Strategic defense initiative and the Soviet Union
None of the important questions about the technical and operational feasibility of the strategic defense initiative (SDI) or about its effect on US security, the risk of nuclear war, and the prospect for arms control can be answered without considering the Soviet view and likely response. The main appeal of SDI is a world in which the two superpowers would have defenses that would render nuclear weapons impotent and obsolete. Defensive systems must be embedded in a strict arms-control regime that limits offensive systems. The attempt to build defenses in the current political and technological circumstances, however, will push the other side into expanding and upgrading its offensive forces. The effort to build ballistic missile defense (BMD) can, and possibly will, undermine the condition needed to ensure that BMD contributes to a safer world.
- Research Organization:
- Stanford Univ., CA
- OSTI ID:
- 5286151
- Journal Information:
- Daedalus (Boston); (United States), Journal Name: Daedalus (Boston); (United States) Vol. 2; ISSN DAEDA
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
BMD and strategic instability
The Soviet political campaign against the U. S. Strategic Defense Initiative