Finding a [open quotes]proposal[close quotes] for major federal action consistent with the purposes of NEPA: Does Blue Ocean Preservation Society v. Watkins breathe new life into the law
Blue Ocean Preservation Society vs. Watkins (BOPS), the subject of this casenote, exemplifies the need for consideration of the environmental consequences of an agency action. The geothermal energy project which was the subject of that litigation involved sensitive, highly controversial and cultural concerns. BOPS illustrates the most compelling case for requiring preparation of an EIS before the decision to undertake agency action. This article addresses the question of what constitutes a [open quotes]proposal[close quotes] for purposes of compelling federal agencies to prepare EIS's pursuant to NEPA. Specifically, this casenote examines the method by which the Court found a proposal for major federal action in BOPS.
- OSTI ID:
- 5393318
- Journal Information:
- Natural Resources Journal; (United States), Vol. 33:1; ISSN 0028-0739
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
NEPA litigation 1988-1995: A detailed statistical analysis
Attempts to avoid NEPA: Is it bad faith?
Related Subjects
POLICY AND ECONOMY
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS
LEGAL ASPECTS
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
GEOTHERMAL ENERGY CONVERSION
HAWAII
US DOE
US NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
CONVERSION
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
DOCUMENT TYPES
ENERGY CONVERSION
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
LAWS
NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
NORTH AMERICA
US ORGANIZATIONS
USA
290300* - Energy Planning & Policy- Environment
Health
& Safety
293000 - Energy Planning & Policy- Policy
Legislation
& Regulation