Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Weighing environmental externalities: How to do it right

Journal Article · · Electricity Journal; (United States)
 [1]; ; ;  [2]
  1. Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME (United States)
  2. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC (United States)
In this paper, the authors focus on the procedure of incorporating monetary measures of external damages as address to private bids and ranking alternatives on the basis of their social costs. They assume that it will be possible to develop methods and models to calculate environmental damages for specific electricity supply options. They reject the use of marginal control cost as a proxy for marginal damages. The question they address here is whether the marginal damage from an increase in electricity supply is the correct adjustment or adder to private cost for least-cost utility planning. They show that arriving at the correct adder depends on both the form that the existing environmental regulations take - that is, whether pollution is controlled by taxation, tradable emissions permits, or direct regulation - and, in the case of an emissions tax, whether the degree of control of pollution is optimal, too strict, or not strict enough according to the criterion of economic efficiency. They make explicit the circumstances under which the correct adder will be equal to marginal damages, will be some other positive number, or zero, or even negative. If emissions reductions are achieved by direct regulation or command and control policies (CAC), then the correct adder is always just equal to marginal damages.
OSTI ID:
6909445
Journal Information:
Electricity Journal; (United States), Journal Name: Electricity Journal; (United States) Vol. 5:7; ISSN ELEJE4; ISSN 1040-6190
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English