Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Energy outlook: combining the options. [Subsidize solar and conservation to supplement conventional sources]

Journal Article · · Harvard Bus. Rev.; (United States)
OSTI ID:5575591
Stobaugh and Yergin, who edited and wrote the recent book on the energy problem, Energy Future: Report of the Energy Project at the Harvard Business School (Random House, 1979), advocate a balanced energy program. They say, in effect, that oil, coal, natural gas, and nuclear power alone will not support our current standard of living, but combining them with conservation and solar energy could do so. Admitting that conservation and solar suffer from little momentum and weak advocacy, they would clarify the handicaps under which these two labor. Since conservation and solar do not now have a fair chance to compete in the market with imported oil and other traditional sources (subsidized by price controls and unrevealed external costs), the authors would use both incentives and sanctions for equilibration purposes, with the emphasis on incentives. They point out that the true costs of imported oil are potentially at least three times its current US market price - which suggests an offsetting subsidy of two-thirds of the implementation cost for conservation and solar. However, they think somewhat lower subsidies - conservation (40 to 50%) and solar (up to 60%) would be adequate. Also, they emphasize that their concern for conservation and solar should not obscure their belief that conventional production must be further encouraged.
Research Organization:
Harvard Univ. Business School, Cambridge
OSTI ID:
5575591
Journal Information:
Harvard Bus. Rev.; (United States), Journal Name: Harvard Bus. Rev.; (United States) Vol. 58:1; ISSN HABRA
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English