Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Report on Fuel Cycle Facility Requirements for Deployment of Demonstration Reactors and Potential Evolutionary Fuel Cycle Scenarios

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/1903005· OSTI ID:1903005
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [3];  [3];  [4];  [4]
  1. Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
  2. Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
  3. Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
  4. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)

A series of fuel cycle scenarios studies were performed to inform on fuel cycle capacities and facilities needed for large-scale deployment of the Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program (ARDP) reactors and potential future evolutionary fuel cycle scenarios. The reactor deployment and evolutionary fuel cycle scenarios from the present to 2100 were developed based on the following assumptions: 1) achievement of a net-zero emissions economy in the United States by 2050, which requires a nuclear energy generation capacity of ~250 GWe by 2050, 2) the U.S. economic growth of 1% per year from 2051 to 2100, which results in ~340 GWe of nuclear energy capacity in 2100, and 3) commercial-scale recycling and high burnup fuel technologies are available after 2050. Thus, evolutionary fuel cycles with those advanced nuclear technologies start after 2050. A single once-through fuel cycle scenario was assumed from the present to 2050 to achieve a net-zero emissions economy in the United States, and the following four evolutionary fuel cycle scenarios from 2051 to 2100 were considered, 1) Once through fuel cycle with ARDP reactors (Natrium and Xe-100), 2) Once-through fuel cycle with Breed-and-Burn (B&B) fast reactors, 3) Recycling fuel cycle of used metallic fuel in fast reactors, and 4) Recycle fuel cycle of both used uranium oxide and metallic fuels in fast reactors. The projected front-end and back-end fuel cycle capacity demands are compared with the current domestic and global (if needed) fuel cycle capacities.

Research Organization:
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Supply Chain
DOE Contract Number:
AC02-06CH11357
OSTI ID:
1903005
Report Number(s):
ANL/NSE-22/39; 180111
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Assessment of transition fuel cycle performance with and without a modified-open fuel cycle
Conference · Sun Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2012 · OSTI ID:22107878

Closed ThUOX Fuel Cycle for LWRs with ADTT (ATW) Backend for the 21st Century
Conference · Tue Oct 06 00:00:00 EDT 1998 · OSTI ID:760040

Pros and Cons Analysis of HALEU Utilization in Example Fuel Cycles
Technical Report · Wed Jun 07 00:00:00 EDT 2023 · OSTI ID:1985692