PHENOMENOLOGICAL DISCUSSION OF EQUILIBRIUM SHAPE OF DEFORMED NUCLEI

Journal Article · Fri Nov 01 04:00:00 EST 1963 · Nuclear Physics (Netherlands) Divided into Nucl. Phys. A and Nucl. Phys. B

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(63)90068-3· OSTI ID:4050289

Yamazaki, T

In general the predictions of the Bohr-Mottelson model can be replaced by those of the asymmetric-rotor model for the K = 2 band. Since any difference between the predictions of the two models is not inherent to the assumption on the equilibrium shape or gamma vibration, it is impossible to distinguish between these models by predicted quantities such as these. However, the two models give quite different features for higher band schemes. Experimental information about the K = 4 band seems to provide evidence for the validity of the Bohr-Mottelson model in contrast to the asymmetric-rotor model. (auth)

• Research Organization: Tokyo Univ.
• NSA Number: NSA-18-018934
• OSTI ID: 4050289
• Journal Information: Nuclear Physics (Netherlands) Divided into Nucl. Phys. A and Nucl. Phys. B, Journal Name: Nuclear Physics (Netherlands) Divided into Nucl. Phys. A and Nucl. Phys. B Vol. Vol: 49; ISSN NUPHA
• Country of Publication: Country unknown/Code not available
• Language: English

Related Subjects

BOHR-MOTTELSON MODEL
CONFIGURATION
DEFORMATION
ENERGY LEVELS
NUCLEAR MODELS
OSCILLATIONS
PHYSICS
ROTATION