Experiences in long-term evaluation of mercury emission monitoring systems

Journal Article · Mon Sep 15 04:00:00 EDT 2008 · Energy and Fuels

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/ef7006744· OSTI ID:21107437

Cheng, Chin-Min; Lin, Hung-Ta; Wang, Qiang; Chen, Chien-Wei; Wang, Chia-Wei; Liu, Ming-Chung; Chen, Chi-Kuan; Pan, Wei-Ping ^[1]

---

1. Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY (United States). Institute for Combustion Science and Environmental Technology

Six mercury continuous emission monitoring (CEM) systems provided by two leading mercury (Hg) CEM system manufacturers were tested at five coal combustion utilities. The linearity, response time, day-to-day stability, efficiency of the Hg speciation modules, and ease of use were evaluated by following procedures specified in the Code of Federal Regulation Title 40 Part 75 (40 CFR Part 75). Mercury monitoring results from Hg CEM systems were compared to an EPA-recognized reference method. A sorbent trap sampling system was also evaluated in this study to compare the relative accuracy to the reference method as well as to Hg CEM systems. A conceptual protocol proposed by U.S. EPA (Method 30A) for using an Hg CEM system as the reference method for the Hg relative accuracy (RA) test was also followed to evaluate the workability of the protocol. This paper discusses the operational experience obtained from these field studies and the remaining challenges to overcome while using Hg CEM systems and the sorbent trap method for continuous Hg emission monitoring. 3 refs., 5 figs., 11 tabs.

• OSTI ID: 21107437
• Journal Information: Energy and Fuels, Journal Name: Energy and Fuels Journal Issue: 5 Vol. 22; ISSN ENFUEM; ISSN 0887-0624
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT
ACCURACY
AIR POLLUTION MONITORS
CALIBRATION
MERCURY
PERFORMANCE TESTING