skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Core cleaning for restoration of native wettability

Journal Article · · SPE (Society of Petroleum Engineers) Format. Eval.; (United States)
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2118/14875-PA· OSTI ID:6983439

Certain additives used in drilling and completion fluids may alter the wettability of core. For example, the surfactants in invert-oil-emulsion drilling muds are known to alter the wettability of core. Because routine cleaning methods do not remove these surfactants, core that is to be used for special laboratory analyses, such as relative permeability, capillary pressure, and saturation exponent, is left with an altered wettability. Experiments with such core will obviously produce erroneous data. To obtain reliable results, cleaning methods must be developed to remove these surfactants, allowing restoration of plugs to their natural wettability. Once the core is cleaned, the wettability of the cleaned core can be restored by saturating with synthetic formation brine and uncontaminated reservoir crude, then aging at the reservoir temperature. This report ranks the efficiency of solvents in removing surfactants from plugs contaminated with invert-oil-emulsion drilling-mud filtrate. Eight solvents for Berea sandstone and seven solvents for Guelph dolomite have been ranked after Dean-Stark extraction of mud surfactants using the U.S. Bureau of Mines (USBM) wettability index. The best solvent for both rock types was a 50/50 mixture of toluene/methanol, or the equivalent, containing 1% ammonium hydroxide. Toluene, the most commonly used solvent for core cleaning, was one of the poorest solvents tested. The solvents that are effective in removing surfactants can be used to clean contaminated core.

Research Organization:
Conoco Inc. (US)
OSTI ID:
6983439
Journal Information:
SPE (Society of Petroleum Engineers) Format. Eval.; (United States), Vol. 3:1
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English