Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Why do states build nuclear weapons? Three models in search of a bomb

Journal Article · · International Security
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2539273· OSTI ID:530652

The central purpose of this article is to challenge conventional wisdom about nuclear proliferation. The author argues that the consensus view, focusing on national security considerations as the cause of proliferation, is dangerously inadequate because nuclear weapons programs also serve other, more parochial and less obvious objectives. Nuclear weapons, like other weapons, are more than tools of national security; they are political objects of considerable importance in domestic debates and internal bureaucratic struggles and can also serve as international normative symbols of modernity and identity. The body of this article examines three alternate theoretical frameworks - called {open_quotes}models{close_quotes} in the very informal sense of the term - about why states decide to build or refrain from developing nuclear weapons: {open_quotes}the security model,{close_quotes} according to which states build nuclear weapons to increase national security against foreign threats, especially nuclear threats; {open_quotes}the domestic politics model,{close_quotes} which envisions nuclear weapons as political tools used to advance parochial domestic and bureaucratic interests; and {open_quotes}the norms model,{close_quotes} under which nuclear weapons decisions are made because weapons acquisition, or restraint in weapons development, provides an important normative symbol of a state`s modernity and identity. Although many of the ideas underlying these models exist in the vast case-study and proliferation-policy literatures, they have not been adequately analyzed, nor placed in a comparative theoretical framework, nor properly evaluated against empirical evidence. Models are compared to their theoretical conceptions of the causes of weapons development, present alternative interpretations of the history of some major proliferation decisions, and contrast the models` implications for nonproliferation policy. 71 refs.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
530652
Journal Information:
International Security, Journal Name: International Security Journal Issue: 3 Vol. 21; ISSN INTSDR; ISSN 0162-2889
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

When Sukamo sought the bomb: Indonesian nuclear aspirations in the mid-1960s
Technical Report · Sun Feb 28 23:00:00 EST 1999 · OSTI ID:6393651

Nuclear proliferation in the Third World: an analysis of decision making in Indiana and Pakistan
Thesis/Dissertation · Mon Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1984 · OSTI ID:6275795

Nuclear weapons decision-making; an application of organization theory to the mini-nuke case
Thesis/Dissertation · Mon Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1984 · OSTI ID:6073610