skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Control Banding Nanotool: Evaluation of a qualitative risk assessment method for the control of nanoparticulate exposures

Conference ·

Control Banding strategies offer a simplified control of worker exposures when there is an absence of firm toxicological and exposure information. The nanotechnology industry fits this classification as there are overwhelming uncertainties of work-related health risks posed by nanomaterials. Many experts have suggested Control Banding as a solution for these issues. A recent survey shows a majority of nanomaterial users are not performing a basic risk assessment of their product in use. A Control Banding Nanotool has been developed and implemented to afford a qualitative risk assessment toward the control of nanoparticle exposures. The international use of the Control Banding Nanotool reflects on both its need and its possibilities. By developing this dynamic Control Banding Nanotool within the realm of the scientific information available, this application of Control Banding appears to be a useful approach for assessing the risk of nanomaterial operations. This success can be seen in providing recommendations for appropriate engineering controls, facilitating the allocation of resources to the activities that most need them, and initiating an appropriate discussion of these risks with nonexperts. Experts have requested standardization of toxicological parameters, affording better utility and consistency of research. This database of toxicological research findings should be harnessed and presented in a format feeding directly into the Control Banding Nanotool severity and probability risk matrix. Making the latest research available for experts and practitioners alike will provide the best protection of workers in the nanotechnology industries. This presentation will also show the science behind the simplified Control Banding Nanotool approach, its structure, weighting of risks, utility for exposure mitigation, and the research needs to bolster its effectiveness.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
DOE Contract Number:
W-7405-ENG-48
OSTI ID:
951164
Report Number(s):
LLNL-CONF-410191; TRN: US200911%%358
Resource Relation:
Journal Volume: 11; Journal Issue: 7; Conference: Presented at: International Congress on Occupational Health, Cape Town, South Africa, Mar 22 - Mar 27, 2009
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (25)

Editorial journal August 1998
Carbon Nanotubes: A Review of Their Properties in Relation to Pulmonary Toxicology and Workplace Safety journal February 2006
Potential risks of nanomaterials and how to safely handle materials of uncertain toxicity journal January 2009
Risk Assessment of Engineered Nanomaterials: A Survey of Industrial Approaches journal January 2008
Research Strategies for Safety Evaluation of Nanomaterials, Part II: Toxicological and Safety Evaluation of Nanomaterials, Current Challenges and Data Needs journal August 2005
Design of measurement strategies for workplace exposures journal May 2002
Long-term trends in occupational exposure: Are they real? What causes them? What shall we do with them? journal August 2000
Assessing the airborne titanium dioxide nanoparticle-related exposure hazard at workplace journal February 2009
Occupational Hygiene Considerations in the Development of a Structured Approach to Select Chemical Control Strategies journal August 1998
Considerations on occupational medical surveillance in employees handling nanoparticles journal September 2007
Performance-Based Exposure Control Limits for Pharmaceutical Active Ingredients journal January 1996
Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study journal May 2008
Research Strategies for Safety Evaluation of Nanomaterials. Part VI. Characterization of Nanoscale Particles for Toxicological Evaluation journal January 2006
Relative Risk Analysis of Several Manufactured Nanomaterials:  An Insurance Industry Context journal November 2005
An Introduction to a UK Scheme to Help Small Firms Control Health Risks from Chemicals journal August 1998
Penetration of Intact Skin by Quantum Dots with Diverse Physicochemical Properties journal January 2006
Occupational Risk Management of Engineered Nanoparticles journal April 2008
Nanotechnology Safety Concerns Revisited journal June 2007
Research Strategies for Safety Evaluation of Nanomaterials, Part VIII: International Efforts to Develop Risk-Based Safety Evaluations for Nanomaterials journal May 2006
Research Strategies for Safety Evaluation of Nanomaterials, Part IV: Risk Assessment of Nanoparticles journal September 2005
Testing Strategies to Establish the Safety of Nanomaterials: Conclusions of an ECETOC Workshop journal January 2007
Pulmonary toxicity study in rats with three forms of ultrafine-TiO2 particles: Differential responses related to surface properties journal January 2007
Health effects related to nanoparticle exposures: Environmental, health and safety considerations for assessing hazards and risks journal October 2008
Inhaled nanoparticles—A current review journal May 2008
Grassroots ergonomics: initiating an ergonomics program utilizing participatory techniques journal May 2001

Similar Records

Control Banding and Nanotechnology Synergist
Journal Article · Tue Dec 15 00:00:00 EST 2009 · The Synergist, vol. 21, no. 3, March 1, 2010, pp. 26-29 · OSTI ID:951164

Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures
Journal Article · Mon Mar 03 00:00:00 EST 2008 · The Annals of Occupational Hygiene, vol. 52, no. 6, July 16, 2008, pp. 419-428 · OSTI ID:951164

A Quantitative Validation of the Control Banding Nanotool
Journal Article · Wed Aug 21 00:00:00 EDT 2019 · Annals of Work Exposures and Health · OSTI ID:951164