Politics and scientific expertise: Scientists, risk perception, and nuclear waste policy
- Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA (United States)
- Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (United States)
To study the homogeneity and influences on scientists' perspectives of environmental risks, the authors have examined similarities and differences in risk perceptions, particularly regarding nuclear wastes, and policy preferences among 1011 scientists and engineers. Significant differences (p<0.05) were found in the patterns of beliefs among scientists from different fields of research. In contrast to physicists, chemists, and engineers, life scientists tend to: (a) perceive the greatest risks from nuclear energy and nuclear waste management; (b) perceive higher levels of overall environmental risk; (c) strongly oppose imposing risks on unconsenting individuals; and (d) prefer stronger requirements for environmental management. On some issues related to priorities among public problems and calls for government action, there are significant variations among life scientists or physical scientists. It was also found that-independently of field of research-perceptions of risk and its correlates are significantly associated with the type of institution in which the scientist is employed. Scientists in universities or state and local governments tend to see the risks of nuclear energy and wastes as greater than scientists who work as business consultants, for federal organizations, or for private research laboratories. Significant differences also are found in priority given to environmental risks, the perceived proximity of environmental disaster, willingness to impose risks on an unconsenting population, and the necessity of accepting risks and sacrifices. 33 refs., 3 figs., 9 tabs.
- OSTI ID:
- 5893122
- Journal Information:
- Risk Analysis; (United States), Vol. 13:4; ISSN 0272-4332
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Risk perception in context: The Savannah River Site stakeholder study
Public perspectives of nuclear weapons in the post-cold war environment
Related Subjects
POLICY AND ECONOMY
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS
NUCLEAR ENERGY
RISK ASSESSMENT
RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT
SCIENTIFIC PERSONNEL
ATTITUDES
CONSULTANTS
ENGINEERS
POLITICAL ASPECTS
SURVEYS
ANIMALS
ENERGY
INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS
MAMMALS
MAN
MANAGEMENT
PERSONNEL
PRIMATES
PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL
VERTEBRATES
WASTE MANAGEMENT
290600* - Energy Planning & Policy- Nuclear Energy
290300 - Energy Planning & Policy- Environment
Health
& Safety
054000 - Nuclear Fuels- Health & Safety