Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Nuclear safety: Comparison of DOE's Hanford n-reactor with the Chernobyl reactor

Technical Report ·
OSTI ID:5074535
GAO found that many differences exist between the Department of Energy's N-Reactor and the reactor near Chernobyl. One of the most significant differences involves the reactors' inherent physics responses to increases in coolant temperature. Other differences are (1) N-Reactor uses a metal form of uranium fuel, while the Chernobyl reactor uses an oxide form of uranium fuel and (2) N-Reactor uses once-through emergency cooling rather than a recirculating emergency cooling system like Chernobyl's. GAO found that the overall safety of N-Reactor relies heavily on successful operation of a different type of system - a reactor confinement system. N-Reactor has been operating 3 years beyond its expected life, and many systems and components are deteriorating. Maintaining safe operations through the mid-1990s will require considerable upgrading and rehabilitation. To extend safe operation of N-Reactor beyond the year 2000, major renovations - costing as much as $1.2 billion - will be required.
Research Organization:
General Accounting Office, Washington, DC (USA)
OSTI ID:
5074535
Report Number(s):
GAO/RCED-86-213BR
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English