Offshore federalism: evolving federal-state relations in offshore oil and gas development
The author examines the standards of consistency that federal activities directly affecting a state's coastal zone must meet with state coastal plans. He proposes a definition of the standard that differs from the rather loose definition proposed by the Ninth Circuit Court. Since the Supreme Court held that Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) lease sales do not directly affect the coastal zone, the proper definition of the term is unresolved. The type of offshore federalism established by a proper interpretation of the Coast Zone Management Act is even more likely to protect the public trust in coastal resources than either exclusive federal or state control of the OCS. If the states are to retain coastal management and OCS decision-making, further Congressional elaboration of the consistency provisions may be necessary.
- Research Organization:
- Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC
- OSTI ID:
- 5667632
- Journal Information:
- Ecol. Law Q.; (United States), Journal Name: Ecol. Law Q.; (United States) Vol. 11:3; ISSN ECLQA
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Secretary of the Interior v. California and the federal consistency provision of the Coastal Zone Management Act, like it or not
Coastal zone management. Hearing before the National Ocean Policy Study of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, Ninety-Eighth Congress, Second Session on S. 2324, March 28, 1984
Related Subjects
021000* -- Petroleum-- Legislation & Regulations
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY
294002 -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Petroleum
CALIFORNIA
CASE LAW
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT
CONTINENTAL MARGIN
CONTINENTAL SHELF
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
FEDERAL REGION IX
GEOLOGIC DEPOSITS
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
LAWS
LEASES
LEGAL ASPECTS
MINERAL RESOURCES
NORTH AMERICA
OFFSHORE SITES
PETROLEUM DEPOSITS
RESOURCES
STANDARDS
USA