skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: {sup 18}F-FDG-PET for evaluation of the response to concurrent chemoradiation therapy with intensity-modulated radiation technique for Stage T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
;  [1];  [2];  [3]; ; ;  [4];  [5];  [2];  [4];  [6];  [7];  [2]
  1. Molecular Imaging Center, Taipei Chang Gung Head and Neck Oncology Group, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan (China)
  2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Taipei Chang Gung Head and Neck Oncology Group, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan (China)
  3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Chang Gung Head and Neck Oncology Group, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan (China)
  4. Department of Medical Oncology, Taipei Chang Gung Head and Neck Oncology Group, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan (China)
  5. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Taipei Chang Gung Head and Neck Oncology Group, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan (China)
  6. Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Taoyuan, Taiwan (China)
  7. Department of Medical Biotechnology, Taipei Chang Gung Head and Neck Oncology Group, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan (China)

Purpose: This article evaluates [{sup 18}F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ({sup 18}F-FDG-PET) findings as a predictor for local responders (R) vs. nonresponders (NR) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with Stage T4 lesions, before and at 3 months after completion of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CCRT). Methods and Materials: From January 2002 to November 2003, 39 T4 NPC patients were enrolled. All had magnetic resonance imaging and {sup 18}F-FDG-PET, both before and 3 months after CCRT. Any residual/recurrent lesions were confirmed histopathologically. Results: Of the 39 eligible patients, after a follow-up of 24.2 {+-} 9.5 months, 35 became disease-free and 4 had residual or recurrent disease. Marginal differences in standard uptake values (SUV) were observed (10.9 {+-} 5.3 vs. 15.6 {+-} 3.4, p = 0.058) between R and NR before treatment, and value changes of SUV before and after CCRT were not significantly different. However, highly significantly lower values of SUV were noted for R than for NR 3 months after completion of CCRT (2.1 {+-} 0.8 vs. 5.5 {+-} 3.2, p 0.001). One hundred percent positive and negative predictive values were observed for SUV values of 4.0, set 3 months after completion of CCRT. Conclusions: Neither the pretreatment SUV nor the changes of SUV between pretreatment and posttreatment were significant predictors for local response. SUV at 3 months after completion of CCRT was a significant determinator for local response. The cutoff of 4.0 for SUV at 3 months after completion of CCRT was useful to be offered as a diagnostic reference for recurrent or residual tumor for NPC treatment.

OSTI ID:
20850008
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 65, Issue 5; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.02.031; PII: S0360-3016(06)00388-9; Copyright (c) 2006 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English