Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Attempts to avoid NEPA: Is it bad faith?

Technical Report ·
OSTI ID:125992
 [1]
  1. Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., Houston, TX (United States)
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) imposes procedural requirements on federal agencies that undertake {open_quotes}major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.{close_quotes} Determining whether a project is a major federal action, subject to NEPA, is not always an easy task. When a determination is made that a project is not subject to NEPA, opponents of the project and environmental organizations occasionally cry foul. Often there are allegations that the federal agency of the project proponent (or both) acted in bad faith to avoid NEPA. The question of whether bad faith is relevant in NEPA inquiries has been the subject litigation for many of years. In that time, courts have addressed a number of bad faith questions. A common question is whether it is appropriate for a non-federal project proponent to structure a project to maintain eligibility for federal funding, but at the last minute withdraw the project from eligibility for the sole purpose of avoiding NEPA. More difficult questions arise when the federal government allocates some federal money to the project for preliminary design work before the project is withdrawn from eligibility for additional federal construction funds. Still other questions arise with respect to whether project proponents must reimburse the federal government for funds allocated to a project before the determination is made that it will not be a federal project. This paper will trace the evolution of the courts` struggle with bad faith NEPA claims. It will then show how courts have recently begun to develop a workable and appropriate test for determining when bad faith is an issue in NEPA litigation. This issue is important for project proponents and federal agency officials so they will not unwittingly take steps others might construe as bad faith. It is important for members of environmental organizations so they may recognize and properly assert bad faith claims when appropriate.
Research Organization:
National Association of Environmental Professionals, Washington, DC (United States)
OSTI ID:
125992
Report Number(s):
CONF-9506115--
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Judicial enforcement of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
Technical Report · Fri Nov 30 23:00:00 EST 1973 · OSTI ID:6037526

Nepa's impact statement in the federal courts: a case study of NRDC vs Morton
Journal Article · Sun Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1972 · Environ. Aff., v. 2, no. 4, pp. 807-826 · OSTI ID:4410778

Finding a [open quotes]proposal[close quotes] for major federal action consistent with the purposes of NEPA: Does Blue Ocean Preservation Society v. Watkins breathe new life into the law
Journal Article · · Natural Resources Journal; (United States) · OSTI ID:5393318