Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

A Quantitative Validation of the Control Banding Nanotool

Journal Article · · Annals of Work Exposures and Health
 [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA

Abstract

Eleven years (by publication) years after the development and application of the control banding (CB) Nanotool for the qualitative assessment and control of engineered nanoparticles (ENP), there remains no quantitative gold standard to serve as an alternative to the qualitative assessment. Many CB models have been developed during the years subsequent to the initial development of the CB Nanotool and the literature continues to blossom with comparisons and applications of these various tools; however, these developments have hitherto been made in the absence of validating and verifying their effectiveness using existing, albeit limited, quantitative methods. This paper reviews the existing literature on the CB Nanotool to evaluate its effectiveness in a variety of settings and presents a summary of qualitative and quantitative information from its application in a broad range of ENP handling activities performed in two different research institutions. A total of 28 ENP activities were assessed using the CB Nanotool (Version 2.0). Due to the lack of guidance on a single exposure assessment methodology, a combination of real-time monitoring, filter analysis, and microscopic analysis was used to assess various quantitative metrics, including mass concentration, particle number concentration, and particle speciation. All the results indicated that the control outcomes from the CB Nanotool qualitative assessment were sufficient to prevent workers from being exposed to ENP at levels beyond established exposure limits or background levels. These data represent an independent quantitative validation of CB Nanotool risk level outcomes and give further credence to the use of the CB Nanotool to effectively control worker exposures in the absence of quantitative air monitoring results.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
AC52-07NA27344
OSTI ID:
1564453
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1841328
Journal Information:
Annals of Work Exposures and Health, Journal Name: Annals of Work Exposures and Health; ISSN 2398-7308
Publisher:
Oxford University PressCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
Country unknown/Code not available
Language:
English

References (26)

Occupational handling of nickel nanoparticles: A case report: Nickel Nanoparticle Toxicology journal May 2014
Silicon dioxide nanoparticles increase macrophage atherogenicity: Stimulation of cellular cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, and triglycerides accumulation: SiO journal November 2014
Airborne Nanostructured Particles and Occupational Health journal December 2005
Evaluating the Control Banding Nanotool: a qualitative risk assessment method for controlling nanoparticle exposures journal June 2009
Occupational exposure limits for nanomaterials: state of the art journal July 2010
Grassroots ergonomics: initiating an ergonomics program utilizing participatory techniques journal June 2001
Occupational hygiene considerations in the development of a structured approach to select chemical control strategies journal August 1998
Inhaled nanoparticles—A current review journal May 2008
Control banding tools for occupational exposure assessment of nanomaterials — Ready for use in a regulatory context? journal April 2016
Assessing the airborne titanium dioxide nanoparticle-related exposure hazard at workplace journal February 2009
Health effects related to nanoparticle exposures: Environmental, health and safety considerations for assessing hazards and risks journal October 2008
Nanotechnologies, engineered nanomaterials and occupational health and safety – A review journal October 2010
Workshop report: Strategies for setting occupational exposure limits for engineered nanomaterials journal April 2014
Testing Strategies to Establish the Safety of Nanomaterials: Conclusions of an ECETOC Workshop journal January 2007
Occupational Risk Management of Engineered Nanoparticles journal April 2008
History and Evolution of Control Banding: A Review journal April 2008
A Systematic Review of Reported Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials journal July 2016
Control Banding Tools for Engineered Nanoparticles: What the Practitioner Needs to Know journal February 2018
Acute Lung Injury: A Yellow Card for Engineered Nanoparticles? journal August 2009
Research Strategies for Safety Evaluation of Nanomaterials, Part VIII: International Efforts to Develop Risk-Based Safety Evaluations for Nanomaterials journal May 2006
Pulmonary applications and toxicity of engineered nanoparticles journal September 2008
Development of a Control Banding Tool for Nanomaterials journal January 2012
Exposure to nanoparticles is related to pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma journal August 2009
Risk Level Based Management System: A Control Banding Model for Occupational Health and Safety Risk Management in a Highly Regulated Environment journal January 2010
Environmental Risk Communication through Qualitative Risk Assessment journal June 2014
Review of Qualitative Approaches for the Construction Industry: Designing a Risk Management Toolbox journal June 2011

Similar Records

Control Banding Nanotool: Evaluation of a qualitative risk assessment method for the control of nanoparticulate exposures
Conference · Mon Jan 26 23:00:00 EST 2009 · OSTI ID:951164

Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures
Journal Article · Sun Mar 02 23:00:00 EST 2008 · The Annals of Occupational Hygiene, vol. 52, no. 6, July 16, 2008, pp. 419-428 · OSTI ID:945159

Related Subjects