Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Percutaneous Bone Biopsies: Comparison between Flat-Panel Cone-Beam CT and CT-Scan Guidance

Journal Article · · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
;  [1];  [2];  [1];  [3]; ;  [1];  [2];  [1]
  1. Gustave Roussy, Interventional Radiology Department (France)
  2. Gustave Roussy, Biostatistics Department (France)
  3. Gustave Roussy, Medical Physics Department (France)

PurposeThis study was designed to compare the accuracy of targeting and the radiation dose of bone biopsies performed either under fluoroscopic guidance using a cone-beam CT with real-time 3D image fusion software (FP-CBCT-guidance) or under conventional computed tomography guidance (CT-guidance).MethodsSixty-eight consecutive patients with a bone lesion were prospectively included. The bone biopsies were scheduled under FP-CBCT-guidance or under CT-guidance according to operating room availability. Thirty-four patients underwent a bone biopsy under FP-CBCT and 34 under CT-guidance. We prospectively compared the two guidance modalities for their technical success, accuracy, puncture time, and pathological success rate. Patient and physician radiation doses also were compared.ResultsAll biopsies were technically successful, with both guidance modalities. Accuracy was significantly better using FP-CBCT-guidance (3 and 5 mm respectively: p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in puncture time (32 and 31 min respectively, p = 0.51) nor in pathological results (88 and 88 % of pathological success respectively, p = 1). Patient radiation doses were significantly lower with FP-CBCT (45 vs. 136 mSv, p < 0.0001). The percentage of operators who received a dose higher than 0.001 mSv (dosimeter detection dose threshold) was lower with FP-CBCT than CT-guidance (27 vs. 59 %, p = 0.01).ConclusionsFP-CBCT-guidance for bone biopsy is accurate and reduces patient and operator radiation doses compared with CT-guidance.

OSTI ID:
22470114
Journal Information:
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Journal Name: Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 38; ISSN 0174-1551; ISSN CAIRDG
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Comparing Effective Doses During Image-Guided Core Needle Biopsies with Computed Tomography Versus C-Arm Cone Beam CT Using Adult and Pediatric Phantoms
Journal Article · Sun May 15 00:00:00 EDT 2016 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:22642545

Radiation Exposure During Transarterial Chemoembolization: Angio-CT Versus Cone-Beam CT
Journal Article · Thu Nov 14 23:00:00 EST 2019 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:22970458

Pediatric Percutaneous Osteoid Osteoma Ablation: Cone-Beam CT with Fluoroscopic Overlay Versus Conventional CT Guidance
Journal Article · Sun Oct 15 00:00:00 EDT 2017 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:22756394