International jurisdictional issues in the Arctic Ocean
Awareness in the United States of the strategic value of the Arctic has been prevalent for many years. Appreciation of the Arctic's economic, political, and scientific value, as well as its juridical importance, is rapidly increasing. For several years, both the Soviet Union and Canada have had more ongoing commercial, scientific, and policy activities in the Arctic regions than the United States. Resource development, national security, and marine boundary issues promise to raise the level of awareness and importance of the Arctic regions to the United States over the next twenty years. The purpose of the article is to indicate the range and complexity of marine boundary jurisdiction issues in the Arctic. The commercial development of offshore hydrocarbons in the Arctic promises to increase political and legal pressures in several disputed marine boundary areas. Consequently, disputes over marine boundaries in the Arctic could disrupt future peaceful relations between Arctic rim nations. 55 references, 4 figures.
- Research Organization:
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst., MA
- OSTI ID:
- 6288084
- Journal Information:
- Ocean Dev. Int. Law; (United States), Journal Name: Ocean Dev. Int. Law; (United States) Vol. 14:3; ISSN ODILA
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
International and United States documents on oceans law and policy. Volume 3
Denver-Julesburg Basin: jurisdictional dispute erupts in Colo
Related Subjects
290400* -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Energy Resources
293000 -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Policy
Legislation
& Regulation
294000 -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Fossil Fuels
AGREEMENTS
ARCTIC REGIONS
COMMERCIALIZATION
ECONOMICS
HYDROCARBONS
INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
OFFSHORE OPERATIONS
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
POLAR REGIONS
POLITICAL ASPECTS
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
TREATIES