BMD and strategic instability
Problems with the current strategic defense initiative (SDI) program and similar Soviet ballistic missile defense (BMD) efforts include (1) an increase in US-Soviet tensions and intensification of the arms race; (2) the possibility that one of the superpowers would withdraw from the Anti-ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty and deploy some type of BMD; (3) erosion of confidence on the part of European allies, and (4) a false sense that technology and new weapons systems can eliminate the threat of nuclear destruction. The authors discount arguments that SDI will lead to crisis instability, but see virtually no chance of developing and deploying the perfect defenses necessary to meet SDI goals. While theoretically laudable, SDI is technically baseless.
- Research Organization:
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
- OSTI ID:
- 5166322
- Journal Information:
- Daedalus (Boston); (United States), Journal Name: Daedalus (Boston); (United States) Vol. 2; ISSN DAEDA
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
The Soviet political campaign against the U. S. Strategic Defense Initiative
Agenda for the strategic defense initiative