Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Life-cycle costing assessment of back contact doping and encapsulation alternatives for increasing the life expectancy of CdTe PV modules (Final Report)

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/2204263· OSTI ID:2204263
 [1]
  1. Columbia Univ., New York, NY (United States); Columbia University

Contribution of Research to the State-of-Knowledge This research produced comparative sustainability evaluations of back contact doping and encapsulation alternatives considered by First Solar for decreasing degradation and increasing the life of the cadmium telluride (CdTe) photovoltaic (PV) modules. Technical Effectiveness and Economic Feasibility of Methods Investigated A holistic life-cycle-assessment of the alternatives considered for longer module operational lives, showed that they add between 0.2% and 2% to environmental impact indicators at the cradle-to-gate module level, but at the cradle-to-grave system level, alternative materials offer only benefits (i.e., environmental impact indicator decreases) to the public and the environment. Parallel experimental studies at First Solar showed that the use of the considered alternative materials did not impact the effectiveness of the current module recycling separations and material recovery processes. Furthermore, the increment on the module manufacturing cost due to using alternative materials was estimated to be negligible (i.e., >1%) and longer module lives more than compensate cost increases. Specifically, increase of the current warranted module life of 30 years to 50 years, would decrease the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) from $40/MWh to $24/MWh for utility-scale installations in the US-SW, the economic feasibility of the considered alternatives is assured. Benefit to the Public With decreasing degradation from the current ~0.3%/year of Series 6 modules to less than 0.2%/year, the public will be benefited by longer photovoltaic operational lives, and therefore. In addition, the requirement for end-of-life management is shifted from 30 years to 40 or 50 years, with profound benefits to the public and the environment.

Research Organization:
Columbia Univ., New York, NY (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Solar Energy Technologies Office
DOE Contract Number:
EE0009830
OSTI ID:
2204263
Report Number(s):
DE--EE0009830-FTR
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Life-Cycle Analysis of Potentially Longer Life Expectancy CdTe PV Modules
Journal Article · Sun Jun 11 00:00:00 EDT 2023 · Conference Record of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference · OSTI ID:2204265

Updated sustainability status of cadmium telluride thin‐film photovoltaic systems and projections
Journal Article · Sun Aug 11 00:00:00 EDT 2024 · Progress in Photovoltaics · OSTI ID:2204264

Benchmarking Anticipated Wind Project Lifetimes: Results from a Survey of U.S. Wind Industry Professionals
Technical Report · Wed Sep 18 00:00:00 EDT 2019 · OSTI ID:1564078