Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenting in Surgically High-Risk Patients Using the Carotid Wallstent Endoprosthesis:Midterm Clinical and Ultrasound Follow-Up Results

Journal Article · · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [1]; ;  [4]
  1. Departmentof Interventional Radiology, Leuven, University Hospitals (Belgium)
  2. Department of Vascular Surgery, Leuven, University Hospitals (Belgium)
  3. Department ofNeurology, Leuven, University Hospitals (Belgium)
  4. Department ofVascular Surgery, Leuven, University Hospitals (Belgium)
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and midterm outcome of elective implantation of the Carotid Wallstent (registered) in patients considered to be at high surgical risk. In a prospective study, 54 carotid artery stenoses in 51 patients were stented over a 24-month period. Three patients underwent bilateral carotid artery stenting. Institutional inclusion criteria for invasive treatment of carotid occlusive disease (carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting) are patients presenting with a 70% or more symptomatic stenosis and those with an 80% or more asymptomatic stenosis having a life-expectancy of more than 1 year. All patients treated by carotid artery stenting were considered at high risk for carotid endarterectomy because of a hostile neck (17 patients-31.5%) or because of severe comorbidities (37 patients-68.5%). No cerebral protection device was used. Of the 54 lesions, 33 (61.1%) were symptomatic and 21 (38.8%) were asymptomatic. Follow-up was performed by physical examination and by duplex ultrasonography at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after the procedure. All 54 lesions could be stented successfully without periprocedural stroke. Advert events during follow-up (mean 13.9 {+-} 5.7 months) were non-stroke-related death in 6 patients (11.1%), minor stroke in 4 stented hemispheres(7.4%), transient ipsilateral facial pain in 1 patient (1.8%),infection of the stented surgical patch in 1 patient (1.8%) and asymptomatic in stent restenosis in 4 patients (7.4%). The percutaneous implantation of the Carotid Wallstent (registered) , even without cerebral protection device, appears to be a safe procedure with acceptable clinical and ultrasonographic follow-up results in patients at high surgical risk. But some late adverse events such as ipsilateral recurrence of non-disabling (minor) stroke or in stent restenosis still remain real challenging problems.
OSTI ID:
21088369
Journal Information:
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Journal Name: Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Journal Issue: 4 Vol. 26; ISSN 0174-1551; ISSN CAIRDG
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Carotid Stenting with Distal Protection in High-Surgical-Risk Patients: One-Year Results of the ASTI Trial
Journal Article · Wed Apr 15 00:00:00 EDT 2015 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:22470033

Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting for Radiation-Induced Stenosis
Journal Article · Sun Aug 01 00:00:00 EDT 2010 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21436110

Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis
Journal Article · Tue Dec 17 23:00:00 EST 1991 · JAMA, Journal of the American Medical Association; (United States) · OSTI ID:5484673