Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Measurement of binding potential of [C11]WIN 35,428 for dopamine re-uptake site in normal human brain: Comparison of graphical and non-linear least-squares analytic method

Journal Article · · Journal of Nuclear Medicine
OSTI ID:198043
; ;  [1]
  1. Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD (United States); and others

(C11)WIN 35,428 was evaluated as a specific radioligand for the dopamine re-uptake site in brain by PET scanning. Twenty mCi of [C11]WIN 35,428 was administered IV to 8 normal volunteers (19-81 y.o.). Fifty dynamic PET scan images were acquired with blood sampling, for 90 min after [C11]WIN 35,428 injection. Four different kinetic modeling procedures were used to estimate the binding potential, k3/k4. The k3 and k4 parameters reflect the rate constants for binding to and dissociation from receptors, respectively. The first model is a three-compartment model which is a standard non-linear least-squares analysis with constraint of the k1/k2 ratio. This consists of a plasma, ligand free and a specifically bound compartment. The k1/k2 ratio was estimated with a two-compartment model using plasma and cerebellar data. The other three models are two-compartment models. This consists of a plasma and a brain (cerebellum or striatum) compartment. The second model is a two-compartment graphical method of Gjedde. The distribution volume of [C11]WIN in striatum and cerebellum was plotted as an intercept. The third model approach is the graphical method of Logan, which was a modification of the Gjedde approach. The distribution volume of [C11]WIN in striatum and cerebellum was plotted as a slope. The fourth model consisted of a direct fit a f cerebellum and striatum without plasma input. The mean value and standard deviation of k3/k4 in each model was 4.38 {plus_minus} 0.81, 3.93 {plus_minus} 0.98, 4.15 {plus_minus} 0.83, and 6.90 {plus_minus} 2.19, respectively. There is a significant difference between k3/k4 values of the constraint method and that of the last method. There is no significant difference between the k3/k4 values of the constraint method and the other two methods.

OSTI ID:
198043
Report Number(s):
CONF-940605--; CNN: Grant MH 42821; Grant NS 15080
Journal Information:
Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Journal Name: Journal of Nuclear Medicine Journal Issue: Suppl.5 Vol. 35; ISSN 0161-5505; ISSN JNMEAQ
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Three-compartment modeling of C-11 N-Methyl spiperone kinetics in the human brain
Conference · Sat Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1983 · J. Nucl. Med.; (United States) · OSTI ID:6929159

Fractional uptake value as a good indicator for glucose metabolism
Journal Article · Mon May 01 00:00:00 EDT 1995 · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · OSTI ID:441604

Measurements of glucose phosphorylation with FDG and PET are not reduced by dephosphorylation of FDG-6-phosphate
Journal Article · Sun Mar 31 23:00:00 EST 1991 · Journal of Nuclear Medicine; (USA) · OSTI ID:5802319