Environmental adders and emissions trading: Oil and water

Journal Article · Tue Sep 01 04:00:00 EDT 1992 · Electricity Journal; (United States)

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/1040-6190(92)90182-7· OSTI ID:6962385

Hobbs, B F ^[1]

---

1. Case Western Reserve Univ., Cleveland, OH (United States)

This article presents the case that in practice it may be better for commissions not to attempt to set adders by calculating damages due to SO[sub 2] released in its jurisdiction, and guessing where the emissions might otherwise have taken place, and what damages would then have occurred. In the best case, the adoption by states of incorrect and inconsistent adders would simply lead to a redistribution of emissions, yielding higher compliance costs but little or no environmental benefit. The worst case would occur if such adders were widely applied not just to resource acquisition decisions, but also generation dispatch. This could render allowances worthless and thus destroy the allowance system that Congress created. Such an outcome would contradict the will of Congress, which desired to see an effective market mechanism established for SO[sub 2] control. Further, that outcome would also make it less likely that Congress would choose to adopt allowance systems to address other pollution problems - which would make achievement of environmental goals more difficult and costly.

• OSTI ID: 6962385
• Journal Information: Electricity Journal; (United States), Journal Name: Electricity Journal; (United States) Vol. 5:7; ISSN ELEJE4; ISSN 1040-6190
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS
200600* -- Fossil-Fueled Power Plants-- Economic
Industrial
& Business Aspects-- (1990-)
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY
290300 -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Environment
Health
& Safety
296000 -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Electric Power
CONTROL
COST
ECONOMIC IMPACT
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS
MANAGEMENT
PERFORMANCE
PLANNING
POLLUTION CONTROL
POWER PLANTS
PUBLIC UTILITIES
RATE STRUCTURE
SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS
TECHNOLOGY IMPACTS