Air pollution cleaning wastes: dry versus wet
Journal Article
·
· J. Energy Eng.; (United States)
Wastes from dry air pollution control (APC) systems may not be less problematic to transport and landfill than wastes from wet APC Units, particularly the thixotropic flue gas desulfurization (FGD) sludge. FGD sludge can be converted to a soil-like, disposable material by forced oxidation, fly ash blending, or lime fixation. Dry APC wastes require dust-suppression. Dry APC wastes contain 15-23.7 weight percent of Ca(OH)/sub 2/ and CaCO/sub 3/ as compared to 3.6 mole % of CaCO/sub 3/ for wet material. Higher reagent stoichiometries have been reported for dry APC (1.3-1.5), as compared to wet systems (1.05); thus contributing greater dry waste generation rates. For a 1% sulfur, 10% ash, 10,000 Btu/lb coal, 0.14 ton of dry waste is generated per ton of coal. Oxidized FGD sludge yields 0.036 ton waste/ton coal while blended and fixated wastes contribute 0.113 and 0.12 ton of waste per ton of coal, respectively. Dry APC waste exhibited compacted density of 40 lb/CF; wet wastes reflect densities ranging from 80-90 lb/CF; (oxidized), 75-90 lb/CF (blended), and 95-105 lb/CF (fixated). Higher waste rates and lower compacted densities require more area for dry APC waste disposal than for wet.
- Research Organization:
- General Electric Environmental Services, New York, NY
- OSTI ID:
- 6856708
- Journal Information:
- J. Energy Eng.; (United States), Journal Name: J. Energy Eng.; (United States) Vol. 109:3; ISSN JLEED
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Air pollution cleaning wastes: dry versus wet air pollution control systems
Air pollution cleaning wastes: dry versus wet
Options for treating and disposing of FGD scrubber sludge
Journal Article
·
Thu Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 1983
· J. Sol. Energy Eng.; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:5574519
Air pollution cleaning wastes: dry versus wet
Journal Article
·
Thu Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 1983
· Energy Eng.; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:6843485
Options for treating and disposing of FGD scrubber sludge
Journal Article
·
Sat Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1977
· Combustion
·
OSTI ID:6843879
Related Subjects
20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS
200202* -- Fossil-Fueled Power Plants-- Waste Management-- Noxious Gas & Particulate Emissions
AEROSOL WASTES
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
ASHES
CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS
CHALCOGENIDES
CHEMICAL REACTIONS
COAL
CONTROL
DESULFURIZATION
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS
ENERGY SOURCES
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
EQUIPMENT
FLUE GAS
FLY ASH
FOSSIL FUELS
FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS
FUELS
GASEOUS WASTES
INDUSTRIAL WASTES
MANAGEMENT
MATERIALS
OXIDES
OXYGEN COMPOUNDS
POLLUTION CONTROL
POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT
POWER PLANTS
RESIDUES
SLUDGES
SULFUR COMPOUNDS
SULFUR DIOXIDE
SULFUR OXIDES
THERMAL POWER PLANTS
WASTE DISPOSAL
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WASTES
200202* -- Fossil-Fueled Power Plants-- Waste Management-- Noxious Gas & Particulate Emissions
AEROSOL WASTES
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
ASHES
CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS
CHALCOGENIDES
CHEMICAL REACTIONS
COAL
CONTROL
DESULFURIZATION
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS
ENERGY SOURCES
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
EQUIPMENT
FLUE GAS
FLY ASH
FOSSIL FUELS
FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS
FUELS
GASEOUS WASTES
INDUSTRIAL WASTES
MANAGEMENT
MATERIALS
OXIDES
OXYGEN COMPOUNDS
POLLUTION CONTROL
POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT
POWER PLANTS
RESIDUES
SLUDGES
SULFUR COMPOUNDS
SULFUR DIOXIDE
SULFUR OXIDES
THERMAL POWER PLANTS
WASTE DISPOSAL
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WASTES