Nuclear strategy: the case for a theory of victory
- Hudson Inst., Croton-on Hudson, NY (United States)
Arguments over Salt II will avoid some needed discussion of basic strategies. The author questions the value of arms control negotiations and weapons systems evaluations when there is no firm strategic force posture. He points out that failure to deter attack will leave the country in an acute crisis and the president with the options of surrender or proceeding without a clear strategy. The evolution of pre-war deterrence as a policy of assured destruction is outlined and examined in terms of whether the concept is rational or likely to be effective in the long run. Arguments of the two schools of thought - military equivalency and counter-military targeting - are summarized and, while some advances are noted in recent years, there is still a need to establish stability criteria in US defense planning.
- Research Organization:
- Hudson Inst., Croton-on Hudson, NY (United States)
- OSTI ID:
- 6022500
- Journal Information:
- International Security, Vol. 4, Issue 1; ISSN 0162-2889
- Publisher:
- MIT Press
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Defending the Homeland: Growing Foreign Challenges to the U.S. Missile Defense Posture
The case for eliminating battlefield nuclear weapons
Related Subjects
POLICY AND ECONOMY
45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
NATIONAL DEFENSE
NUCLEAR WEAPONS
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
SECURITY
USA
VULNERABILITY
AGREEMENTS
NORTH AMERICA
WEAPONS
290600* - Energy Planning & Policy- Nuclear Energy
293000 - Energy Planning & Policy- Policy
Legislation
& Regulation
450202 - Explosions & Explosives- Nuclear- Weaponry- (-1989)