skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Will judicial error allow industrial point sources to avoid BPT snd perhaps BAT later. A story of good intentions, bad dictum, and ugly consequence

Journal Article · · Ecol. Law Q.; (United States)
OSTI ID:6051340

The 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments were aimed at reducing or eliminating water pollution discharges at point sources. All discharges were to reach compliance by way of the best practical technology (BPT) by 1977 and by the best available technology (BAT) that is economically achievable by 1983. A review of this legislation and subsequent variance regulation reveals that, while the intent was for uniformity during the pre-BAT clean-up stage, industries have avoided or delayed compliance with five-year interim permits, through Environmental Protection Agency exemptions, or by demonstrating that individual discharge factors were fundamentally different. The failure to meet the BPT deadline, often on the grounds that compliance will lead to unemployment, indicates the stricter BAT limitations are even less likely to be met. If the BAT goals for water quality are to be reached, Congress must explicitly require dischargers to comply or go out of business.

OSTI ID:
6051340
Journal Information:
Ecol. Law Q.; (United States), Vol. 7:4
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English