Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

HYSPLIT/MACCS Atmospheric Dispersion Model Technical Documentation and Benchmark Analysis

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/1865261· OSTI ID:1865261
 [1];  [1];  [2]
  1. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
  2. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Washington, DC (United States)

The nuclear accident consequence analysis code MACCS has traditionally modeled dispersion during downwind transport using a Gaussian plume segment model. MACCS is designed to estimate consequence measures such as air concentrations and ground depositions, radiological doses, and health and economic impacts on a statistical basis over the course of a year to produce annualaveraged output measures. The objective of this work is to supplement the Gaussian atmospheric transport and diffusion (ATD) model currently in MACCS with a new option using the HYSPLIT model. HYSPLIT/MACCS coupling has been implemented, with HYSPLIT as an alternative ATD option. The subsequent calculations in MACCS use the HYSPLIT-generated air concentration, and ground deposition values to calculate the same range of output quantities (dose, health effects, risks, etc.) that can be generated when using the MACCS Gaussian ATD model. Based on the results from the verification test cases, the implementation of the HYSPLIT/MACCS coupling is confirmed. This report contains technical details of the HYSPLIT/MACCS coupling and presents a benchmark analysis using the HYSPLIT/MACCS coupling system. The benchmark analysis, which involves running specific scenarios and sensitivity studies designed to examine how the results generated by the traditional MACCS Gaussian plume segment model compare to the new, higher fidelity HYSPLIT/MACCS modeling option, demonstrates the modeling results that can be obtained by using this new option. The comparisons provided herein can also help decision-makers evaluate the potential benefit of using results based on higher fidelity modeling with the additional computational burden needed to perform the calculations. Three sensitivity studies to investigate the potential impact of alternative modeling options, regarding 1) input meteorological data set, 2) method to estimate stability class, and 3) plume dispersion model for larger distances, on consequence results were also performed. The results of these analyses are provided and discussed in this report.

Research Organization:
Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USNRC
DOE Contract Number:
NA0003525
OSTI ID:
1865261
Report Number(s):
SAND2022-5515; 705595
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

MACCS Theory Manual
Technical Report · Wed Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 2021 · OSTI ID:1820907

Utilizing HYSPLIT for Emergency Response Modeling at SRS
Conference · Wed Jul 10 00:00:00 EDT 2024 · OSTI ID:2406245

Assessment of the MACCS Code Applicability for Nearfield Consequence Analysis
Technical Report · Fri Jan 31 23:00:00 EST 2020 · OSTI ID:1604262