A systematic method for protecting industrial production from sabotage
The U.S. DOE initiated the Production Risk Evaluation Program (PREP) at Sandia National Laboratoires (SNL) to assess quantitatively the potential for serious production disruption as the result of random failures, accidents, natural disasters, or sabotage at its facilities. SNL developed a procedure incorporating both network and fault tree models that identifies production vulnerabilities. For each production step, a steady-state flow model computes the ''critical time,'' which is the maximum period a step can be shut down without preventing the system from achieving production goals. The critical time is then used in fault tree analysis to determine the failure modes that can stop the process for longer than this period. Modular logic modeling is used for constructing the fault trees. Equipment restorable within it s critical time need not be considered critical even though it may perform significant work. The PREP models can be used to identify those plant areas to which a saboteur would need to gain access. A security strategy using graded protection could potentially save money. PREP methods also provide quantitative insights to develop protection measures that do not infringe upon the liberties of personnel or complicate work practices.
- Research Organization:
- Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (US); ERCI Inc., Albuquerque,, NM (US)
- OSTI ID:
- 6379843
- Report Number(s):
- CONF-880631-
- Journal Information:
- Nucl. Mater. Manage. Annu. Meet. Proc.; (United States), Journal Name: Nucl. Mater. Manage. Annu. Meet. Proc.; (United States) Vol. 17; ISSN NUMMB
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Vulnerability analysis of manufacturing systems: A systematic method for protecting industrial production from disruption
Use of fault and decision tree analyses to protect against industrial sabotage
Related Subjects
Inspection
& Accountability
98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION
ACCIDENTS
ALARM SYSTEMS
COMPUTER CALCULATIONS
EQUIPMENT
FAULT TREE ANALYSIS
FLOW MODELS
INDUSTRY
INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS
MATHEMATICAL MODELS
NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
NUCLEAR FACILITIES
NUCLEAR INDUSTRY
PERSONNEL
PHYSICAL PROTECTION
PRODUCTIVITY
RADIATION ACCIDENTS
RISK ASSESSMENT
SANDIA LABORATORIES
SECURITY
SYSTEM FAILURE ANALYSIS
SYSTEMS ANALYSIS
US AEC
US DOE
US ERDA
US ORGANIZATIONS