabakhshian, Amin
  • IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, Vol. 7, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0031

Stochastic Decomposition: An Algorithm for Two-Stage Linear Programs with Recourse
journal, August 1991

  • Higle, Julia L.; Sen, Suvrajeet
  • Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 16, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1287/moor.16.3.650

Optimization methods for electric utility resource planning
journal, May 1995


Stochastic Programming-Based Bounding of Expected Production Costs for Multiarea Electric Power System
journal, December 1999


On using approximations of the Benders master problem
journal, August 1994


Bounds on the Expectation of a Convex Function of a Random Variable: With Applications to Stochastic Programming
journal, April 1977

  • Huang, C. C.; Ziemba, W. T.; Ben-Tal, A.
  • Operations Research, Vol. 25, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1287/opre.25.2.315

Optimal SO/sub 2/ compliance planning using probabilistic production costing and generalized benders decomposition
journal, January 1994

  • Huang, W.; Hobbs, B. F.
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 9, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1109/59.317545

Monte Carlo (importance) sampling within a benders decomposition algorithm for stochastic linear programs
journal, December 1992


Sur les fonctions convexes et les inégalités entre les valeurs moyennes
journal, January 1906


Merchant Transmission Investment*
journal, June 2005


Comparing the Costs of Intermittent and Dispatchable Electricity Generating Technologies
journal, May 2011


Regulation by Simulation: The Role of Production Cost Models in Electricity Planning and Pricing
journal, June 1995


Strategic Generation Investment Under Uncertainty Via Benders Decomposition
journal, February 2012


Classification of publications and models on transmission expansion planning
journal, May 2003

  • Latorre, G.; Cruz, R. D.; Areiza, J. M.
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 18, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.811168

A Sequential Procedure for Determining the Length of a Steady-State Simulation
journal, October 1979


Inequalities for Stochastic Linear Programming Problems
journal, January 1960


Accelerating Benders Decomposition: Algorithmic Enhancement and Model Selection Criteria
journal, June 1981


Effectiveness of antithetic sampling and stratified sampling in Monte Carlo chronological production cost modeling (power systems)
journal, May 1991

  • Marnay, C.; Strauss, T.
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 6, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1109/59.76711

A Modified Benders' Partitioning Algorithm for Mixed Integer Programming
journal, November 1977


Transmission Network Investment With Probabilistic Security and Corrective Control
journal, November 2013

  • Moreno, Rodrigo; Pudjianto, Danny; Strbac, Goran
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 28, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2257885

An Engineering-Economic Approach to Transmission Planning Under Market and Regulatory Uncertainties: WECC Case Study
journal, January 2014

  • Munoz, Francisco D.; Hobbs, Benjamin F.; Ho, Jonathan L.
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 29, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2279654

Approximations in power transmission planning: implications for the cost and performance of renewable portfolio standards
journal, January 2013

  • Munoz, Francisco D.; Sauma, Enzo E.; Hobbs, Benjamin F.
  • Journal of Regulatory Economics, Vol. 43, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11149-013-9209-8

Transmission Expansion Planning of Systems With Increasing Wind Power Integration
journal, May 2013

  • Orfanos, George A.; Georgilakis, Pavlos S.; Hatziargyriou, Nikos D.
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 28, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2214242

Multiarea Stochastic Unit Commitment for High Wind Penetration in a Transmission Constrained Network
journal, June 2013


A Decomposition Approach To Automated Generation/Transmission Expansion Planning
journal, November 1985

  • F. Pereira, M.; V. G. Pinto, L.; F. Cunha, S.
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-104, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1109/TPAS.1985.318815

A combined deterministic and sampling-based sequential bounding method for stochastic programming
conference, December 2011

  • Pierre-Louis, Peguy; Bayraksan, Guzin; Morton, David P.
  • 2011 Winter Simulation Conference - (WSC 2011), Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)
  • DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2011.6148105

If you build it, he will come: Anticipative power transmission planning
journal, March 2013


A Three-Level Static MILP Model for Generation and Transmission Expansion Planning
journal, February 2013

  • Pozo, David; Sauma, Enzo E.; Contreras, Javier
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 28, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2204073

Optimization of conditional value-at-risk
journal, January 2000

  • Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell; Uryasev, Stanislav
  • The Journal of Risk, Vol. 2, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.21314/JOR.2000.038

Cross decomposition for mixed integer programming
journal, January 1983


Convergence properties of generalized benders decomposition
journal, July 1991


Batch Size Effects in the Analysis of Simulation Output
journal, June 1982


A Two-Phase Decomposition Approach for Electric Utility Capacity Expansion Planning Including Nondispatchable Technologies
journal, October 1990

  • Sherali, Hanif D.; Staschus, Konstantin
  • Operations Research, Vol. 38, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1287/opre.38.5.773

An Integer Programming Approach and Implementation for an Electric Utility Capacity Planning Problem with Renewable Energy Sources
journal, July 1987

  • Sherali, Hanif D.; Staschus, Konstantin; Huacuz, Jorge M.
  • Management Science, Vol. 33, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.33.7.831

Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS)
report, December 2011


Accommodating Variability in Generation Planning
journal, February 2013

  • Shortt, Aonghus; Kiviluoma, Juha; O'Malley, Mark
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 28, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2202925

Convergence Properties of the Batch Means Method for Simulation Output Analysis
journal, November 2001


Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic
journal, May 2001

  • Tibshirani, Robert; Walther, Guenther; Hastie, Trevor
  • Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), Vol. 63, Issue 2, p. 411-423
  • DOI: 10.1111/1467-9868.00293

A New Approach to Model Load Levels in Electric Power Systems With High Renewable Penetration
journal, September 2014

  • Wogrin, Sonja; Duenas, Pablo; Delgadillo, Andres
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 29, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2300697

Works referencing / citing this record:

Meeting the Modeling Needs of Future Energy Systems
journal, May 2017

  • Keles, Dogan; Jochem, Patrick; McKenna, Russell
  • Energy Technology, Vol. 5, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/ente.201600607

Do unit commitment constraints affect generation expansion planning? A scalable stochastic model
journal, January 2019


Meeting the Modeling Needs of Future Energy Systems
text, January 2017