Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Seller of spent batteries incurs CERCLA liability under appeals court reversal

Journal Article · · Hazardous Waste Consultant
OSTI ID:450807
Reversing a lower court ruling, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has decided that an auto parts company that sold spent lead-acid batteries to a lead reclaimer can be held liable under CERCLA for contamination caused by battery remnants (Cattelus Development Corporation v. United States et al., Dockett Number: 93-16530). The lower court had ruled that the auto parts company was not liable because (1) the batteries still had a {open_quotes}productive use{close_quotes} when they were sold, and (2) the company had no involvement in the final disposition of the battery casings.
OSTI ID:
450807
Journal Information:
Hazardous Waste Consultant, Journal Name: Hazardous Waste Consultant Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 13; ISSN 0738-0232; ISSN HWCOEH
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Appeals court upholds electric arc furnace dust disposal restrictions
Journal Article · Sat Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1994 · Hazardous Waste Consultant · OSTI ID:457859

Limited transporter liability confirmed in recommendation to dismiss CERCLA claim
Journal Article · Tue Feb 28 23:00:00 EST 1995 · Hazardous Waste Consultant · OSTI ID:450808

Appeals Court: DOE must take spent fuel or pay the consequences
Journal Article · Sun Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 1996 · Radwaste Magazine · OSTI ID:471512