Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Dosimetric comparison of partial and whole breast external beam irradiation in the treatment of early stage breast cancer

Journal Article · · Medical Physics
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2799579· OSTI ID:21032871
; ; ; ; ; ;  [1]
  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212 and Drexel University College of Medicine, Allegheny Campus, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212 (United States)

A dosimetric comparison was performed on external-beam three-dimensional conformal partial breast irradiation (PBI) and whole breast irradiation (WBI) plans for patients enrolled in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-39/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0413 protocol at our institution. Twenty-four consecutive patients were treated with either PBI (12 patients) or WBI (12 patients). In the PBI arm, the lumpectomy cavity was treated to a total dose of 38.5 Gy at 3.85 Gy per fraction twice daily using a four-field noncoplanar beam setup. A minimum 6 h interval was required between fractions. In the WBI arm, the whole breast including the entirety of the lumpectomy cavity was treated to a total dose of 50.4 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction daily using opposed tangential beams. The lumpectomy cavity volume, planning target volume for evaluation (PTV{sub E}VAL), and critical structure volumes were contoured for both the PBI and WBI patients. Dosimetric parameters, dose volume histograms (DVHs), and generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) for target and critical structures were compared. Dosimetric results show the PBI plans, compared to the WBI plans, have smaller hot spots in the PTV{sub E}VAL (maximum dose: 104.2% versus 110.9%) and reduced dose to the ipsilateral breast (V50: 48.6% versus 92.1% and V100: 10.2% versus 50.5%), contralateral breast (V3: 0.16% versus 2.04%), ipsilateral lung (V30: 5.8% versus 12.7%), and thyroid (maximum dose: 0.5% versus 2.0%) with p values {<=}0.01. However, similar dose coverage of the PTV{sub E}VAL (98% for PBI and 99% for WBI, on average) was observed and the dose difference for other critical structures was clinically insignificant in both arms. The gEUD data analysis showed the reduction of dose to the ipsilateral breast and lung, contralateral breast and thyroid. In addition, preliminary dermatologic adverse event assessment data suggested reduced skin toxicity for patients treated with the PBI technique.

OSTI ID:
21032871
Journal Information:
Medical Physics, Journal Name: Medical Physics Journal Issue: 12 Vol. 34; ISSN 0094-2405; ISSN MPHYA6
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Prone Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery: Compliance to the Dosimetry Requirements of RTOG-0413
Journal Article · Wed Nov 14 23:00:00 EST 2012 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22149623

Does Three-Dimensional External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation Spare Lung Tissue Compared With Standard Whole Breast Irradiation?
Journal Article · Tue Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 2009 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21281996

Superiority of Equivalent Uniform Dose (EUD)-Based Optimization for Breast and Chest Wall
Journal Article · Thu Apr 01 00:00:00 EDT 2010 · Medical Dosimetry · OSTI ID:21333972