Commerce clause limitations on state regulation and taxation of the energy industry

Technical Report · Thu Jul 01 04:00:00 EDT 1982

OSTI ID:6729810

Tanzman, E A

As the federal government reduces its control over the energy industry, states that wish to increase their energy regulations and taxes will find a more favorable constitutional climate than in the recent past. Commerce clause restrictions that once automatically invalidated state laws that regulated or taxed energy in interstate commerce have been loosened. The once moribund doctrine of concurrent federal and state authority over interstate commerce announced in Cooley vs. Board of Wardens has been resurrected in a modern form. With these changes has come a reaffirmation of the basic purpose of the commerce clause to prohibit discrimination by a state in favor of its citizens or against those of other states. The outcomes of New England Power Co. vs. New Hampshire and Maryland vs. Louisiana emphasize that the Court will not tolerate direct geographical favoritism in either regulatory or tax laws, even under today's easier commerce clause restrictions. The Court has rarely lost sight of the basic uniting force of the commerce clause.

• Research Organization: Argonne National Lab., IL (USA)
• DOE Contract Number: W-31109-ENG-38
• OSTI ID: 6729810
• Report Number(s): ANL/EES-TM-192; ON: DE83000939
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY
290200 -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Economics & Sociology
293000* -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Policy
Legislation
& Regulation
ALASKA
DATA
DATA COMPILATION
ECONOMICS
ENERGY POLICY
FEDERAL REGION III
FEDERAL REGION IV
FEDERAL REGION VI
FEDERAL REGION VIII
FEDERAL REGION X
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
INDUSTRY
INFORMATION
INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS
KENTUCKY
LEGAL ASPECTS
LOUISIANA
MONTANA
NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
NEW MEXICO
NORTH AMERICA
NUMERICAL DATA
OKLAHOMA
REGULATIONS
STATE GOVERNMENT
TAXES
TEXAS
TRADE
USA
WEST VIRGINIA
WYOMING