Optimization and Techno-Economic Comparison of Regenerators and Recuperators in sCO2 Recompression Brayton Cycles for Concentrating Solar Power Applications
Supercritical CO2 power cycles might be capable of providing the cost reductions and efficiency improvements necessary to reach concentrating solar power (CSP) cost targets, but require large, highly effective recuperators. Fixed-bed regenerators are a periodic heat exchanger that could be an effective yet low-cost alternative to these recuperators. This study presents a techno-economic comparison of regenerators and recuperators for a 100 MWe supercritical CO2 power cycle for CSP applications. We quantify the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for the power plant with both types of heat exchangers, and explore sensitivity of LCOE to parameters such as CSP-specific capital costs, power cycle component capital costs, and regenerator valve replacements costs. Results indicate that the incumbent printed circuit heat exchangers achieve the lowest LCOE, unless the upper extreme of PCHE capital cost and lower extremes of regenerator and valve capital and O&M costs are realized. Sensitivity analysis also illustrates that the primary heat exchanger cost is the most influential of power cycle components, and that CSP component capital cost is more influential than power cycle capital costs. This illustrates the importance of reducing the cost of heliostats, receivers, and thermal energy storage for achieving CSP LCOE targets.
- Research Organization:
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Solar Energy Technologies Office (EE-4S)
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC36-08GO28308
- OSTI ID:
- 1869696
- Report Number(s):
- NREL/JA-5400-77470; MainId:27406; UUID:a7398b31-df01-4236-9292-72144b26fefe; MainAdminID:64556
- Journal Information:
- Solar Energy, Journal Name: Solar Energy Vol. 238
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Cost comparison of printed circuit heat exchanger to low cost periodic flow regenerator for use as recuperator in a s-CO2 Brayton cycle
Simulation of the supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton power cycle with a high-temperature regenerator
Modeling a Water-Cooled Printed Circuit Heat Exchanger Condensing CO2 for use in SCO2 Cycle System Optimization Studies
Journal Article
·
Wed Sep 20 20:00:00 EDT 2017
· Applied Energy
·
OSTI ID:1434935
Simulation of the supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton power cycle with a high-temperature regenerator
Journal Article
·
Tue Jan 05 19:00:00 EST 2021
· Energy Conversion and Management
·
OSTI ID:1848394
Modeling a Water-Cooled Printed Circuit Heat Exchanger Condensing CO2 for use in SCO2 Cycle System Optimization Studies
Conference
·
Mon Jun 26 00:00:00 EDT 2023
·
OSTI ID:1991597