The Multi-Mode Model (MMM) for turbulent transport was applied to a large set of well-analyzed discharges from the National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) in order to evaluate its sensitivities to a wide range of plasma conditions. MMM calculations were performed for hundreds of milliseconds in each discharge by performing time-dependent predictive simulations with the 1.5D tokamak integrated modeling code TRANSP. A closely related study (Lestz et al 2025 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 67 105029) concluded that MMM predicted electron and ion temperature profiles that were in reasonable agreement with NSTX observations, generally outperforming a different reduced transport model, TGLF. This finding motivates the more thorough investigation of the characteristics of the MMM predictions conducted in this work. The simulations with MMM have electron energy transport dominated by electron temperature gradient modes in the examined discharges with relatively low plasma β (ratio of kinetic plasma pressure to magnetic field pressure) and high collisionality, transitioning to a mixture of different modes for higher β and lower collisionality. The thermal ion diffusivity predicted by MMM is much smaller than the neoclassical contribution, in line with previous experimental analysis of NSTX. Nonetheless, the electron and ion temperature profiles are coupled via collisional energy exchange and thus sensitive to which transport channels are predicted. The time-dependent simulations with MMM are robust to the simulation start time, converging to remarkably similar temperature profiles later during the discharge. MMM typically overpredicts confinement relative to NSTX observations, leading to the prediction of overly steep temperature profiles. Plasmas with spatially broader temperature profiles, higher plasma β, and longer energy confinement times tend to be predicted by MMM with better agreement with the experiment. As a result, these findings provide useful context for understanding the regime-dependent tendencies of MMM in anticipation of self-consistent, time-dependent predictive simulations of NSTX-U discharges with these same modeling tools.
Lestz, J. B., et al. "Sensitivities of time-dependent temperature profile predictions for NSTX with the multi-mode model." Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 67, no. 10, Oct. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ae0c34
Lestz, J. B., Avdeeva, G., Kaye, S. M., Gorelenkova, M. V., Halpern, F. D., McClenaghan, J., Pankin, A. Y., & Thome, K. E. (2025). Sensitivities of time-dependent temperature profile predictions for NSTX with the multi-mode model. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 67(10). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ae0c34
Lestz, J. B., Avdeeva, G., Kaye, S. M., et al., "Sensitivities of time-dependent temperature profile predictions for NSTX with the multi-mode model," Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 67, no. 10 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ae0c34
@article{osti_3001946,
author = {Lestz, J. B. and Avdeeva, G. and Kaye, S. M. and Gorelenkova, M. V. and Halpern, F. D. and McClenaghan, J. and Pankin, A. Y. and Thome, K. E.},
title = {Sensitivities of time-dependent temperature profile predictions for NSTX with the multi-mode model},
annote = {The Multi-Mode Model (MMM) for turbulent transport was applied to a large set of well-analyzed discharges from the National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) in order to evaluate its sensitivities to a wide range of plasma conditions. MMM calculations were performed for hundreds of milliseconds in each discharge by performing time-dependent predictive simulations with the 1.5D tokamak integrated modeling code TRANSP. A closely related study (Lestz et al 2025 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 67 105029) concluded that MMM predicted electron and ion temperature profiles that were in reasonable agreement with NSTX observations, generally outperforming a different reduced transport model, TGLF. This finding motivates the more thorough investigation of the characteristics of the MMM predictions conducted in this work. The simulations with MMM have electron energy transport dominated by electron temperature gradient modes in the examined discharges with relatively low plasma β (ratio of kinetic plasma pressure to magnetic field pressure) and high collisionality, transitioning to a mixture of different modes for higher β and lower collisionality. The thermal ion diffusivity predicted by MMM is much smaller than the neoclassical contribution, in line with previous experimental analysis of NSTX. Nonetheless, the electron and ion temperature profiles are coupled via collisional energy exchange and thus sensitive to which transport channels are predicted. The time-dependent simulations with MMM are robust to the simulation start time, converging to remarkably similar temperature profiles later during the discharge. MMM typically overpredicts confinement relative to NSTX observations, leading to the prediction of overly steep temperature profiles. Plasmas with spatially broader temperature profiles, higher plasma β, and longer energy confinement times tend to be predicted by MMM with better agreement with the experiment. As a result, these findings provide useful context for understanding the regime-dependent tendencies of MMM in anticipation of self-consistent, time-dependent predictive simulations of NSTX-U discharges with these same modeling tools.},
doi = {10.1088/1361-6587/ae0c34},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/3001946},
journal = {Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion},
issn = {ISSN 1361-6587},
number = {10},
volume = {67},
place = {United States},
publisher = {IOP Publishing},
year = {2025},
month = {10}}
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 377, Issue 2141https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0440
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 382, Issue 2280https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0406
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 382, Issue 2280https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0414