Nuclear deterrence in the Arab-Israeli conflict. A case study in Egyptian-Israeli relations
Thesis/Dissertation
·
OSTI ID:5199906
In order to achieve security and stability, and maximize the chances for resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict, should Egypt and Israel adopt declared nuclear deterrence doctrines. Or would such a move be ineffective, dangerous, or even disastrous. The nuclearization of the Middle East is not necessary: military threats to the survival of the states in the region do not justify the introduction of nuclear weapons. Nuclearization is not desirable: deterrence theory's assumptions and implications exhibit intellectual weakness and its explanatory power is unsatisfactory; nuclear deterrence may reduce the frequency of war, but it pays little attention to the consequences of war; and in comparison to defense, nuclear deterrence may lack credibility. Presently, Israel has nuclear capability and delivery systems sufficient to provide security to its vital areas through deterrence of or defense against Arab attacks. The Arabs do not, however, believe that such security extends to the Arab territories occupied by Israel during the June 1967 war. To supply security, nuclear deterrence must be effective, stable, and credible. In a multinuclear environment, the Egyptians and Israelis are likely to meet the requirement for an effective deterrence: the possession of a nuclear capability sufficient to inflict an enormous amount of death and destruction. If the Arabs and Israelis sought and adopted strategies of deterrence, they might be able to meet the requirement for a stable deterrence: the acquisition of second strike capabilities.
- Research Organization:
- Columbia Univ., New York (USA)
- OSTI ID:
- 5199906
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Nuclear capabilities of the Arabs and Israel and their implications for the Arab-Israeli conflict
Conventional deterrence: lessons from the Middle East
Middle East: U. S. policy, Israel, oil, and the Arabs
Thesis/Dissertation
·
Fri Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1982
·
OSTI ID:6691149
Conventional deterrence: lessons from the Middle East
Thesis/Dissertation
·
Tue Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1985
·
OSTI ID:5271472
Middle East: U. S. policy, Israel, oil, and the Arabs
Book
·
Sun Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1978
·
OSTI ID:5931114
Related Subjects
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY
290600* -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Nuclear Energy
45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
450202 -- Explosions & Explosives-- Nuclear-- Weaponry-- (-1989)
AFRICA
AGREEMENTS
ASIA
BILATERAL AGREEMENTS
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
EGYPTIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
ISRAEL
MIDDLE EAST
NUCLEAR DETERRENCE
SECURITY
290600* -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Nuclear Energy
45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
450202 -- Explosions & Explosives-- Nuclear-- Weaponry-- (-1989)
AFRICA
AGREEMENTS
ASIA
BILATERAL AGREEMENTS
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
EGYPTIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
ISRAEL
MIDDLE EAST
NUCLEAR DETERRENCE
SECURITY