Clinical assessment of pacemaker power sources
The development of power sources for cardiac pacemakers has progressed from a 15-year usage of mercury-zinc batteries to widely used and accepted lithium cells. At present, there are about 6 different types of lithium cells incorporated into commercially distributed pacemakers. The authors reviewed experience over a 5-year period with 1711 mercury-zinc, 130 nuclear (P238) and 1912 lithium powered pacemakers. The lithium units have included 698 lithium-iodide, 270 lithium-silver chromate, 135 lithium-thionyl chloride, 31 lithium-lead and 353 lithium-cupric sulfide batteries. 57 of the lithium units have failed (91.2% component failure and 5.3% battery failure). 459 mercury-zinc units failed (25% component failure and 68% battery depletion). The data show that lithium powered pacemaker failures are primarily component, while mercury-zinc failures are primarily battery related. It is concluded that mercury-zinc powered pulse generators are obsolete and that lithium and nuclear (P238) power sources are highly reliable over the 5 years for which data are available. 3 refs.
- Research Organization:
- Univ of South Calif, Los Angeles, USA
- OSTI ID:
- 5343521
- Journal Information:
- Proc. - Electrochem. Soc.; (United States), Vol. 80-4
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Performance of lithium-iodine and lithium-silver chromate cells in cardiac pacemakers
The nuclear pacemaker: Is renewed interest warranted